Abstract
Abstract The feasibility of enhancing cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth or quality with an s‐triazine or substituted uracil compound was investigated. Repeated foliar application of 2‐chloro‐4,6‐bis(ethylamino)‐s‐triazine (simazine) at 0.06 to 0.48 kg/ha or soil incorporation of 0.22 to 0.90 kg/ha of simazine did not increase protein or oil production in seed of cotton when compared to untreated controls. Application of simazine had no effect on total yield or quality of lint. Terbacil (3‐terf‐butyl‐5‐chloro‐6‐methyluracil) was highly phytotoxic when applied foliarly to cotton at 0.006 kg/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Repeated foliar application of simazine did not increase protein or oil production in cotton seed compared with untreated controls
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- Repeated foliar application of 2‐chloro‐4,6‐bis(ethylamino)‐s‐triazine (simazine) at 0.06 to 0.48 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- protein or oil production in seede0
- Direction
- did not increasee0
- Comparator
- untreated controlse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton Yield and Quality”
e0“Repeated foliar application of 2‐chloro‐4,6‐bis(ethylamino)‐s‐triazine (simazine) at 0.06 to 0.48 kg/ha or soil incorporation of 0.22 to 0.90 kg/ha of simazine did not increase protein or oil production in seed of cotton”
e5“when compared to untreated controls”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil incorporation of simazine did not increase protein or oil production in cotton seed compared with untreated controls
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- soil incorporation of 0.22 to 0.90 kg/ha of simazinee4
- Outcome
- protein or oil production in seede4
- Direction
- did not increasee4
- Comparator
- untreated controlse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton Yield and Quality”
e4“soil incorporation of 0.22 to 0.90 kg/ha of simazine did not increase protein or oil production in seed of cotton”
e5“when compared to untreated controls”
Claim · model-written summary
Simazine application had no effect on total yield or quality of cotton lint
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Application of simazinee1
- Outcome
- total yield or quality of linte1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton Yield and Quality”
e1“Application of simazine had no effect on total yield or quality of lint”
Claim · model-written summary
Terbacil was highly phytotoxic to cotton when applied foliarly at 0.006 kg/ha
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume2
- Treatment
- Terbacile3
- Outcome
- phytotoxice2
- Direction
- highlye2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“was highly phytotoxic when applied foliarly to cotton at 0.006 kg/ha”
e3“Terbacil (3‐terf‐butyl‐5‐chloro‐6‐methyluracil)”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: protein · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.