Paper · 2025 · Crop and Environment

Moderate late sowing balances wheat yield and dough quality by regulating temperature-mediated nitrogen accumulation and translocation

Yakun Li; Xidan Cao; Jingyi Feng; et al.

16
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Although numerous studies have reported the effects of late sowing on wheat yield, its impact on the microstructure and processing quality of wheat dough remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate how late sowing influences wheat quality, with a focus on both the general characteristics and fine structure of dough. A two-factor split-plot field experiment was conducted during the 2020–2022 growing seasons. Sowing date was assigned as the main plot factor, including four treatments: T1 (October 8), T2 (October 20), T3 (November 1), and T4 (November 13). The sub-plot factor was wheat variety, comprising two high-gluten varieties and two medium-gluten varieties. Results indicated that appropriately late sowing altered the source-sink ratio, enhanced nitrogen uptake and accumulation in wheat plants, and significantly increased grain protein content and protein yield. At T3, protein content increased by 1.71% to 27.22%, and protein yield increased by 3.32% to 15.42%. Furthermore, late sowing improved the microstructure of the dough and enhanced the processing quality of the flour. The Mantel test and structural equation modeling revealed that moderate delay in sowing improved thermal conditions from wintering to flowering stages, which promoted nitrogen accumulation and translocation within the plants and increased the contents of protein and glutenin subunits in the grain. These changes ultimately optimized the dough microstructure and improved the processing quality of wheat. With the delay of sowing date, the yield in 2020-2021 increased first and then decreased, and the yield in 2021-2022 continued to decrease from T2 to T4. Our study provides a theoretical reference for how sowing date affects wheat yield and quality. • Moderate late delayed sowing increased temperatures during the wintering to flowering period. • Moderate late sowing improved the gluten secondary structure and dough microstructure. • Moderate late sowing enhanced wheat processing quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriately late sowing altered source-sink ratio.

Treatment
appropriately late sowinge0
Outcome
source-sink ratioe0
Direction
alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that appropriately late sowing altered the source-sink ratio, enhanced nitrogen uptake and accumulation in wheat plants, and significantly increased grain protein content and protein yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriately late sowing enhanced nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
appropriately late sowinge0
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that appropriately late sowing altered the source-sink ratio, enhanced nitrogen uptake and accumulation in wheat plants, and significantly increased grain protein content and protein yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriately late sowing enhanced accumulation.

Treatment
appropriately late sowinge0
Outcome
accumulatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that appropriately late sowing altered the source-sink ratio, enhanced nitrogen uptake and accumulation in wheat plants, and significantly increased grain protein content and protein yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriately late sowing increased grain protein content.

Treatment
appropriately late sowinge0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that appropriately late sowing altered the source-sink ratio, enhanced nitrogen uptake and accumulation in wheat plants, and significantly increased grain protein content and protein yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriately late sowing increased protein yield.

Treatment
appropriately late sowinge0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that appropriately late sowing altered the source-sink ratio, enhanced nitrogen uptake and accumulation in wheat plants, and significantly increased grain protein content and protein yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At T3, protein content increased by 1.71% to 27.22%.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.71% to 27.22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At T3, protein content increased by 1.71% to 27.22%, and protein yield increased by 3.32% to 15.42%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At T3, protein yield increased by 3.32% to 15.42%.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.32% to 15.42%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At T3, protein content increased by 1.71% to 27.22%, and protein yield increased by 3.32% to 15.42%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing improved microstructure of the dough.

Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
microstructure of the doughe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“late sowing improved the microstructure of the dough and enhanced the processing quality of the flour.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing enhanced processing quality of the flour.

Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
processing quality of the floure0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“late sowing improved the microstructure of the dough and enhanced the processing quality of the flour.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate sowing delay improved thermal conditions.

Treatment
moderate delay in sowinge0
Outcome
thermal conditionse0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate delay in sowing improved thermal conditions from wintering to flowering stages, which promoted nitrogen accumulation and translocation within the plants and increased the contents of protein and glutenin subunits in the grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate sowing delay promoted nitrogen accumulation and translocation.

Treatment
moderate delay in sowinge0
Outcome
nitrogen accumulation and translocatione0
Direction
promotede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate delay in sowing improved thermal conditions from wintering to flowering stages, which promoted nitrogen accumulation and translocation within the plants and increased the contents of protein and glutenin subunits in the grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate sowing delay increased protein.

Treatment
moderate delay in sowinge0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate delay in sowing improved thermal conditions from wintering to flowering stages, which promoted nitrogen accumulation and translocation within the plants and increased the contents of protein and glutenin subunits in the grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate sowing delay increased glutenin subunits.

Treatment
moderate delay in sowinge0
Outcome
glutenin subunitse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate delay in sowing improved thermal conditions from wintering to flowering stages, which promoted nitrogen accumulation and translocation within the plants and increased the contents of protein and glutenin subunits in the grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield in 2020-2021 first increased and then decreased with later sowing.

Treatment
delay of sowing datee0
Outcome
yield in 2020-2021e0
Direction
increased first and then decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the delay of sowing date, the yield in 2020-2021 increased first and then decreased, and the yield in 2021-2022 continued to decrease from T2 to T4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1657 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield in 2021-2022 decreased from T2 to T4.

Treatment
delay of sowing datee0
Outcome
yield in 2021-2022e0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
T2 to T4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the delay of sowing date, the yield in 2020-2021 increased first and then decreased, and the yield in 2021-2022 continued to decrease from T2 to T4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1657 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate late sowing improved gluten secondary structure.

Treatment
Moderate late sowinge0
Outcome
gluten secondary structuree0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate late sowing improved the gluten secondary structure and dough microstructure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1852–1938 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑

sowing time · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

sowing time · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

sowing time · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

sowing time · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.