Paper · 2022 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Technologies of oats cultivation on ordinary chernozem in the Krasnoyarsk region

V N Romanov; A G Lipshin; N S Kazulina; et al.

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Studies to determine the impact of increasing the flow of biogenic energy in the agroecosystem on the productivity of oats were carried out in 2017-2019 in a stationary field experiment of the laboratory of varietal agricultural technologies. An assessment was made of minimal tillage, using the BDM-6 Rubin disc harrow and direct seeding technology with an improved SZS-2.1 stubble seedier, in comparison with traditional technology based on mouldboard plowing (control). The object of study is the oat variety Tubinsky, which showed a yield of 4 t/ha during variety testing. The crop yield was formed in severe weather conditions, which limited the oat yield to 2.9–3.4 t/ha, which is 15–28% lower than the level during variety testing. The bioenergetic assessment allows us to note that the highest energy coefficient was obtained in the variant of minimal processing with the use of ammonium nitrate (4.8) and direct sowing without the use of mineral fertilizers (4.4). Nitrogen fertilizers, in the form of ammonium nitrate, applied before sowing in the amount of 1 c/ha, contributed to an increase in oat productivity by 7–9%. In general, resource-saving technologies for crop cultivation reduce production costs by 12.6%, and fuel and lubricant consumption is reduced by 42.6% compared to technology based on mouldboard processing. The inevitable growth of weeds in direct sowing areas is reduced by 80% by the use of herbicides. Differences in the yield level between the technology options are insignificant, (Smallest Difference Existing) SDE 05 was 0.4 t/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe weather limited oat yield to 2.9–3.4 t/ha.

Treatment
severe weather conditionse0
Outcome
oat yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
2.9–3.4 t/hae0
Comparator
level during variety testinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severe weather conditions, which limited the oat yield to 2.9–3.4 t/ha, which is 15–28% lower than the level during variety testing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate raised oat productivity by 7–9%.

Treatment
ammonium nitrate, applied before sowing in the amount of 1 c/hae0
Outcome
oat productivitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7–9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilizers, in the form of ammonium nitrate, applied before sowing in the amount of 1 c/ha, contributed to an increase in oat productivity by 7–9%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1140 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.