Paper · 2001 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. II. Nitrogen concentrations, N accumulation, and N fertiliser use efficiency

P. J. Hocking; M. Stapper

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Canola, Indian mustard, and wheat were grown at Ariah Park and Cowra (canola only) in the cropping belt of New South Wales, Australia, to determine the effects of sowing time (canola and wheat) and nitrogen (N) fertiliser on N concentrations and N accumulation in shoots, N fertiliser use-efficiency, and N removal in grain of the crops. Concentrations of N in shoots of all crops decreased during the season, irrespective of sowing time or N fertiliser rate. Late sowing decreased N accumulation by 55% and 40% for canola and wheat, respectively, at Ariah Park, and by 50% for canola at Cowra, but increased canola and wheat grain N (protein) concentrations more than the applied N. All crops accumulated most of their N before anthesis, and there was little N accumulation after the end of flowering; however, sowing canola late increased the proportion of N accumulated during flowering. Indices of N fertiliser use efficiency were reduced by sowing late, but N use efficiencies of the oilseeds at each sowing time were similar to values for wheat after accounting for differences in the biosynthetic costs of grain and straw production. Removal of N in canola grain from an April sowing was 35% greater than N removal by wheat grain sown at the same time, but was similar for both crops from late May and July sowings. Consequently, more N fertiliser should be applied to canola than wheat to obtain high grain yields when both crops are sown early in the season. It was concluded that sowing early was essential to achieve high N use efficiency, reduce potential losses of N, and maximise economic returns from N fertiliser.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot nitrogen concentrations declined over the season in all three crops.

Outcome
Concentrations of N in shootse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of N in shoots of all crops decreased during the season, irrespective of sowing time or N fertiliser rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–458 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canola, Indian mustard, and wheat were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing reduced canola N accumulation by 55% at Ariah Park.

Treatment
Late sowinge0
Outcome
N accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
55%e0
Setting
Ariah Parke0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late sowing decreased N accumulation by 55% and 40% for canola and wheat, respectively, at Ariah Park”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing reduced wheat N accumulation by 40% at Ariah Park.

Treatment
Late sowinge0
Outcome
N accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
40%e0
Setting
Ariah Parke0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late sowing decreased N accumulation by 55% and 40% for canola and wheat, respectively, at Ariah Park”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing reduced canola N accumulation by 50% at Cowra.

Treatment
Late sowinge1
Outcome
N accumulatione1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
50%e0
Setting
Cowrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by 50% for canola at Cowra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–593 · show in text ↑
e1

“Late sowing decreased N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing increased canola and wheat grain nitrogen concentration more than applied nitrogen did.

Treatment
Late sowinge1
Outcome
grain N (protein) concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the applied Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased canola and wheat grain N (protein) concentrations more than the applied N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–682 · show in text ↑
e1

“Late sowing decreased N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All crops accumulated most nitrogen before anthesis, with little after flowering.

Organ / stage
anthesise0
Outcome
most of their N before anthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All crops accumulated most of their N before anthesis, and there was little N accumulation after the end of flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canola, Indian mustard, and wheat were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing increased the fraction of canola N accumulated during flowering.

Treatment
sowing canola latee0
Outcome
proportion of N accumulated during floweringe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sowing canola late increased the proportion of N accumulated during flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing reduced indices of nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency.

Treatment
sowing latee0
Outcome
Indices of N fertiliser use efficiencye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indices of N fertiliser use efficiency were reduced by sowing late”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–957 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canola, Indian mustard, and wheat were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oilseed N use efficiencies were similar to wheat after accounting for biosynthetic costs.

Taxon
oilseedse0
Outcome
N use efficienciese0
Qualifier
after accounting for differences in the biosynthetic costs of grain and straw productione0
Comparator
wheate0

Verbatim

e0

“N use efficiencies of the oilseeds at each sowing time were similar to values for wheat after accounting for differences in the biosynthetic costs of grain and straw production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

April-sown canola grain removed 35% more nitrogen than same-time wheat grain.

Outcome
Removal of N in canola graine0
Direction
greatere0
Value
35%e0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Removal of N in canola grain from an April sowing was 35% greater than N removal by wheat grain sown at the same time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1258 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late May and July sowings gave similar grain nitrogen removal for canola and wheat.

Outcome
N removale1
Qualifier
late May and July sowingse0
Comparator
wheate1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was similar for both crops from late May and July sowings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“N removal by wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1236 · show in text ↑
e2

“canola grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1169 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise more N fertilizer for early sown canola than wheat for high grain yields.

Outcome
more N fertiliser should be applied to canola than wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more N fertiliser should be applied to canola than wheat to obtain high grain yields when both crops are sown early in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1466 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that early sowing is essential for nitrogen efficiency, lower N losses and economic returns.

Outcome
sowing earlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sowing early was essential to achieve high N use efficiency, reduce potential losses of N, and maximise economic returns from N fertiliser”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1628 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canola, Indian mustard, and wheat were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑

sowing time · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.