Paper · 1969 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

The Interaction of Resistant Rootstock to the Nitrogen, Weed Control, Pruning and Thinning Effects on the Productivity of Concord Grapevines1

Nelson Shaulis; Robert G. D. Steel

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract This reports a 1960-1964 study of the responses of ‘Concord’ grapevines, own-rooted as well as grafted on the phylloxera resistant rootstock ‘Couderc 3309’, to pruning severity, thinning of fruit, N fertilization and weed control in a factorial experiment at Fredonia, New York. Although phylloxera were present, moderate size of vine and large yield were attained with own-rooted vines. Here, ‘3309’ rootstock did not have a unique effect on ‘Concord’. As an initial response, in 1960, when the range in vine size was 1.8 to 3.0 lb. of cane prunings per vine, increases in vine size were associated with increased yield because fruitfulness was not then seriously depressed by the vine size increasing treatments of ‘3009’ rootstock, cultivation, and N fertilization. As an equilibrium response in 1963-1964, in the range in vine size of 1.9-4.9 lb. of cane prunings per vine, when vine size was above 3.5 lb. of cane prunings, the decline in fruitfulness prevented a gain in yield, and there was either no increase or a decrease in fruit maturity. A 1966 sequel, affording 8’ and 16’ of canopy length for each 8’ spaced vine, showed fruitfulness to be closely associated with node number per unit length of canopy. Where the canopy length is fixed, crowding was likely the basis for the declines in fruitfulness which accompanied increases in vine size and node number. The effect of the resistant rootstock ‘3309’ was similar to that of the other vine-size increasing treatments in that it decreased fruitfulness and fruit maturity and had a small effect on yield and on soluble solids/vine.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Own-rooted Concord vines attained moderate size and large yield despite phylloxera presence.

Taxon
vinese0
Material
own-rooted vinese0
Interactor
phylloxeraPhylloxerae0pest
Outcome
moderate size of vine and large yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phylloxera
Phylloxera · InteractorBeatriz Moisset · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although phylloxera were present, moderate size of vine and large yield were attained with own-rooted vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3309 rootstock had no unique effect on Concord.

Taxon
‘Concord’e0
Treatment
‘3309’ rootstocke0
Outcome
unique effecte0
Direction
did not havee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Here, ‘3309’ rootstock did not have a unique effect on ‘Concord’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–461 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1960, larger vines were associated with increased yield.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
1.8 to 3.0 lb. of cane prunings per vinee0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorTreatmentComparatorSetting

Verbatim

e0

“in 1960, when the range in vine size was 1.8 to 3.0 lb. of cane prunings per vine, increases in vine size were associated with increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–629 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At equilibrium, vine size above 3.5 lb of cane prunings did not increase yield because fruitfulness declined.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
prevented a gaine0
Qualifier
above 3.5 lb. of cane pruningse0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“when vine size was above 3.5 lb. of cane prunings, the decline in fruitfulness prevented a gain in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–991 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At equilibrium, larger vine size yielded no increase or a decrease in fruit maturity.

Outcome
fruit maturitye0
Direction
no increase or a decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonMaterial

Verbatim

e0

“there was either no increase or a decrease in fruit maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1057 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruitfulness was closely associated with node number per unit canopy length.

Organ / stage
nodee0
Outcome
fruitfulnesse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“fruitfulness to be closely associated with node number per unit length of canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3309 rootstock decreased fruitfulness and fruit maturity.

Treatment
resistant rootstock ‘3309’e0
Outcome
fruitfulness and fruit maturitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
other vine-size increasing treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of the resistant rootstock ‘3309’ was similar to that of the other vine-size increasing treatments in that it decreased fruitfulness and fruit maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3309 rootstock had a small effect on yield and soluble solids per vine.

Treatment
resistant rootstock ‘3309’e0
Outcome
yield and on soluble solids/vinee0
Comparator
other vine-size increasing treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of the resistant rootstock ‘3309’ was similar to that of the other vine-size increasing treatments in that it decreased fruitfulness and fruit maturity and had a small effect on yield and on soluble solids/vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1602 · show in text ↑