Paper · 2021 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effects of fertilizer types on the agronomic, forage yield and nutritional value of forage oat accessions in the highlands of Ethiopia

Getahun Worku; Bimrew Asmare; Yeshambel Mekuriaw

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands. This study employed randomized complete block design (RCBD) using 3 by 3 factorial with three replications. The forage oat accessions used in the study were: CI8251, CI8237 and Jassari and the three fertilizer types used were inorganic (NPK), organic (compost) and without fertilizer. The data collected from the study includes: plant morphological parameters such as plant height (PH), leaf length (LL), number of leaves per plant (LNPP), number of tillers per plant (NTPP), forage dry matter (DM) yield and chemical composition of the forage. The collected data were analyzed with general linear model (GLM) of statistical analysis system (SAS) version 9.4 and mean separation was done with Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. The result indicated most of the morphological parameters were not significantly affected by the effects of fertilizer type while oat accession had also effect on these factors. While in terms of forage yield accession CI8251 showed the forage DM yield increment as compared to other varieties. Regarding fertilizer application, there was significant different (P<0.0001) among fertilizer types in all morphological parameters. Among chemical composition parameters dry matter (DM), DM yiedl, organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), CP yield, ASH, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) were significantly different (P<0.0001), for both fertilizer and oat accessions. The highest CP content was observed for the treatments received chemical fertilizer (NPK) which was 11%CP followed by the intermediate CP value that was 10% due to compost application but the least CP (9%) was recorded for the control. It can be concluded, that the addition of inorganic and organic fertilizer with the grass species in the present study improved oat accession morphological characteristics which could be a reflection of biomass yield and also the nutritional value of oat grass in this experiment. The application of compost could be a second alternative for oat producers with no access of artificial fertilizer. From the effect of accession, it is possible to conclude that the intermediate accession was better in terms of yield and overall performance. Of the oat accessions assessed, CI825 was selected in terms of DM yield and CP contents followed by plant CI8237 and Jassari in the current study area. Regarding fertilizer it is possible to generalize that maximum biomass yield and improved quality can be obtained using NPK fertilizer if it is accessible by smallholder farmers. However, if the NPK is not accessible, the use of compost could be an alternative to produce good quality oat fodder with optimum yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer type did not significantly affect most morphological parameters of forage oat.

Treatment
fertilizer typee1
Outcome
morphological parameterse1
Direction
not significantly affectede1
Setting
Ethiopian highlandse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“most of the morphological parameters were not significantly affected by the effects of fertilizer type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1053 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat accession affected the morphological parameters of forage oat.

Material
oat accessione2
Outcome
morphological parameterse1
Direction
had also effecte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“most of the morphological parameters were not significantly affected by the effects of fertilizer type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1053 · show in text ↑
e2

“while oat accession had also effect on these factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accession CI8251 showed a forage DM yield increment compared with other oat varieties.

Material
CI8251e3
Outcome
forage DM yielde3
Direction
incremente3
Comparator
other varietiese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e3

“While in terms of forage yield accession CI8251 showed the forage DM yield increment as compared to other varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1223 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer types differed significantly in all morphological parameters of oat.

Treatment
fertilizer typese4
Outcome
morphological parameterse4
Value
P<0.0001e4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e4

“Regarding fertilizer application, there was significant different (P<0.0001) among fertilizer types in all morphological parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1356 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter, DM yield and organic matter differed significantly between fertilizer and oat accession treatments.

Treatment
fertilizer and oat accessionse5
Outcome
dry matter (DM), DM yiedl, organic matter (OM)e5
Value
P<0.0001e5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e5

“Among chemical composition parameters dry matter (DM), DM yiedl, organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), CP yield, ASH, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) were significantly different (P<0.0001), for both fertilizer and oat accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1648 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein, CP yield and ash differed significantly between fertilizer and oat accession treatments.

Treatment
fertilizer and oat accessionse5
Outcome
crude protein (CP), CP yield, ASHe5
Value
P<0.0001e5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e5

“Among chemical composition parameters dry matter (DM), DM yiedl, organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), CP yield, ASH, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) were significantly different (P<0.0001), for both fertilizer and oat accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1648 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber and acid detergent lignin differed significantly between fertilizer and oat accession treatments.

Treatment
fertilizer and oat accessionse5
Outcome
neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL)e5
Value
P<0.0001e5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e5

“Among chemical composition parameters dry matter (DM), DM yiedl, organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), CP yield, ASH, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) were significantly different (P<0.0001), for both fertilizer and oat accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizer gave the highest crude protein content of oat (11%) compared with compost.

Treatment
chemical fertilizer (NPK)e6
Outcome
CP contente6
Direction
higheste6
Value
11%CPe6
Comparator
compost applicatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e6

“The highest CP content was observed for the treatments received chemical fertilizer (NPK) which was 11%CP followed by the intermediate CP value that was 10% due to compost application but the least CP (9%) was recorded for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost application gave an intermediate crude protein value of oat (10%) compared with NPK fertilizer.

Treatment
compost applicatione6
Outcome
CP valuee6
Direction
intermediatee6
Value
10%e6
Comparator
chemical fertilizer (NPK)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e6

“The highest CP content was observed for the treatments received chemical fertilizer (NPK) which was 11%CP followed by the intermediate CP value that was 10% due to compost application but the least CP (9%) was recorded for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1884 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the least crude protein content of oat (9%).

Outcome
CPe6
Direction
leaste6
Value
9%e6
Comparator
the controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e6

“The highest CP content was observed for the treatments received chemical fertilizer (NPK) which was 11%CP followed by the intermediate CP value that was 10% due to compost application but the least CP (9%) was recorded for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1884 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Compost could be a second alternative for oat producers without access to artificial fertilizer.

Treatment
application of composte1
Outcome
second alternativee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of compost could be a second alternative for oat producers with no access of artificial fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2167–2281 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intermediate oat accession was better in yield and overall performance.

Material
intermediate accessione1
Outcome
yield and overall performancee1
Direction
bettere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“From the effect of accession, it is possible to conclude that the intermediate accession was better in terms of yield and overall performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2283–2424 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Accession CI825 was selected among the assessed oat accessions for DM yield and CP contents.

Material
CI825e1
Outcome
DM yield and CP contentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“Of the oat accessions assessed, CI825 was selected in terms of DM yield and CP contents followed by plant CI8237 and Jassari in the current study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2426–2576 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizer can give maximum biomass yield and improved quality of oat if farmers can access it.

Treatment
NPK fertilizere1
Outcome
biomass yield and improved qualitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regarding fertilizer it is possible to generalize that maximum biomass yield and improved quality can be obtained using NPK fertilizer if it is accessible by smallholder farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2578–2755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding inorganic and organic fertilizer improved the morphological characteristics of oat accessions, as the authors conclude.

Treatment
addition of inorganic and organic fertilizere7
Outcome
morphological characteristicse7
Direction
improvede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of fertilizer type and oat accessions on agronomic performance, forage yield and chemical composition under acidic soil conditions of Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e7

“It can be concluded, that the addition of inorganic and organic fertilizer with the grass species in the present study improved oat accession morphological characteristics which could be a reflection of biomass yield and also the nutritional value of oat grass in this experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–2165 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.