Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Ecology

Water Use Efficiency and Economics of Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.) Influenced by Drip Irrigation and Micronutrient Application Methods

Oma Shanker Bhukhar; A Shivran; Pryanka Kumawat; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in split plot design with drip irrigation levels (0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 IW/CPE ratios) in main plot and micronutrient application methods (control, soil, foliar and fertigation) in sub plot during season 2018 at S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Rabi Jobner (Rajasthan). The scheduling of drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio recorded significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua, test weight and seed yield over 0.4 IW/CPE ratio, however remaining statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratio. Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio recorded higher net return. Among micronutrient application methods, fertigation significantly increased plant height at 80 days after sowing and at harvest, dry matter accumulation at all growth stages, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua and seed yield over all other application methods. Significantly higher net return and B: C ratio was also recorded under fertigation method of micronutrient application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE gave significantly higher height than 0.4 IW/CPE and was statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratioe0
Comparator
0.4 IW/CPE ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The scheduling of drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio recorded significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua, test weight and seed yield over 0.4 IW/CPE ratio, however remaining statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE gave significantly higher dry matter than 0.4 IW/CPE and was statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratioe0
Comparator
0.4 IW/CPE ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The scheduling of drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio recorded significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua, test weight and seed yield over 0.4 IW/CPE ratio, however remaining statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE gave significantly higher siliquae than 0.4 IW/CPE and was statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
siliquae per plante0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratioe0
Comparator
0.4 IW/CPE ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The scheduling of drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio recorded significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua, test weight and seed yield over 0.4 IW/CPE ratio, however remaining statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE gave significantly higher seeds per siliqua than 0.4 IW/CPE and was statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
seeds per siliquae0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratioe0
Comparator
0.4 IW/CPE ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The scheduling of drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio recorded significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua, test weight and seed yield over 0.4 IW/CPE ratio, however remaining statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE gave significantly higher test weight than 0.4 IW/CPE and was statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratioe0
Comparator
0.4 IW/CPE ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The scheduling of drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio recorded significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua, test weight and seed yield over 0.4 IW/CPE ratio, however remaining statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE gave significantly higher seed yield than 0.4 IW/CPE and was statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratioe0
Comparator
0.4 IW/CPE ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The scheduling of drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio recorded significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua, test weight and seed yield over 0.4 IW/CPE ratio, however remaining statistically at par with 0.6 IW/CPE ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE gave higher net return.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratioe0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio recorded higher net return.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient fertigation significantly increased plant height over all other application methods.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
fertigatione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
all other application methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among micronutrient application methods, fertigation significantly increased plant height at 80 days after sowing and at harvest, dry matter accumulation at all growth stages, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua and seed yield over all other application methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient fertigation significantly increased dry matter accumulation over all other application methods.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
fertigatione0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
all other application methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among micronutrient application methods, fertigation significantly increased plant height at 80 days after sowing and at harvest, dry matter accumulation at all growth stages, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua and seed yield over all other application methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient fertigation significantly increased siliquae per plant over all other application methods.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
fertigatione0
Outcome
siliquae per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
all other application methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among micronutrient application methods, fertigation significantly increased plant height at 80 days after sowing and at harvest, dry matter accumulation at all growth stages, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua and seed yield over all other application methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient fertigation significantly increased seeds per siliqua over all other application methods.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
fertigatione0
Outcome
seeds per siliquae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
all other application methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among micronutrient application methods, fertigation significantly increased plant height at 80 days after sowing and at harvest, dry matter accumulation at all growth stages, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua and seed yield over all other application methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient fertigation significantly increased seed yield over all other application methods.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
fertigatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
all other application methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among micronutrient application methods, fertigation significantly increased plant height at 80 days after sowing and at harvest, dry matter accumulation at all growth stages, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua and seed yield over all other application methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient fertigation gave significantly higher net return.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
fertigation method of micronutrient applicatione0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher net return and B: C ratio was also recorded under fertigation method of micronutrient application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient fertigation gave significantly higher B: C ratio.

Taxon
Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
fertigation method of micronutrient applicatione0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher net return and B: C ratio was also recorded under fertigation method of micronutrient application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard ( Brassica junceaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–73 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 66 positive, 7 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

139 papers: 138 positive, 1 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

135 papers more in this group

See all 139 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.