Abstract
Six field experiments were carried out at EI· Minia, Assiout and Sohag governorates in farmer fierds during 1998 and 1999 seasons. The experiments were conducted to investigate the effeci of tillage systems and N fel'1i1izer combined with biofertilizer on grain yield of maize under farmer fields conditions. The experiments were in a split plot design, with four replications. Main plots devoted to tillage syslems and the sub plots to fertilizer rates. Results showed Ihet most Ihe studied characters were not affected by the tillage systems,however, almost characters under CT tended to increase slightly compared with no·lillage(Nn.while at Sohag the NT produced grain yields equal to those with CT. Results also, showed mat the application of biofertilizer{Cerealine) with mine ret nitrogen fertilizer at rate of 90kgN/fed or 120kgNffed increased growth , yield and yield components as compared to the treatments witho!)t Cereeline. The increment in maize yield by Cerealine+90kgN/fed and C£realin+120kgN/fed were 31.95 and 5.14% at EI·Minia 36.04 and7.53% at Assioul and 35.7 and 3.86% at Schag, respectively compared with the treatments without Cerealine. It could be concluded thot application 01 the biofertilizer Cerealine may be importance to enhancing maize yield with low rate of mineral N (90kg/fed) as compard to the high rete of N under tillage or no-liUage systems.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Most studied maize characters were not affected by the tillage systems.
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on grain yield of maize”
e1“Results showed Ihet most Ihe studied characters were not affected by the tillage systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage (CT) tended to increase maize characters slightly compared with no-tillage.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on grain yield of maize”
e2“almost characters under CT tended to increase slightly compared with no·lillage(Nn”
Claim · model-written summary
At Sohag, no-tillage (NT) produced maize grain yields equal to those with conventional tillage (CT).
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on grain yield of maize”
e3“at Sohag the NT produced grain yields equal to those with CT”
Claim · model-written summary
Cerealine with 90 kg N/fed increased maize yield by 31.95% at El-Minia compared with the treatments without Cerealine.
- Treatment
- Cerealine+90kgN/fede4
- Outcome
- maize yielde4
- Direction
- incremente4
- Value
- 31.95e4
- Comparator
- without Cerealinee4
- Setting
- EI·Miniae4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The increment in maize yield by Cerealine+90kgN/fed and C£realin+120kgN/fed were 31.95 and 5.14% at EI·Minia 36.04 and7.53% at Assioul and 35.7 and 3.86% at Schag, respectively compared with the treatments without Cerealine”
Claim · model-written summary
Cerealine with 90 kg N/fed increased maize yield by 36.04% at Assiut compared with the treatments without Cerealine.
- Treatment
- Cerealine+90kgN/fede4
- Outcome
- maize yielde4
- Direction
- incremente4
- Value
- 36.04e4
- Comparator
- without Cerealinee4
- Setting
- Assioule4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The increment in maize yield by Cerealine+90kgN/fed and C£realin+120kgN/fed were 31.95 and 5.14% at EI·Minia 36.04 and7.53% at Assioul and 35.7 and 3.86% at Schag, respectively compared with the treatments without Cerealine”
Claim · model-written summary
Cerealine with 90 kg N/fed increased maize yield by 35.7% at Sohag compared with the treatments without Cerealine.
- Treatment
- Cerealine+90kgN/fede4
- Outcome
- maize yielde4
- Direction
- incremente4
- Value
- 35.7e4
- Comparator
- without Cerealinee4
- Setting
- Schage4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The increment in maize yield by Cerealine+90kgN/fed and C£realin+120kgN/fed were 31.95 and 5.14% at EI·Minia 36.04 and7.53% at Assioul and 35.7 and 3.86% at Schag, respectively compared with the treatments without Cerealine”
Claim · model-written summary
Cerealine with 120 kg N/fed increased maize yield by 5.14% at El-Minia compared with the treatments without Cerealine.
- Treatment
- C£realin+120kgN/fede4
- Outcome
- maize yielde4
- Direction
- incremente4
- Value
- 5.14e4
- Comparator
- without Cerealinee4
- Setting
- EI·Miniae4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The increment in maize yield by Cerealine+90kgN/fed and C£realin+120kgN/fed were 31.95 and 5.14% at EI·Minia 36.04 and7.53% at Assioul and 35.7 and 3.86% at Schag, respectively compared with the treatments without Cerealine”
Claim · model-written summary
Cerealine with 120 kg N/fed increased maize yield by 7.53% at Assiut compared with the treatments without Cerealine.
- Treatment
- C£realin+120kgN/fede4
- Outcome
- maize yielde4
- Direction
- incremente4
- Value
- 7.53e4
- Comparator
- without Cerealinee4
- Setting
- Assioule4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The increment in maize yield by Cerealine+90kgN/fed and C£realin+120kgN/fed were 31.95 and 5.14% at EI·Minia 36.04 and7.53% at Assioul and 35.7 and 3.86% at Schag, respectively compared with the treatments without Cerealine”
Claim · model-written summary
Cerealine with 120 kg N/fed increased maize yield by 3.86% at Sohag compared with the treatments without Cerealine.
- Treatment
- C£realin+120kgN/fede4
- Outcome
- maize yielde4
- Direction
- incremente4
- Value
- 3.86e4
- Comparator
- without Cerealinee4
- Setting
- Schage4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The increment in maize yield by Cerealine+90kgN/fed and C£realin+120kgN/fed were 31.95 and 5.14% at EI·Minia 36.04 and7.53% at Assioul and 35.7 and 3.86% at Schag, respectively compared with the treatments without Cerealine”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that the biofertilizer Cerealine can enhance maize yield under a low mineral N rate (90 kg/fed).
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“the biofertilizer Cerealine may be importance to enhancing maize yield with low rate of mineral N (90kg/fed)”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.