Paper · 2017 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Efficacy of some biorational insecticides against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Maize

Jawala Jindal; Gurmail Singh Sandhu; Ravinder Kumar

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The efficacy data in terms of leaf injury, recorded at three weeks after spray, ranged from 7.6–13.3 and 4.6–11.9% in treated plots compared to 43.0 and 30.9% during 2014 and 2015, respectively. Further, deadheart incidence in the sprayed plots (1.0–3.3%) was significantly lower than in untreated control (17.1%) during 2014. Whereas, during 2015, the deadheart incidence was minimum in plots sprayed with flubendiamide 480 SC @ 50 ml/ha (1.5%) and was at par with its lower dose i.e. @ 25 ml/ha (2.6%), chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 100 ml/ha (1.6%), novaluron 10 EC @ 250 ml/ha @ (1.6%) and standard check deltamethrin 2.8 EC @ 200 ml/ha. The incidence in chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 75 ml/ha (3.8%) and novaluron 10 EC @ 187.5 ml/ha (5.9%) was moderate but significantly lower than control (19.9%). The grain yield of treated plots ranged from 56.7–62.8 and 49.6–56.3 q/ha against 49.9 & 39.4 q/ha in unsprayed plots during two years. As the grain yield in different doses of test insecticide was at par with standard check, so lower dose of insecticides, flubendiamide 480 SC @ 25 ml/ha, novaluron 10 EC @187.5 ml/ha and chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 75 ml/ha can be applied to effectively manage the pest as a component of integrated pest management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays reduced leaf injury in 2014.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
treated plotse0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
Outcome
leaf injurye0
Direction
comparede0
Value
7.6–13.3e0
Comparator
43.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The efficacy data in terms of leaf injury, recorded at three weeks after spray, ranged from 7.6–13.3 and 4.6–11.9% in treated plots compared to 43.0 and 30.9% during 2014 and 2015, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays reduced leaf injury in 2015.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
treated plotse0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
Outcome
leaf injurye0
Direction
comparede0
Value
4.6–11.9%e0
Comparator
30.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The efficacy data in terms of leaf injury, recorded at three weeks after spray, ranged from 7.6–13.3 and 4.6–11.9% in treated plots compared to 43.0 and 30.9% during 2014 and 2015, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays significantly lowered deadheart incidence in 2014.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
sprayed plotse0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
Outcome
deadheart incidencee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.0–3.3%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“deadheart incidence in the sprayed plots (1.0–3.3%) was significantly lower than in untreated control (17.1%) during 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide at 50 ml/ha yielded minimum deadheart incidence in 2015.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
flubendiamide 480 SC @ 50 ml/hae0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
Outcome
deadheart incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“deadheart incidence was minimum in plots sprayed with flubendiamide 480 SC @ 50 ml/ha (1.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole at 75 ml/ha gave moderate but significantly lower incidence than control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 75 ml/hae0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
Outcome
incidencee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
3.8%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The incidence in chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 75 ml/ha (3.8%) and novaluron 10 EC @ 187.5 ml/ha (5.9%) was moderate but significantly lower than control (19.9%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Novaluron at 187.5 ml/ha gave moderate but significantly lower incidence than control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
novaluron 10 EC @ 187.5 ml/hae0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
Outcome
incidencee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
5.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The incidence in chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 75 ml/ha (3.8%) and novaluron 10 EC @ 187.5 ml/ha (5.9%) was moderate but significantly lower than control (19.9%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated maize yielded more grain than unsprayed plots in 2014.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
treated plotse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
56.7–62.8e0
Comparator
unsprayed plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain yield of treated plots ranged from 56.7–62.8 and 49.6–56.3 q/ha against 49.9 & 39.4 q/ha in unsprayed plots during two years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated maize yielded more grain than unsprayed plots in 2015.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
treated plotse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
49.6–56.3 q/hae0
Comparator
unsprayed plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain yield of treated plots ranged from 56.7–62.8 and 49.6–56.3 q/ha against 49.9 & 39.4 q/ha in unsprayed plots during two years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–940 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend lower insecticide doses for pest management.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
effectively manage the peste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“lower dose of insecticides, flubendiamide 480 SC @ 25 ml/ha, novaluron 10 EC @187.5 ml/ha and chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 75 ml/ha can be applied to effectively manage the pest as a component of integrated pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1257 · show in text ↑

novaluron · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

flubendiamide · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.