Paper · 2022 · Nativa

GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT, AND PHOTOSYNTHETIC PERFORMANCE OF TWO SOYBEAN LINEAGES IN RESPONSE TO DROUGHT

Vanessa Do Rosário Rosa; Allan de Marcos Lapaz; Adinan Alves da Silva; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Drought stress is a common environmental factor that constrains plants from expressing their ecophysiological potential, disrupting various physiological and biochemical processes. Hence, the objective of this work was to evaluate the growth, development and photosynthetic performance under drought in the vegetative phenological stage of soybean in two lineages with potential difference tolerance to this abiotic stress, lineages (‘Vx-08-10819’ and ‘Vx-08-11614’. For this purpose, biometric traits of development, relative water content in leaves, photosynthetic pigments, gas exchange, and chlorophyll a fluorescence were evaluated. The experimental design was a randomized block design with 4 replications and arranged in a 2 × 3 factorial scheme, comprising of two soybean lineages (Vx-08-10819 and Vx-08-11614) in combination with three water availability [100% (control), 60%, and 40% of field capacity]. Relative water content in leaves, total leaf area, and shoot dry weight of lineage Vx-08-10819 were not changed after exposure to drought. Besides that, photosynthetic capacity of lineage Vx-08-10819 was less affected than lineage Vx-08-11614 to drought, showing that this lineage is tolerant to this abiotic stress in at vegetative stage V4. Keywords: chlorophylls; gas exchange; Glycine max (L.) Merr; water relations. Crescimento, desenvolvimento e desempenho fotossintético de duas linhagens de soja em resposta à seca RESUMO: O estresse hídrico é um fator ambiental comum que impede as plantas de expressarem seu potencial ecofisiológico, interrompendo vários processos fisiológicos e bioquímicos. Portanto, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o crescimento, o desenvolvimento e o desempenho fotossintético sob seca na fase fenológica vegetativa da soja em duas linhagens com potencial diferença na tolerância a este estresse abiótico, as linhagens Vx-08-10819 e Vx-08-11614. Para tanto, foram avaliadas características biométricas de desenvolvimento, teor relativo de água nas folhas, pigmentos fotossintéticos, trocas gasosas e fluorescência da clorofila a. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos casualizados com 4 repetições e dispostos em esquema fatorial 2 × 3, composto por duas linhagens de soja (Vx-08-10819 e Vx-08-11614) em combinação com três disponibilidades hídricas [100% (controle), 60% e 40% da capacidade de campo]. O conteúdo relativo de água nas folhas, a área foliar total e o peso seco da parte aérea da linhagem Vx-08-10819 não foram alterados após a exposição à seca. Além disso, a capacidade fotossintética da linhagem Vx-08-10819 foi menos afetada do que a linhagem Vx-08-11614 à seca, mostrando que esta linhagem é tolerante à este estresse abiótico no estágio vegetativo V4. Palavras-chave: clorofilas; troca gasosa; Glycine max (L.) Merr; relações hídricas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought did not change relative leaf water content, total leaf area, or shoot dry weight in Vx-08-10819.

Taxon
SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
Material
Vx-08-10819e0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Relative water content in leaves, total leaf area, and shoot dry weighte0
Direction
not changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative water content in leaves, total leaf area, and shoot dry weight of lineage Vx-08-10819 were not changed after exposure to drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic capacity of Vx-08-10819 was less affected by drought than Vx-08-11614 at stage V4.

Taxon
SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
Material
Vx-08-10819e0
Organ / stage
vegetative stage V4e0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitye0
Direction
less affectede0
Comparator
Vx-08-11614e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of lineage Vx-08-10819 was less affected than lineage Vx-08-11614 to drought, showing that this lineage is tolerant to this abiotic stress in at vegetative stage V4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 20 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 8 positive, 85 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.