Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Melon/cowpea intercropping pattern influenced the N and C soil cycling and the abundance of soil rare bacterial taxa

Jessica Cuartero; Jose Antonio Pascual; Juana-María Vivo; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The high use of pesticides, herbicides, and unsustainable farming practices resulted in losses of soil quality. Sustainable farming practices such as intercropping could be a good alternative to traditional monocrop, especially using legumes such as cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata L. Walp ). In this study, different melon and cowpea intercropping patterns (melon mixed with cowpea in the same row (MC1); alternating one melon row and one cowpea row (MC2); alternating two melon rows and one cowpea row (MC3)) were assayed to study the intercropping effect on soil bacterial community through 16S rRNA region in a 3-year experiment. The results indicated that intercropping showed high content of total organic carbon, total nitrogen and ammonium, melon yield, and bacterial diversity as well as higher levels of beneficial soil microorganisms such a Pseudomonas, Aeromicrobium, Niastella , or Sphingomonas which can promote plant growth and plant defense against pathogens. Furthermore, intercropping showed a higher rare taxa diversity in two (MC1 and MC2) out of the three intercropping systems. In addition, N-cycling genes such as nirB, nosZ , and amoA were more abundant in MC1 and MC2 whereas the narG predicted gene was far more abundant in the intercropping systems than in the monocrop at the end of the 3-year experiment. This research fills a gap in knowledge about the importance of soil bacteria in an intercropping melon/cowpea pattern, showing the benefits to yield and soil quality with a decrease in N fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased soil total organic carbon, total nitrogen and ammonium.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
total organic carbon, total nitrogen and ammoniume0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping showed high content of total organic carbon, total nitrogen and ammonium, melon yield, and bacterial diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased melon yield.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
melon yielde0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping showed high content of total organic carbon, total nitrogen and ammonium, melon yield, and bacterial diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased bacterial diversity.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
bacterial diversitye0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping showed high content of total organic carbon, total nitrogen and ammonium, melon yield, and bacterial diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased levels of several beneficial soil microorganisms.

Outcome
levels of beneficial soil microorganismse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Pseudomonas, Aeromicrobium, Niastella , or Sphingomonase0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher levels of beneficial soil microorganisms such a Pseudomonas, Aeromicrobium, Niastella , or Sphingomonas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–902 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MC1 and MC2 had higher rare taxa diversity.

Treatment
MC1 and MC2e0
Outcome
rare taxa diversitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping showed a higher rare taxa diversity in two (MC1 and MC2) out of the three intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1093 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-cycling genes nirB, nosZ and amoA were more abundant in MC1 and MC2.

Treatment
MC1 and MC2e0
Gene
nirB, nosZ , and amoAe0
Outcome
N-cycling genese0
Direction
more abundante0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“N-cycling genes such as nirB, nosZ , and amoA were more abundant in MC1 and MC2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The predicted narG gene was more abundant in intercropping than monocropping after three years.

Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Gene
narGe0
Outcome
narG predicted genee0
Direction
far more abundante0
Qualifier
at the end of the 3-year experimente0
Comparator
monocrope0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the narG predicted gene was far more abundant in the intercropping systems than in the monocrop at the end of the 3-year experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1327 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

intercropping · soil: biology · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.