Paper · 2012 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Soil preparation and forage sowing time for crop-livestock integration in corn culture Preparos de solo e épocas de semeadura de forragem para integração lavoura-pecuária na cultura do milho

Luiz Fernando de Andrade Fritsch; Marco Antonio Camillo de Carvalho; Rivanildo Dallacort; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This work was carried out during the 2008/2009 crop season, in an Oxisol. It was used a split-plot arrangement design, with each plot corresponding to a different soil preparation system and each split-plot corresponding to a different sowing time of the forage Brachiaria brizantha Stapf. The soil preparation systems were: heavy harrowing (HH), disk plough (DP), chisel plough (CP) and no-till (NT), and the forage sowing times were: 0, 8, 16 and 25 days after sowing (DAS) of corn, arranged in 16 treatments with 3 replicates. The productive and vegetative characteristics of the corn were evaluated. Soil preparations have influenced plant height and the first ear height, with the highest value found for the heavy harrow treatment. Forage sowing time had no influence on vegetative characteristics of the corn and productive characteristics were not influenced by the soil preparations. The forage sowing time had influence on corn productivity, causing decrease in competition with corn forage from 5 DAS. The productivity was highly correlated with the number of grains per ear. Este trabalho foi desenvolvido, na safra 2008/2009, em Latossolo Vermelho-Amarelo, distrófico. Foi utilizado delineamento em parcelas subdivididas, em que cada parcela correspondeu a diferentes sistemas de preparo do solo e as subparcelas corresponderam a diferentes épocas de semeadura da forrageira Brachiaria brizantha Stapf. Os sistemas de preparo do solo foram os seguintes: grade aradora (GA), arado de discos (AD), cultivo mínimo (CM) e semeadura direta (SD); as épocas de semeadura da forrageira foram feitas a 0, 8, 16 e 25 dias após a semeadura do milho (DAS), totalizando 16 tratamentos, com três repetições. Avaliaram-se as características vegetativas e produtivas da cultura do milho. Os preparos de solo influenciaram a altura de plantas e de inserção da primeira espiga, sendo os maiores valores observados no tratamento com grade aradora; a época de semeadura da forrageira não teve influência sobre as características vegetativas; os diferentes preparos do solo não influenciaram as características produtivas. A época de semeadura da forrageira teve influência somente sobre a produtividade do milho, provocando diminuição da competição entre a forrageira e o milho a partir de cinco DAS. A produtividade foi altamente correlacionada com o número de grãos por espiga.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy harrowing produced the highest corn plant height.

Treatment
heavy harrow treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil preparations have influenced plant height and the first ear height, with the highest value found for the heavy harrow treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy harrowing produced the highest first ear height.

Treatment
heavy harrow treatmente0
Outcome
first ear heighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil preparations have influenced plant height and the first ear height, with the highest value found for the heavy harrow treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage sowing time did not affect corn vegetative characteristics.

Treatment
Forage sowing timee0
Interactor
Foragee0weed
Outcome
vegetative characteristicse0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forage sowing time had no influence on vegetative characteristics of the corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil preparation did not affect corn productive characteristics.

Treatment
soil preparationse0
Outcome
productive characteristicse0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productive characteristics were not influenced by the soil preparations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage sowing time affected corn productivity and reduced forage competition from five days after sowing.

Treatment
forage sowing timee0
Interactor
foragee0weed
Outcome
competition with corn foragee0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
from 5 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The forage sowing time had influence on corn productivity, causing decrease in competition with corn forage from 5 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1011 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn productivity was highly correlated with grain number per ear.

Outcome
productivitye0
Comparator
number of grains per eare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The productivity was highly correlated with the number of grains per ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑

sowing time · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.