Paper · 2022 · Geoderma

Long-term effects of biochar application on rhizobacteria community and winter wheat growth on the Loess Plateau in China

Wei Li; Yuting Hou; Mei Long; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The use of biochar as a soil amendment has obvious impacts on soil biota and crop productivity. However, the relationship between the rhizosphere bacterial community and crop growth under biochar application is unclear, especially long-term analysis under repeated application of biochar. Thus, we evaluated changes in soil environmental factors, rhizosphere bacterial community structure, and growth traits of winter wheat following the application of different amounts of biochar. Biochar was applied twice in October 2011 and October 2016. The medium or high amount of biochar (10 t ha–1 or 20 t ha−1) application increased the soil moisture, nutrient contents, and urease and catalase activities. The β-diversity of the rhizosphere bacterial community was significantly affected by biochar and its interaction with different growth stages. Biomarkers enriched under biochar addition belonged to phyla comprising Cyanobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Nitrospirae, and Chloroflexi. Biochar addition significantly (P < 0.05) improved crop biomass, carbon and nitrogen uptake, and increased the relative crop nitrogen and carbon uptake rates (RNU and RCU) in all growth stages, with the highest dose in a medium amount of biochar (10 t ha−1). Biomarkers enriched under biochar treatments had positive correlations with RNU and RCU, such as Chloroflexales, Thermobioceraceae, and Parviterribacter. Our study furthers the understanding of the association of rhizobacteria community and crop growth under long-term application of biochar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium or high biochar application increased soil moisture and nutrient contents.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
medium or high amount of biochar (10 t ha–1 or 20 t ha−1)e0
Outcome
soil moisture, nutrient contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The medium or high amount of biochar (10 t ha–1 or 20 t ha−1) application increased the soil moisture, nutrient contents, and urease and catalase activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat growth on the Loess Plateau in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium or high biochar application increased urease and catalase activities in soil.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
medium or high amount of biochar (10 t ha–1 or 20 t ha−1)e0
Outcome
urease and catalase activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The medium or high amount of biochar (10 t ha–1 or 20 t ha−1) application increased the soil moisture, nutrient contents, and urease and catalase activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat growth on the Loess Plateau in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly affected the β-diversity of the rhizosphere bacterial community, including its interaction with growth stage.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
biochare1
Interactor
rhizosphere bacterial communitye1symbiont
Outcome
β-diversity of the rhizosphere bacterial communitye1
Qualifier
interaction with different growth stagese1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The β-diversity of the rhizosphere bacterial community was significantly affected by biochar and its interaction with different growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat growth on the Loess Plateau in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomarkers enriched under biochar addition belonged to Cyanobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Nitrospirae and Chloroflexi.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Biomarkerse2
Direction
enrichede2
Qualifier
Cyanobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Nitrospirae, and Chloroflexie2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Biomarkers enriched under biochar addition belonged to phyla comprising Cyanobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Nitrospirae, and Chloroflexi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat growth on the Loess Plateau in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar addition significantly improved winter wheat biomass and carbon and nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Biochar additione3
Outcome
crop biomass, carbon and nitrogen uptakee3
Direction
improvede3
Qualifier
P < 0.05e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Biochar addition significantly (P < 0.05) improved crop biomass, carbon and nitrogen uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat growth on the Loess Plateau in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar addition increased the relative crop nitrogen and carbon uptake rates in all growth stages.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Biochar additione3
Outcome
relative crop nitrogen and carbon uptake rates (RNU and RCU)e4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
in all growth stagese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“increased the relative crop nitrogen and carbon uptake rates (RNU and RCU) in all growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1171 · show in text ↑
e3

“Biochar addition significantly (P < 0.05) improved crop biomass, carbon and nitrogen uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat growth on the Loess Plateau in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium biochar amount of 10 t/ha gave the highest crop response among the biochar doses.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
medium amount of biochar (10 t ha−1)e5
Outcome
highest dosee5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“with the highest dose in a medium amount of biochar (10 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat growth on the Loess Plateau in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomarkers enriched under biochar were positively correlated with relative nitrogen and carbon uptake rates.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Chloroflexales, Thermobioceraceae, and Parviterribactere6symbiont
Outcome
RNU and RCUe6
Direction
positivee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Biomarkers enriched under biochar treatments had positive correlations with RNU and RCU, such as Chloroflexales, Thermobioceraceae, and Parviterribacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat growth on the Loess Plateau in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–121 · show in text ↑

biochar · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

in vitro · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

in vitro · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

biochar · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 80 positive, 5 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.