Paper · 2022 · Austral Ecology

Ineffectiveness of ants in protecting two sympatric myrmecophilous plants against endophytic beetles

Isamara Mendes‐Silva; Drielly Queiroga; Eduardo Soares Calixto; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Extrafloral nectarized plants attract ants, which may protect them against herbivory and increase plant fruit set production. In some cases, however, ants are ineffective against herbivores. Such events occur, for instance, when herbivores present adaptations to avoid ant predation. Thus, the outputs of these interactions depend on factors such as ant identity, plant phenology and herbivore features. Here, we investigated the endophytic florivorous beetles' impact on the reproductive success of their host plants, two sympatric Banisteriopsis (Malpighiaceae) species, depending on the action of extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) visiting ants. We experimentally manipulated the presence of ants and herbivores on B. malifolia and B. laevifolia species during their reproductive period to test the effectiveness of ants‐EFNs mutualism on plant fruit set production. We performed treatments where three similar inflorescences were selected to be (I) control branch, with no manipulations, (II) beetle‐free branch, isolated with textile cover and (III) ant‐free branch, isolated at the base with atoxic wax. We hypothesized that endophytic herbivores have a negative impact on the plant reproductive success because they escape the action of ants (biotic defences). As a result, we observed (i) that florivorous Anthonomus beetles have a negative impact on Banisteriopsis reproductive success; (ii) ants fail in protecting plants against floral endophytic beetles; and (iii) most of the results were species‐specific. Our results indicate that these systems present very conditional outcomes that depend on the intrinsic factors of each plant species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthonomus beetles reduced Banisteriopsis reproductive success.

Taxon
BanisteriopsisBanisteriopsise0
Interactor
Anthonomus beetlese0herbivore
Outcome
reproductive successe0
Direction
negative impacte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Banisteriopsis
Banisteriopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)João Medeiros · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“florivorous Anthonomus beetles have a negative impact on Banisteriopsis reproductive success”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ants failed to protect the plants against endophytic floral beetles.

Taxon
BanisteriopsisBanisteriopsise1
Interactor
floral endophytic beetlese0herbivore
Second interactor
antsFormicidaee0other
Outcome
fail in protecting plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Banisteriopsis
Banisteriopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)João Medeiros · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ants fail in protecting plants against floral endophytic beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1469 · show in text ↑
e1

“two sympatric Banisteriopsis (Malpighiaceae) species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–580 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most interaction results varied by plant species.

Taxon
BanisteriopsisBanisteriopsise1
Outcome
species‐specifice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Banisteriopsis
Banisteriopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)João Medeiros · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most of the results were species‐specific”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1522 · show in text ↑
e1

“two sympatric Banisteriopsis (Malpighiaceae) species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–580 · show in text ↑