Paper · 2022 · European Journal of Plant Pathology

Disease threshold-based fungicide applications: potential of multi-disease resistance in winter wheat cultivars in Germany

Bettina Klocke; Nicole Sommerfeldt; Christina Wagner; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The presence of foliar pathogens often leads to yield losses in winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), the most important crop in Germany. In this study the efficacy of different host resistance levels of eight wheat cultivars and three fungicide strategies on fungal disease control was studied in terms of yield and net return in field trials at five sites over three crop years. Fungicide treatments included a situation-related strategy in which cultivars were treated individually based on disease control thresholds, a practice-related strategy in which all cultivars were treated after disease thresholds had been exceeded in one cultivar, and an untreated control. Disease severity and incidence differed between cultivars and were reduced by fungicide treatments compared to the untreated control. On average over all locations and years, the Fungicide Treatment Frequency Index (TFI) of all cultivars treated with the situation-related strategy was significantly lower than those treated with the practice-related strategy, except the highly susceptible cultivar JB Asano. A reduction of the TFI by up to 82% was possible in the situation-related strategy. Despite slightly increased yields in the practice-related strategy compared to the situation-related strategy, these could not compensate for the higher fungicide costs in most cases and led to lower net returns. The cultivars with multi-disease resistance showed clear advantages. Their potential benefits are not only demonstrated by the attainment of high yields, but also in fungicide savings without reducing net returns, provided that their disease resistance characteristics are taken into account.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity and incidence differed among wheat cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
Disease severity and incidencee0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease severity and incidence differed between cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–738 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatments reduced disease severity and incidence relative to untreated controls.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
fungicide treatmentse0
Outcome
Disease severity and incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease severity and incidence differed between cultivars and were reduced by fungicide treatments compared to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–814 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Situation-related treatment gave significantly lower fungicide frequency than practice-related treatment except in JB Asano.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
JB Asanoe0
Treatment
situation-related strategye0
Outcome
Fungicide Treatment Frequency Index (TFI)e0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
except the highly susceptible cultivar JB Asanoe0
Comparator
practice-related strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fungicide Treatment Frequency Index (TFI) of all cultivars treated with the situation-related strategy was significantly lower than those treated with the practice-related strategy, except the highly susceptible cultivar JB Asano”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1089 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Situation-related treatment could reduce fungicide frequency by up to 82%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
situation-related strategye0
Outcome
TFIe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
up to 82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A reduction of the TFI by up to 82% was possible in the situation-related strategy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1174 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Practice-related treatment produced slightly higher yields than situation-related treatment.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
practice-related strategye0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
situation-related strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slightly increased yields in the practice-related strategy compared to the situation-related strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Practice-related treatment produced lower net returns in most cases because higher fungicide costs outweighed yield gains.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
practice-related strategye1
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
in most casese0
Comparator
situation-related strategye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these could not compensate for the higher fungicide costs in most cases and led to lower net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1386 · show in text ↑
e1

“practice-related strategy compared to the situation-related strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1284 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multi-disease-resistant cultivars attained high yields.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
cultivars with multi-disease resistancee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivars with multi-disease resistance showed clear advantages. Their potential benefits are not only demonstrated by the attainment of high yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1540 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multi-disease-resistant cultivars saved fungicide without reducing net returns when resistance characteristics were considered.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material
cultivars with multi-disease resistancee1
Outcome
fungicide savings without reducing net returnse0
Qualifier
provided that their disease resistance characteristics are taken into accounte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungicide savings without reducing net returns, provided that their disease resistance characteristics are taken into account”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1679 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cultivars with multi-disease resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1431 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–109 · show in text ↑

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.