Paper · 2022 · Molecules

Effects of Salicylic Acid Concentration and Post-Treatment Time on the Direct and Systemic Chemical Defense Responses in Maize (Zea mays L.) Following Exogenous Foliar Application

Yuanjiao Feng; Xiaoyi Wang; Tiantian Du; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salicylic acid (SA) plays a critical role in allergic reactions of plants to pathogens and acquired systemic resistance. Thus far, although some research has been conducted on the direct effects of different concentrations of SA on the chemical defense response of treated plant parts (leaves) after at multiple post-treatments times, few research has reported on the systematic effects of non-treated parts (roots). Therefore, we examined direct and systemic effects of SA concentration and time following foliar application on chemical defense responses in maize variety 5422 with two fully expanded leaves. In the experiments, maize leaves were treated with different SA concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0 mM, and then, the presence of defense chemicals and enzymes in treated leaves and non-treated roots was measured at different time points of 3, 12, 24, 48, 72 h following SA foliar application. The results showed that direct and systemic effects of SA treatment to the leaf on chemical defense responses were related to SA concentration and time of measurement after spraying SA. In treated leaves, total phenolics content increased directly by 28.65% at the time point of 12 h following foliar application of 0.5 mM SA. DIMBOA (2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-2H, 1, 4-benzoxazin-3 (4H)-one) content was directly enhanced by 80.56~551.05% after 3~72 h following 0.5~5.0 mM SA treatments. Polyphenol oxidase and superoxide dismutase activities were directly enhanced after 12~72 h following 0.5~5.0 mM SA treatments, whereas peroxidase and catalase activities were increased after 3~24 h following application of 1.0~5.0 mM SA. In non-treated roots, DIMBOA content and polyphenol oxidase activity were enhanced systematically after 3~48 h following 1.0~5.0 mM SA foliar treatments. Superoxide dismutase activities were enhanced after 3~24 h following 0.5~2.5 mM SA applications, but total phenolics content, peroxidase and catalase activity decreased in some particular concentrations or at the different times of measurement in the SA treatment. It can be concluded that SA foliar application at 1.0 and 2.5 mM produces strong chemical defense responses in maize, with the optimal induction time being 24 h following the foliar application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SA defense responses varied with concentration and measurement time.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
chemical defense responsese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“direct and systemic effects of SA treatment to the leaf on chemical defense responses were related to SA concentration and time of measurement after spraying SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 h, 0.5 mM SA increased leaf total phenolics by 28.65%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
treated leavese0
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
total phenolics contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In treated leaves, total phenolics content increased directly by 28.65% at the time point of 12 h following foliar application of 0.5 mM SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA increased leaf DIMBOA content by 80.56~551.05% over 3~72 h.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
DIMBOA (2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-2H, 1, 4-benzoxazin-3 (4H)-one) contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
80.56~551.05%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DIMBOA (2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-2H, 1, 4-benzoxazin-3 (4H)-one) content was directly enhanced by 80.56~551.05% after 3~72 h following 0.5~5.0 mM SA treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA enhanced leaf polyphenol oxidase and superoxide dismutase activities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
Polyphenol oxidase and superoxide dismutase activitiese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polyphenol oxidase and superoxide dismutase activities were directly enhanced after 12~72 h following 0.5~5.0 mM SA treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA increased leaf peroxidase and catalase activities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
peroxidase and catalase activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peroxidase and catalase activities were increased after 3~24 h following application of 1.0~5.0 mM SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SA enhanced root DIMBOA content and polyphenol oxidase activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
non-treated rootse0
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
DIMBOA content and polyphenol oxidase activitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In non-treated roots, DIMBOA content and polyphenol oxidase activity were enhanced systematically after 3~48 h following 1.0~5.0 mM SA foliar treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1788 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SA enhanced root superoxide dismutase activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
Superoxide dismutase activitiese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superoxide dismutase activities were enhanced after 3~24 h following 0.5~2.5 mM SA applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1790–1885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some SA conditions decreased root total phenolics content, peroxidase and catalase activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
total phenolics content, peroxidase and catalase activitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total phenolics content, peroxidase and catalase activity decreased in some particular concentrations or at the different times of measurement in the SA treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1891–2053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified 1.0 and 2.5 mM SA and 24 h as strong defense induction conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
SA foliar application at 1.0 and 2.5 mMe0
Outcome
strong chemical defense responsese0
Value
24 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA foliar application at 1.0 and 2.5 mM produces strong chemical defense responses in maize, with the optimal induction time being 24 h following the foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2080–2248 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

31 papers: 30 positive, 1 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

salicylic acid · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

salicylic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.