Abstract
Salicylic acid (SA) plays a critical role in allergic reactions of plants to pathogens and acquired systemic resistance. Thus far, although some research has been conducted on the direct effects of different concentrations of SA on the chemical defense response of treated plant parts (leaves) after at multiple post-treatments times, few research has reported on the systematic effects of non-treated parts (roots). Therefore, we examined direct and systemic effects of SA concentration and time following foliar application on chemical defense responses in maize variety 5422 with two fully expanded leaves. In the experiments, maize leaves were treated with different SA concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0 mM, and then, the presence of defense chemicals and enzymes in treated leaves and non-treated roots was measured at different time points of 3, 12, 24, 48, 72 h following SA foliar application. The results showed that direct and systemic effects of SA treatment to the leaf on chemical defense responses were related to SA concentration and time of measurement after spraying SA. In treated leaves, total phenolics content increased directly by 28.65% at the time point of 12 h following foliar application of 0.5 mM SA. DIMBOA (2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-2H, 1, 4-benzoxazin-3 (4H)-one) content was directly enhanced by 80.56~551.05% after 3~72 h following 0.5~5.0 mM SA treatments. Polyphenol oxidase and superoxide dismutase activities were directly enhanced after 12~72 h following 0.5~5.0 mM SA treatments, whereas peroxidase and catalase activities were increased after 3~24 h following application of 1.0~5.0 mM SA. In non-treated roots, DIMBOA content and polyphenol oxidase activity were enhanced systematically after 3~48 h following 1.0~5.0 mM SA foliar treatments. Superoxide dismutase activities were enhanced after 3~24 h following 0.5~2.5 mM SA applications, but total phenolics content, peroxidase and catalase activity decreased in some particular concentrations or at the different times of measurement in the SA treatment. It can be concluded that SA foliar application at 1.0 and 2.5 mM produces strong chemical defense responses in maize, with the optimal induction time being 24 h following the foliar application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar SA defense responses varied with concentration and measurement time.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“direct and systemic effects of SA treatment to the leaf on chemical defense responses were related to SA concentration and time of measurement after spraying SA”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
At 12 h, 0.5 mM SA increased leaf total phenolics by 28.65%.
- Organ / stage
- treated leavese0
- Treatment
- SAe0
- Outcome
- total phenolics contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 28.65%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In treated leaves, total phenolics content increased directly by 28.65% at the time point of 12 h following foliar application of 0.5 mM SA”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
SA increased leaf DIMBOA content by 80.56~551.05% over 3~72 h.
- Treatment
- SAe0
- Outcome
- DIMBOA (2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-2H, 1, 4-benzoxazin-3 (4H)-one) contente0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 80.56~551.05%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“DIMBOA (2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-2H, 1, 4-benzoxazin-3 (4H)-one) content was directly enhanced by 80.56~551.05% after 3~72 h following 0.5~5.0 mM SA treatments”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
SA enhanced leaf polyphenol oxidase and superoxide dismutase activities.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Polyphenol oxidase and superoxide dismutase activities were directly enhanced after 12~72 h following 0.5~5.0 mM SA treatments”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
SA increased leaf peroxidase and catalase activities.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“peroxidase and catalase activities were increased after 3~24 h following application of 1.0~5.0 mM SA”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar SA enhanced root DIMBOA content and polyphenol oxidase activity.
- Organ / stage
- non-treated rootse0
- Treatment
- SAe0
- Outcome
- DIMBOA content and polyphenol oxidase activitye0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In non-treated roots, DIMBOA content and polyphenol oxidase activity were enhanced systematically after 3~48 h following 1.0~5.0 mM SA foliar treatments”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar SA enhanced root superoxide dismutase activity.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Superoxide dismutase activities were enhanced after 3~24 h following 0.5~2.5 mM SA applications”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Some SA conditions decreased root total phenolics content, peroxidase and catalase activity.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“total phenolics content, peroxidase and catalase activity decreased in some particular concentrations or at the different times of measurement in the SA treatment”
t0“Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors identified 1.0 and 2.5 mM SA and 24 h as strong defense induction conditions.
- Treatment
- SA foliar application at 1.0 and 2.5 mMe0
- Outcome
- strong chemical defense responsese0
- Value
- 24 he0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“SA foliar application at 1.0 and 2.5 mM produces strong chemical defense responses in maize, with the optimal induction time being 24 h following the foliar application”
The same questions in other papers
salicylic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →salicylic acid · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →salicylic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.