Paper · 2022 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

A first-year melon/cowpea intercropping system improves soil nutrients and changes the soil microbial community

Cuartero, Jessica; Pascual, Jose Antonio; Vivo, Juana-Mari; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The melon/cowpea intercropping system can be a specific and efficient cropping pattern in a horticultural field. Intercropping systems contribute to the optimization of land use, fostering sustainable and efficient agriculture. This study entails a first-year comparative intercropping assay using cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and melon (Cucumis melo) under organic management with different patterns and 30% less organic fertilization than usual in monocrops. We determined the soil nutrients, physicochemical properties, enzyme activities and microbes by high-throughput sequencing. We found that the intercropping system changed the bacterial community structure independently of the intercropping pattern. The bacterial community was characterized by a higher abundance of the phyla Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes phyla and of the genus Pseudomonas, which are related to nutrient cycling, and by greater amounts of other beneficial microorganisms like Bacillus, Streptomyces and Sphingomonas. The intercropped systems significantly boosted the total nitrogen, available phosphorus and total organic carbon levels in addition to the melon yield. They also enhanced the acid phosphatase and β-glucosidase activity compared to the melon monocrop. Results from this study suggest that melon/cowpea intercropping, starting from the first year, not only provides a stable supply of food and income due to the diversified cropping systems, but is also beneficial for the soil microbial community and environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping changed soil bacterial community structure independently of pattern.

Treatment
intercropping systeme0
Outcome
bacterial community structuree0
Direction
changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We found that the intercropping system changed the bacterial community structure independently of the intercropping pattern.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon/cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping was associated with higher Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Pseudomonas abundance.

Outcome
higher abundance of the phyla Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes phyla and of the genus Pseudomonase0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial community was characterized by a higher abundance of the phyla Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes phyla and of the genus Pseudomonas, which are related to nutrient cycling, and by greater amounts of other beneficial microorganisms like Bacillus, Streptomyces and Sphingomonas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon/cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other beneficial microorganisms Bacillus, Streptomyces and Sphingomonas were more abundant.

Outcome
greater amounts of other beneficial microorganisms like Bacillus, Streptomyces and Sphingomonase0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial community was characterized by a higher abundance of the phyla Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes phyla and of the genus Pseudomonas, which are related to nutrient cycling, and by greater amounts of other beneficial microorganisms like Bacillus, Streptomyces and Sphingomonas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon/cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly increased total nitrogen, available phosphorus and total organic carbon.

Treatment
intercropped systemse0
Outcome
total nitrogen, available phosphorus and total organic carbon levelse0
Direction
boostede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropped systems significantly boosted the total nitrogen, available phosphorus and total organic carbon levels in addition to the melon yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon/cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly increased melon yield.

Treatment
intercropped systemse0
Outcome
melon yielde0
Direction
boostede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropped systems significantly boosted the total nitrogen, available phosphorus and total organic carbon levels in addition to the melon yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon/cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping enhanced acid phosphatase and β-glucosidase activity relative to melon monocrop.

Outcome
acid phosphatase and β-glucosidase activitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
melon monocrope0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They also enhanced the acid phosphatase and β-glucosidase activity compared to the melon monocrop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon/cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–25 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest first-year intercropping supports food and income supply and benefits the soil community and environment.

Outcome
provides a stable supply of food and incomee0
Qualifier
beneficial for the soil microbial community and environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results from this study suggest that melon/cowpea intercropping, starting from the first year, not only provides a stable supply of food and income due to the diversified cropping systems, but is also beneficial for the soil microbial community and environment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon/cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–25 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.