Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during the Kharif season of 2024 at the Central Research Farm (CRF), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, India, to evaluate the effectiveness of various insecticidal treatments against Chilo partellus infestation in maize. The study was designed using a Randomized Block Design (RBD) comprising eight treatments with three replications each: T1 (Neem Oil 1% + Imidacloprid 17.8% SL), T2 (Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC + Azadirachtin 1500 ppm), T3 (Carbofuran 3G + Imidacloprid 17.8% SL), T4 (Imidacloprid 17.8% SL), T5 (Carbofuran 3G), T6 (Karanj Oil 3% + Imidacloprid 17.8% SL), T7 (Spinetoram 11.7% SC + Azadirachtin 1500 ppm), and an untreated control. Observations on larval population after the first and second sprays indicated that all treatments significantly reduced Chilo partellus infestation compared to the control. Among them, T7 (Spinetoram 11.7% SC + Azadirachtin 1500 ppm) was the most effective, recording the lowest larval population (2.22 and 1.36), followed by T2 (Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC + Azadirachtin 1500 ppm), T6 (Karanj Oil 3%+ Imidacloprid 17.8% SL), and T1 (Neem Oil 1% + Imidacloprid 17.8% SL). The least effective treatment was T5 (Carbofuran 3G), with the highest larval counts (3.53 and 2.46) after both sprays. These findings highlight the superior efficacy of Spinetoram 11.7% SC + Azadirachtin 1500 ppm in managing Chilo partellus under field conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
All insecticide treatments significantly reduced Chilo partellus infestation in maize compared with the control.
- Treatment
- insecticidal treatmentse1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellus
_Figure_27c.jpg?width=60)
Chilo partelluse1pest - Outcome
- Chilo partellus infestatione2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Qualifier
- after the first and second sprayse2
- Comparator
- controle2
- Setting
- Central Research Farm (CRF), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, Indiae0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_27c.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was carried out during the Kharif season of 2024 at the Central Research Farm (CRF), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, India”
e1“to evaluate the effectiveness of various insecticidal treatments against Chilo partellus infestation in maize”
e2“after the first and second sprays indicated that all treatments significantly reduced Chilo partellus infestation compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinetoram 11.7% SC + Azadirachtin 1500 ppm recorded the lowest larval population in maize (2.22 and 1.36).
- Treatment
- Spinetoram 11.7% SC + Azadirachtin 1500 ppme3
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partelluse1pest
- Outcome
- larval populatione3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Value
- 2.22 and 1.36e3
- Setting
- Central Research Farm (CRF), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, Indiae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was carried out during the Kharif season of 2024 at the Central Research Farm (CRF), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, India”
e1“to evaluate the effectiveness of various insecticidal treatments against Chilo partellus infestation in maize”
e3“T7 (Spinetoram 11.7% SC + Azadirachtin 1500 ppm) was the most effective, recording the lowest larval population (2.22 and 1.36)”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbofuran 3G had the highest larval counts in maize (3.53 and 2.46) and was the least effective treatment.
- Treatment
- Carbofuran 3Ge4
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partelluse1pest
- Outcome
- larval countse4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 3.53 and 2.46e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to evaluate the effectiveness of various insecticidal treatments against Chilo partellus infestation in maize”
e4“T5 (Carbofuran 3G), with the highest larval counts (3.53 and 2.46) after both sprays”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatments Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC + Azadirachtin 1500 ppm, Karanj Oil 3%+ Imidacloprid 17.8% SL and Neem Oil 1% + Imidacloprid 17.8% SL followed the best treatment in lowering larval population.
- Treatment
- T2 (Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC + Azadirachtin 1500 ppm), T6 (Karanj Oil 3%+ Imidacloprid 17.8% SL), and T1 (Neem Oil 1% + Imidacloprid 17.8% SL)e5
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partelluse1pest
- Outcome
- larval populatione5
- Direction
- lowerinferrede5
- Setting
- Central Research Farm (CRF), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, Indiae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was carried out during the Kharif season of 2024 at the Central Research Farm (CRF), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, India”
e1“to evaluate the effectiveness of various insecticidal treatments against Chilo partellus infestation in maize”
e5“recording the lowest larval population (2.22 and 1.36), followed by T2 (Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC + Azadirachtin 1500 ppm), T6 (Karanj Oil 3%+ Imidacloprid 17.8% SL), and T1 (Neem Oil 1% + Imidacloprid 17.8% SL)”
The same questions in other papers
carbofuran · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →chlorantraniliprole · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
azadirachtin · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →imidacloprid · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →insecticide · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →botanical · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.