Paper · 1997 · International Journal of Pest Management

Effect of time of application of chemicals on management of maize stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe)

R. N. Ganguli; R. N. Chaudhary; Jayalaxmi Ganguli

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

One of the major reasons for the low productivity of maize is damage by insect pests, notably the stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Investigations have been carried out to evaluate the efficacy of certain insecticides and neem-based formulations for the management of maize stem borer. Evaluation of the efficacy of 0.035% endosulfan for the management of maize stem borer at different stages of infestation has also been undertaken. The experiments were conducted in India during the monsoon season of 1993 and 1994. A single application of carbofuran 3G (at 7.5 kg/ha in leaf whorl) in a 15 day-old crop proved to be most effective in protecting against the borer, if the infestation occurs up to 6 days after application. Also, a single application of 0.035% endosulfan was highly effective in protecting the crop when applied 2 days after borer infestation and moderately effective when applied up to 6 days after borer infestation. Insecticidal spraying in later stages proved to be ineffective. Keywords: Stem BorerChilo PartellusManagementNeem-based FormulationsMaize Zea Mays

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran 3G at 7.5 kg/ha on 15-day-old maize most effectively protected against infestation up to six days later.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
carbofuran 3G (at 7.5 kg/ha in leaf whorl)e0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
Outcome
protecting against the borere0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single application of carbofuran 3G (at 7.5 kg/ha in leaf whorl) in a 15 day-old crop proved to be most effective in protecting against the borer, if the infestation occurs up to 6 days after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of time of application of chemicals on management of maize stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endosulfan applied two days after infestation was highly effective.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
0.035% endosulfane0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
Outcome
protecting the crope0
Direction
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single application of 0.035% endosulfan was highly effective in protecting the crop when applied 2 days after borer infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of time of application of chemicals on management of maize stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endosulfan applied within six days after infestation was moderately effective.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
0.035% endosulfane0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
Outcome
moderately effectivee0
Direction
moderately effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single application of 0.035% endosulfan was highly effective in protecting the crop when applied 2 days after borer infestation and moderately effective when applied up to 6 days after borer infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of time of application of chemicals on management of maize stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later insecticide spraying was ineffective.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Insecticidal spraying in later stagese0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
Outcome
ineffectivee0
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insecticidal spraying in later stages proved to be ineffective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of time of application of chemicals on management of maize stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑

carbofuran · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

endosulfan · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

insecticide · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.