Paper · 2023 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Effect of delayed sowing on grain number, grain weight, and protein concentration of wheat grains at specific positions within spikes

Jin-peng CHU; Xin-hu GUO; Fei-na ZHENG; et al.

11
claims
30
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Delays in sowing have significant effects on grain yield, yield components, and grain protein concentrations of winter wheat. However, little is known about how delayed sowing affects these characteristics at different positions in wheat spikes. In this study, the effects of sowing date were investigated in a winter wheat cultivar, Shannong 30, which was sown in 2019 and 2020 on October 8 (normal sowing) and October 22 (late sowing) under field conditions. Delayed sowing increased the partitioning of 13C-assimilates to spikes, particularly to florets at the apical section of a spike and those occupying distal positions on the same spikelet. Consequently, the increase in grain number was greatest for apical sections, followed by the basal and central sections. No significant differences were observed in superior grain number in the basal and central sections between sowing dates, while the number in apical sections was significantly different. The number of inferior grains in each section also substantially increased in response to delayed sowing. Average grain weight in all sections remained unchanged under delayed sowing because there was a parallel increase in grain number and 13C-assimilate partitioning to grains at specific positions in the spikes. Increases in grain number m-2 resulted in reduced grain protein concentration as the limited nitrogen supply was diluted into more grains. Delayed sowing caused the greatest decrease in grain protein concentration in basal sections, followed by the central and apical sections. No significant differences in the reduction in grain protein concentration were observed between inferior and superior grains under delayed sowing. In conclusion, a 2-week delay in sowing improved grain yield through increased grain number per spike, which originated principally from increased grain number in the apical sections of spikes and in distal positions on the same spikelet. However, grain protein concentrations decreased in each section because of increased grain number and reduced N uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing increased partitioning of 13C-assimilates to spikes, particularly to apical and distal florets.

Material
Shannong 30e0
Organ / stage
spikese1
Treatment
Delayed sowinge1
Outcome
partitioning of 13C-assimilates to spikese1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
normal sowinge0
Setting
under field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“a winter wheat cultivar, Shannong 30, which was sown in 2019 and 2020 on October 8 (normal sowing) and October 22 (late sowing) under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“Delayed sowing increased the partitioning of 13C-assimilates to spikes, particularly to florets at the apical section of a spike and those occupying distal positions on the same spikelet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing increased grain number most in apical sections, followed by basal and central sections.

Material
Shannong 30e0
Organ / stage
apical sectionse2
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
grain numbere2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
normal sowinge0
Setting
under field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“a winter wheat cultivar, Shannong 30, which was sown in 2019 and 2020 on October 8 (normal sowing) and October 22 (late sowing) under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–459 · show in text ↑
e2

“Consequently, the increase in grain number was greatest for apical sections, followed by the basal and central sections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain number of superior grains in basal and central sections did not differ significantly between sowing dates.

Material
Shannong 30e0
Organ / stage
basal and central sectionse3
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
superior grain number in the basal and central sectionse3
Direction
No significant differencese3
Comparator
normal sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“a winter wheat cultivar, Shannong 30, which was sown in 2019 and 2020 on October 8 (normal sowing) and October 22 (late sowing) under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–459 · show in text ↑
e3

“No significant differences were observed in superior grain number in the basal and central sections between sowing dates, while the number in apical sections was significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain number in apical sections differed significantly between sowing dates.

Material
Shannong 30e0
Organ / stage
apical sectionse3
Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
number in apical sectionse3
Comparator
normal sowinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“a winter wheat cultivar, Shannong 30, which was sown in 2019 and 2020 on October 8 (normal sowing) and October 22 (late sowing) under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–459 · show in text ↑
e3

“No significant differences were observed in superior grain number in the basal and central sections between sowing dates, while the number in apical sections was significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing substantially increased the number of inferior grains in each section.

Material
Shannong 30e0
Organ / stage
each sectione1
Treatment
delayed sowinge1
Outcome
number of inferior grainse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
normal sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“a winter wheat cultivar, Shannong 30, which was sown in 2019 and 2020 on October 8 (normal sowing) and October 22 (late sowing) under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of inferior grains in each section also substantially increased in response to delayed sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average grain weight in all sections was unchanged under delayed sowing.

Material
Shannong 30e0
Organ / stage
all sectionse1
Treatment
delayed sowinge1
Outcome
Average grain weighte1
Direction
unchangede1
Comparator
normal sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“a winter wheat cultivar, Shannong 30, which was sown in 2019 and 2020 on October 8 (normal sowing) and October 22 (late sowing) under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average grain weight in all sections remained unchanged under delayed sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1139 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased grain number per m2 was associated with reduced grain protein concentration, as the limited nitrogen supply was diluted.

Compound
nitrogene1
Outcome
grain protein concentratione1
Direction
reducede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increases in grain number m-2 resulted in reduced grain protein concentration as the limited nitrogen supply was diluted into more grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing caused the greatest decrease in grain protein concentration in basal sections, followed by central and apical sections.

Material
Shannong 30e0
Organ / stage
basal sectionse1
Treatment
Delayed sowinge1
Outcome
grain protein concentratione1
Direction
decreasee1
Comparator
central and apical sectionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“a winter wheat cultivar, Shannong 30, which was sown in 2019 and 2020 on October 8 (normal sowing) and October 22 (late sowing) under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“Delayed sowing caused the greatest decrease in grain protein concentration in basal sections, followed by the central and apical sections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under delayed sowing, the reduction in grain protein concentration did not differ significantly between inferior and superior grains.

Organ / stage
inferior and superior grainse1
Treatment
delayed sowinge1
Outcome
reduction in grain protein concentratione1
Direction
No significant differencese1
Comparator
superior grainse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“No significant differences in the reduction in grain protein concentration were observed between inferior and superior grains under delayed sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2-week delay in sowing improved grain yield through increased grain number per spike.

Material
Shannong 30e0
Treatment
2-week delay in sowinge1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
through increased grain number per spikee1
Comparator
normal sowinge0
Setting
under field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“a winter wheat cultivar, Shannong 30, which was sown in 2019 and 2020 on October 8 (normal sowing) and October 22 (late sowing) under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“a 2-week delay in sowing improved grain yield through increased grain number per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1800 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein concentrations decreased in each section because of increased grain number and reduced N uptake.

Organ / stage
each sectione1
Outcome
grain protein concentrationse1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
because of increased grain number and reduced N uptakee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain protein concentrations decreased in each section because of increased grain number and reduced N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2056 · show in text ↑

sowing time · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.