Paper · 2022 · University of Sindh Journal of Animal Sciences (USJAS)

Efficacy of Conventional Insecticides Against Maize Stem Borer (Chilo Partellus) and Shoot Fly (Atherigona Soccata)

MAHEEN KHAN; MUHAMMAD FARHANULLAH KHAN; AMJAD SULTAN; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Maize stem borer, Chilo partellus Swinhoe and shoot fly, Atherigona soccata Rondani are considered as major pests of maize (Zea mays, L.). Carbofuran (Carbamate), Endosulfan (Organochlorine), Phorate (Organophosphate), Permethrin (Pyrethroid) and two neonicotinoid insecticides; Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam were selected to compare their efficacy against Chilo partellus and Atherigona soccata on maize crop under natural infestation during spring, winter and autumn seasons. All insecticides reduced Atherigona soccata and Chilo partellus infestation significantly (p<0.05). Imidacloprid and thiamethoxam were found statistically at par against Atherigona soccata and better than endosulfan. Permethrin and carbofuran were found statistically at par in first week and better than phorate while in second week permethrin and carbofuran were statistically at par but phorate was found better than them.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All insecticides significantly reduced shoot fly infestation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
All insecticidese0
Interactor
Atherigona soccataAtherigona soccatae0pest
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Atherigona soccata
Atherigona soccata · InteractorKhan, Kakar & Kamran (2024) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All insecticides reduced Atherigona soccata and Chilo partellus infestation significantly (p<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All insecticides significantly reduced stem borer infestation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
All insecticidese0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partelluse0pest
Outcome
Chilo partellus infestatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All insecticides reduced Atherigona soccata and Chilo partellus infestation significantly (p<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid and thiamethoxam had statistically similar efficacy against shoot fly and were better than endosulfan.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Imidacloprid and thiamethoxame0
Interactor
Atherigona soccataAtherigona soccatae0pest
Outcome
Atherigona soccatae0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
endosulfane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Atherigona soccata
Atherigona soccata · InteractorKhan, Kakar & Kamran (2024) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid and thiamethoxam were found statistically at par against Atherigona soccata and better than endosulfan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permethrin and carbofuran had similar efficacy in the first week and were better than phorate.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Permethrin and carbofurane0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
first weeke0
Comparator
phoratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Permethrin and carbofuran were found statistically at par in first week and better than phorate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second week, phorate was better than permethrin and carbofuran, which were statistically similar.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
phoratee0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
second weeke0
Comparator
permethrin and carbofurane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in second week permethrin and carbofuran were statistically at par but phorate was found better than them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · Atherigona soccata · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

insecticide · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

insecticide · Atherigona soccata · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.