Paper · 2008 · PubMed

[Effects of sowing date and planting density on the grain' s protein component and quality of strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars].

Cui-ping Yan; Yong-qing Zhang; Ding-yi Zhang; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In a field experiment with split-split plot design, the effects of sowing date and planting density on the grain's protein component and quality of strong gluten wheat cultivar Linyou 145 and medium gluten wheat cultivar Linyou 2018 were studied. The results showed that proper sowing date brought the highest protein content and yield in wheat grain. With sowing date postponed, the grain's gliadin and glutenin contents of Linyou 145 increased obviously, while those of Linyou 2018 changed little. The grain quality of Linyou 145 was more affected by sowing date, compared with that of Linyou 2018. When sowing at proper date, the grain's protein and glutenin contents had significant correlations with its wet gluten content, sedimentation value, dough stability time, softness, and evaluation value; while when the sowing date postponed, there existed a positive correlation between the contents of gliadin and wet gluten. The change of the proportions of different protein components in wheat grain induced by the variation of sowing date could be the main reason of the improvement in wheat grain quality. Within the test range (2.25 million - 3.75 million plants x hm(-2)) of planting density, the grain's protein content was less affected, but the grain quality of Linyou 145 was affected to a certain extent. Low planting density (2.25 million plants x hm(-2)) brought the best grain quality of Linyou 2018.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proper sowing date gave the highest grain protein content and yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
proper sowing datee0
Outcome
protein content and yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“proper sowing date brought the highest protein content and yield in wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postponed sowing increased gliadin and glutenin contents of Linyou 145.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Linyou 145e1
Treatment
sowing date postponede1
Outcome
gliadin and glutenin contentse1
Direction
increased obviouslye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“With sowing date postponed, the grain's gliadin and glutenin contents of Linyou 145 increased obviously, while those of Linyou 2018 changed little”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postponed sowing changed gliadin and glutenin contents of Linyou 2018 little.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Linyou 2018e1
Treatment
sowing date postponede1
Outcome
gliadin and glutenin contentse1
Direction
changed littlee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“With sowing date postponed, the grain's gliadin and glutenin contents of Linyou 145 increased obviously, while those of Linyou 2018 changed little”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–498 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain quality of Linyou 145 was more affected by sowing date than that of Linyou 2018.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Linyou 145e2
Treatment
sowing datee2
Outcome
grain qualitye2
Direction
was more affectede2
Comparator
Linyou 2018e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grain quality of Linyou 145 was more affected by sowing date, compared with that of Linyou 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–599 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At proper sowing date, grain protein and glutenin contents correlated significantly with wet gluten content, sedimentation value and dough stability time.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sowing at proper datee3
Outcome
wet gluten content, sedimentation value, dough stability timee3
Direction
significant correlationse3
Qualifier
protein and glutenin contentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
e3

“When sowing at proper date, the grain's protein and glutenin contents had significant correlations with its wet gluten content, sedimentation value, dough stability time, softness, and evaluation value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–802 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At proper sowing date, grain protein and glutenin contents correlated significantly with softness and evaluation value.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sowing at proper datee3
Outcome
softness, and evaluation valuee3
Direction
significant correlationse3
Qualifier
protein and glutenin contentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
e3

“When sowing at proper date, the grain's protein and glutenin contents had significant correlations with its wet gluten content, sedimentation value, dough stability time, softness, and evaluation value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–802 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postponed sowing gave a positive correlation between gliadin contents and wet gluten.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sowing date postponede4
Outcome
wet glutene4
Direction
positive correlatione4
Qualifier
contents of gliadine4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
e4

“when the sowing date postponed, there existed a positive correlation between the contents of gliadin and wet gluten”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–925 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in protein component proportions induced by sowing date variation could be the main reason for improved grain quality.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
variation of sowing datee5
Outcome
improvement in wheat grain qualitye5
Qualifier
proportions of different protein componentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
e5

“The change of the proportions of different protein components in wheat grain induced by the variation of sowing date could be the main reason of the improvement in wheat grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within the tested planting density range, grain protein content was less affected.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
planting densitye7
Outcome
protein contente6
Direction
less affectede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
e6

“the grain's protein content was less affected, but the grain quality of Linyou 145 was affected to a certain extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1316 · show in text ↑
e7

“Within the test range (2.25 million - 3.75 million plants x hm(-2)) of planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within the tested planting density range, grain quality of Linyou 145 was affected to a certain extent.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Linyou 145e6
Treatment
planting densitye7
Outcome
grain qualitye6
Direction
was affected to a certain extente6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
e6

“the grain's protein content was less affected, but the grain quality of Linyou 145 was affected to a certain extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1316 · show in text ↑
e7

“Within the test range (2.25 million - 3.75 million plants x hm(-2)) of planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low planting density gave the best grain quality of Linyou 2018.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Linyou 2018e1
Treatment
Low planting density (2.25 million plants x hm(-2))e1
Outcome
grain qualitye1
Direction
brought the beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strong and medium gluten winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
e1

“Low planting density (2.25 million plants x hm(-2)) brought the best grain quality of Linyou 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1415 · show in text ↑

sowing time · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

density · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

density · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 19 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

sowing time · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.