Paper · 2022 · Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research

Liquid Organic Fertilizer Test and Tuber Cutting on Shallots (Allium Ascalonicum L.) Growth and Yield

Saiful Bahri; Siswadi; Dwijo Agus Purnomo

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the effect of liquid organic fertilizer concentration and bulbs cutting on the growth and the yield of shallots (allium ascalonicum. L). This research was conducted on december 02, 2021 until february 13, 2022 located in a garden plant food and horticulture tohudan, Tanon Lor, Gedongan, Colomadu, Karanganyar, Central Java, with an altitude of 105 m above see level. This research is Complete Random Blok Design (CRBD) factorials. The result showed that cutting tubers (P1) 0,25 a part on the parameters of observation of leaves, number of leaves, the wet weight of biomass, dry weight of biomass, number of tubers planted, number of tubers plot, tuber weight planted showed an increase with increasing LOF, while tuber weight a plot showed a decrease with increasing LOF concentration. The cutting of tubers (P2) 0,33 a part on the parameters of observation of number of leaves, the wet weight of biomass, dry weight of biomass, number of tubers planted, tuber weight planted showed an increase with increasing LOF, while the long narrow leaves, number of tubers plot, tuber weight a plot showed a decrease with increasing LOF concentration. The cutting of tubers (P3) 0,5 a part on the parameters of observation number of tubers planted, number of tubers plot showed an increase with increasing LOF, while the long narrow leaves, of number of leaves, the wet weight of biomass, dry weight of biomass, tuber weight planted, tuber weight a plot showed a decrease with increasing LOF concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 0,25-part tuber cutting, increasing LOF increased leaf observations, leaf number, and wet and dry biomass.

Treatment
increasing LOFe0
Outcome
observation of leaves, number of leaves, the wet weight of biomass, dry weight of biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
cutting tubers (P1) 0,25 a parte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cutting tubers (P1) 0,25 a part on the parameters of observation of leaves, number of leaves, the wet weight of biomass, dry weight of biomass, number of tubers planted, number of tubers plot, tuber weight planted showed an increase with increasing LOF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 0,25-part tuber cutting, increasing LOF increased tuber number per plant, tuber number per plot, and tuber weight per plant.

Treatment
increasing LOFe0
Outcome
number of tubers planted, number of tubers plot, tuber weight plantede0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
cutting tubers (P1) 0,25 a parte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cutting tubers (P1) 0,25 a part on the parameters of observation of leaves, number of leaves, the wet weight of biomass, dry weight of biomass, number of tubers planted, number of tubers plot, tuber weight planted showed an increase with increasing LOF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 0,25-part tuber cutting, tuber weight per plot decreased as LOF increased.

Treatment
increasing LOF concentratione0
Outcome
tuber weight a plote0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while tuber weight a plot showed a decrease with increasing LOF concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 0,33-part tuber cutting, increasing LOF increased leaf number and wet and dry biomass.

Treatment
increasing LOFe0
Outcome
number of leaves, the wet weight of biomass, dry weight of biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
cutting of tubers (P2) 0,33 a parte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cutting of tubers (P2) 0,33 a part on the parameters of observation of number of leaves, the wet weight of biomass, dry weight of biomass, number of tubers planted, tuber weight planted showed an increase with increasing LOF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 0,33-part tuber cutting, increasing LOF increased tuber number and weight per plant.

Treatment
increasing LOFe0
Outcome
number of tubers planted, tuber weight plantede0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of tubers planted, tuber weight planted showed an increase with increasing LOF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 0,33-part tuber cutting, increasing LOF decreased narrow leaf length, tuber number per plot, and tuber weight per plot.

Treatment
increasing LOF concentratione0
Outcome
long narrow leaves, number of tubers plot, tuber weight a plote0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the long narrow leaves, number of tubers plot, tuber weight a plot showed a decrease with increasing LOF concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 0,5-part tuber cutting, increasing LOF increased tuber number per plant and per plot.

Treatment
increasing LOFe0
Outcome
number of tubers planted, number of tubers plote0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
cutting of tubers (P3) 0,5 a parte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cutting of tubers (P3) 0,5 a part on the parameters of observation number of tubers planted, number of tubers plot showed an increase with increasing LOF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 0,5-part tuber cutting, increasing LOF decreased narrow leaf length, leaf number, and wet and dry biomass.

Treatment
increasing LOF concentratione0
Outcome
long narrow leaves, of number of leaves, the wet weight of biomass, dry weight of biomasse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the long narrow leaves, of number of leaves, the wet weight of biomass, dry weight of biomass, tuber weight planted, tuber weight a plot showed a decrease with increasing LOF concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 0,5-part tuber cutting, increasing LOF decreased tuber weight per plant and per plot.

Treatment
increasing LOF concentratione0
Outcome
tuber weight planted, tuber weight a plote0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tuber weight planted, tuber weight a plot showed a decrease with increasing LOF concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑