Abstract
New environmentally safe insecticides with novel modes of action were evaluated for the management of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) on maize during kharif 2013 and 2014. Neem 1% (Neem ban) @ 500 mL ha−1, flubendiamide 480 SC (Fame), novaluron 10 EC (Rimon) and fipronil 5 SC (Regent), each @ 75, 100 and 125 mL ha−1 respectively along with deltamethrin 2.8 EC (Decis) @ 200 mL ha−1 as standard check were sprayed after 14 days of crop germination. The mean leaf injury incidence was on par at the respective doses in flubendiamide 480 SC (1.392.58%), novaluron 10 EC (2.01–2.94%) and fipronil 5 SC (2.36–3.67%) but significantly less than untreated control (9.58%). Mean dead heart incidence was on par at different doses in flubendiamide 480 SC (3.90–5.34%), novaluron 10 EC (4.93–6.93%) and fipronil 5 SC (5.59–7.20%) but significantly lower than the untreated control (14.09%). The dead heart incidence in neem formulation was 8.53%, which exhibited some degree of efficacy in comparison to untreated control. The grain yield was significantly better with the newer insecticide treatments (60.41--64.18 q ha−1) than neem formulation (57.18 q ha−1) and untreated control (54.58 q ha−1). These insecticides at the dose of 75 mL ha−1 could be utilized as effective tool in C. partellus management in maize.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide gave leaf injury incidence of 1.392.58%, significantly below untreated control.
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 480 SCe0
- Interactor
- Chilo partellus
_Figure_27c.jpg?width=60)
Chilo partellust0pest - Outcome
- leaf injury incidencee0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 1.392.58%e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_27c.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The mean leaf injury incidence was on par at the respective doses in flubendiamide 480 SC (1.392.58%), novaluron 10 EC (2.01–2.94%) and fipronil 5 SC (2.36–3.67%) but significantly less than untreated control (9.58%)”
t0“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Kharif Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Novaluron leaf injury incidence was 2.01–2.94%, significantly below untreated control.
- Treatment
- novaluron 10 ECe0
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- leaf injury incidencee0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 2.01–2.94%e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mean leaf injury incidence was on par at the respective doses in flubendiamide 480 SC (1.392.58%), novaluron 10 EC (2.01–2.94%) and fipronil 5 SC (2.36–3.67%) but significantly less than untreated control (9.58%)”
t0“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Kharif Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Fipronil leaf injury incidence was 2.36–3.67%, significantly below untreated control.
- Treatment
- fipronil 5 SCe0
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- leaf injury incidencee0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 2.36–3.67%e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mean leaf injury incidence was on par at the respective doses in flubendiamide 480 SC (1.392.58%), novaluron 10 EC (2.01–2.94%) and fipronil 5 SC (2.36–3.67%) but significantly less than untreated control (9.58%)”
t0“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Kharif Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide dead heart incidence was 3.90–5.34%, significantly lower than untreated control.
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 480 SCe0
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- dead heart incidencee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 3.90–5.34%e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mean dead heart incidence was on par at different doses in flubendiamide 480 SC (3.90–5.34%), novaluron 10 EC (4.93–6.93%) and fipronil 5 SC (5.59–7.20%) but significantly lower than the untreated control (14.09%)”
t0“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Kharif Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Novaluron dead heart incidence was 4.93–6.93%, significantly lower than untreated control.
- Treatment
- novaluron 10 ECe0
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- dead heart incidencee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 4.93–6.93%e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mean dead heart incidence was on par at different doses in flubendiamide 480 SC (3.90–5.34%), novaluron 10 EC (4.93–6.93%) and fipronil 5 SC (5.59–7.20%) but significantly lower than the untreated control (14.09%)”
t0“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Kharif Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Fipronil dead heart incidence was 5.59–7.20%, significantly lower than untreated control.
- Treatment
- fipronil 5 SCe0
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- dead heart incidencee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 5.59–7.20%e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mean dead heart incidence was on par at different doses in flubendiamide 480 SC (3.90–5.34%), novaluron 10 EC (4.93–6.93%) and fipronil 5 SC (5.59–7.20%) but significantly lower than the untreated control (14.09%)”
t0“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Kharif Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem formulation had dead heart incidence of 8.53% and some efficacy against untreated control.
- Treatment
- neem formulatione0
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- dead heart incidencee0
- Direction
- efficacye0
- Value
- 8.53%e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The dead heart incidence in neem formulation was 8.53%, which exhibited some degree of efficacy in comparison to untreated control”
t0“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Kharif Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Newer insecticides yielded 60.41--64.18 q ha−1, significantly better than neem and untreated control.
- Treatment
- newer insecticide treatmentse0
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 60.41--64.18 q ha−1e0
- Qualifier
- untreated control (54.58 q ha−1)e0
- Comparator
- neem formulatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain yield was significantly better with the newer insecticide treatments (60.41--64.18 q ha−1) than neem formulation (57.18 q ha−1) and untreated control (54.58 q ha−1)”
t0“Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Kharif Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 75 mL ha−1 of these insecticides for C. partellus management in maize.
- Treatment
- These insecticides at the dose of 75 mL ha−1e0
- Interactor
- C. partellusChilo partelluse0pest
- Outcome
- C. partellus managemente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These insecticides at the dose of 75 mL ha−1 could be utilized as effective tool in C. partellus management in maize”
The same questions in other papers
novaluron · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
flubendiamide · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fipronil · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →insecticide · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →botanical · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.