Abstract
The aim of the research was to evaluate the effect of three different methods of soil cultivation for the forecrop on the yield and protein content in winter triticale grain depending on the amount of mineral nitrogen used. The yield of winter triticale grain depended the most on the distribution and sum of rainfall and on the doses of mineral N. A significant impact of the increasing total amount of rain and the distribution of precipitation in the years and months of the research on most of the studied features of triticale was found. The average triticale grain yield and protein content were significantly higher when soybean forecrop was grown using the reduced and strip-till method than after traditional plow cultivation. N doses from 60 to 180 kg ha–1 had the highest, but, on average, insignificantly differentiated impact on the yielding of triticale in the years of the study. N fertilization did not differentiate the number of spike-bearing stalks or the weight of 1000 grains. The triticale yield and protein content increased significantly up to the dose of 120 kg N ha–1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Triticale grain yield depended most on rainfall distribution and total and mineral nitrogen dose.
- Taxon
- winter triticale
×Triticosecalet0 - Treatment
- doses of mineral Ne0
- Outcome
- yield of winter triticale graine0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield of winter triticale grain depended the most on the distribution and sum of rainfall and on the doses of mineral N”
t0“winter triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing rainfall amount and its temporal distribution significantly affected most studied triticale features.
- Taxon
- winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- most of the studied features of triticalee0
- Setting
- the years and months of the researche0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A significant impact of the increasing total amount of rain and the distribution of precipitation in the years and months of the research on most of the studied features of triticale was found”
t0“winter triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Reduced tillage for the soybean forecrop produced significantly higher average triticale grain yield than plow cultivation.
- Taxon
- winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- reducede0
- Outcome
- triticale grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- traditional plow cultivatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average triticale grain yield and protein content were significantly higher when soybean forecrop was grown using the reduced and strip-till method than after traditional plow cultivation”
t0“winter triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Strip tillage for the soybean forecrop produced significantly higher average triticale grain yield than plow cultivation.
- Taxon
- winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- strip-till methode0
- Outcome
- triticale grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- traditional plow cultivatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average triticale grain yield and protein content were significantly higher when soybean forecrop was grown using the reduced and strip-till method than after traditional plow cultivation”
t0“winter triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Reduced tillage for the soybean forecrop produced significantly higher triticale grain protein than plow cultivation.
- Taxon
- winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- reducede0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- traditional plow cultivatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average triticale grain yield and protein content were significantly higher when soybean forecrop was grown using the reduced and strip-till method than after traditional plow cultivation”
t0“winter triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Strip tillage for the soybean forecrop produced significantly higher triticale grain protein than plow cultivation.
- Taxon
- winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- strip-till methode0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- traditional plow cultivatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average triticale grain yield and protein content were significantly higher when soybean forecrop was grown using the reduced and strip-till method than after traditional plow cultivation”
t0“winter triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen doses of 60 to 180 kg ha–1 had the largest but statistically insignificant differences in triticale yield.
- Taxon
- winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- N doses from 60 to 180 kg ha–1e0
- Outcome
- yielding of triticalee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N doses from 60 to 180 kg ha–1 had the highest, but, on average, insignificantly differentiated impact on the yielding of triticale in the years of the study”
t0“winter triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilization did not differentiate the number of spike-bearing stalks.
- Taxon
- winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- N fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- number of spike-bearing stalkse0
- Direction
- did not differentiatee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N fertilization did not differentiate the number of spike-bearing stalks or the weight of 1000 grains”
t0“winter triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilization did not differentiate 1000-grain weight.
- Taxon
- winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- N fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- weight of 1000 grainse0
- Direction
- did not differentiatee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N fertilization did not differentiate the number of spike-bearing stalks or the weight of 1000 grains”
t0“winter triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Triticale yield increased significantly up to 120 kg N ha–1.
- Taxon
- winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- dose of 120 kg N ha–1e0
- Outcome
- triticale yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The triticale yield and protein content increased significantly up to the dose of 120 kg N ha–1”
t0“winter triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Triticale protein content increased significantly up to 120 kg N ha–1.
- Taxon
- winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- dose of 120 kg N ha–1e0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The triticale yield and protein content increased significantly up to the dose of 120 kg N ha–1”
t0“winter triticale”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →tillage · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →nitrogen · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →tillage · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
nitrogen · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.