Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Using Post-Emergence Herbicides in Combination with the Sowing Date to Suppress Sinapis arvensis and Silybum marianum in Durum Wheat

Anestis Karkanis; Athanasios Angou; Despoina Athanasiadou; et al.

14
claims
31
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) and milk thistle (Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn.) are two competitive broad-leaved weeds commonly found in cereals in Europe, while several weed species have developed resistance to the main herbicides that are applied on these crops. Thus, the implementation of integrated weed management (IWM) programs is of great importance. Field experiments were conducted based on a split-plot design with two factors (sowing date and herbicides). Our results showed that the density of wild mustard and milk thistle was higher in the early sowing compared to the late sowing, while the total weed density was up to 75% higher in early sowing. Moreover, the herbicides florasulam + 2.4-D and bromoxynil + 2.4-D exhibited high efficacy (>98%) against milk thistle and wild mustard, while tribenuron-methyl and florasulam + clopyralid provided greater efficacy in the late sowing compared to the early sowing. Among the four herbicides, the lowest dry biomass and grain yield of wheat were observed in tribenuron-methyl and florasulam + clopyralid, while in the weed-infested treatment, the highest values of both parameters were recorded in late sowing. Finally, the results showed that the sowing date is a cultural weed control method that should be implemented in IWM programs, since it can affect both weed density and herbicide efficacy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild mustard density was higher under early than late sowing.

Treatment
early sowinge0
Interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
density of wild mustarde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
late sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the density of wild mustard and milk thistle was higher in the early sowing compared to the late sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milk thistle density was higher under early than late sowing.

Treatment
early sowinge0
Interactor
milk thistleSilybum marianume0weed
Outcome
density of wild mustard and milk thistlee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
late sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Silybum marianum
Silybum marianum · InteractorZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the density of wild mustard and milk thistle was higher in the early sowing compared to the late sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total weed density was up to 75% higher under early sowing.

Treatment
early sowinge0
Outcome
total weed densitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
late sowinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total weed density was up to 75% higher in early sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–666 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher in the early sowing compared to the late sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Florasulam + 2.4-D had over 98% efficacy against milk thistle and wild mustard.

Treatment
florasulam + 2.4-De0
Interactor
milk thistleSilybum marianume0weed
Second interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
highe0
Value
>98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Silybum marianum
Silybum marianum · InteractorZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the herbicides florasulam + 2.4-D and bromoxynil + 2.4-D exhibited high efficacy (>98%) against milk thistle and wild mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bromoxynil + 2.4-D had over 98% efficacy against milk thistle and wild mustard.

Treatment
bromoxynil + 2.4-De0
Interactor
milk thistleSilybum marianume0weed
Second interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
highe0
Value
>98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Silybum marianum
Silybum marianum · InteractorZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the herbicides florasulam + 2.4-D and bromoxynil + 2.4-D exhibited high efficacy (>98%) against milk thistle and wild mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tribenuron-methyl efficacy was greater under late than early sowing.

Treatment
tribenuron-methyle0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
late sowinge0
Comparator
early sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tribenuron-methyl and florasulam + clopyralid provided greater efficacy in the late sowing compared to the early sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Florasulam + clopyralid efficacy was greater under late than early sowing.

Treatment
florasulam + clopyralide0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
late sowinge0
Comparator
early sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tribenuron-methyl and florasulam + clopyralid provided greater efficacy in the late sowing compared to the early sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat dry biomass was lowest under tribenuron-methyl.

Treatment
tribenuron-methyle0
Outcome
dry biomasse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest dry biomass and grain yield of wheat were observed in tribenuron-methyl and florasulam + clopyralid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was lowest under tribenuron-methyl.

Treatment
tribenuron-methyle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest dry biomass and grain yield of wheat were observed in tribenuron-methyl and florasulam + clopyralid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat dry biomass was lowest under florasulam + clopyralid.

Treatment
florasulam + clopyralide0
Outcome
dry biomasse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest dry biomass and grain yield of wheat were observed in tribenuron-methyl and florasulam + clopyralid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was lowest under florasulam + clopyralid.

Treatment
florasulam + clopyralide0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest dry biomass and grain yield of wheat were observed in tribenuron-methyl and florasulam + clopyralid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In weed-infested plots, wheat dry biomass was highest with late sowing.

Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
highest values of both parameterse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
weed-infested treatmente0
Comparator
early sowinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the weed-infested treatment, the highest values of both parameters were recorded in late sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1175 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher in the early sowing compared to the late sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In weed-infested plots, wheat grain yield was highest with late sowing.

Treatment
late sowinge0
Outcome
highest values of both parameterse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
weed-infested treatmente0
Comparator
early sowinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the weed-infested treatment, the highest values of both parameters were recorded in late sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1175 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher in the early sowing compared to the late sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sowing date as a cultural control in integrated weed management.

Outcome
sowing date is a cultural weed control method that should be implemented in IWM programse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sowing date is a cultural weed control method that should be implemented in IWM programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–132 · show in text ↑

clopyralid · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Florasulam · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.