Paper · 2022 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of soil amelioration on high value vegetables grown under protected conditions

VEERENDRA KUMAR VERMA; B U CHOUDHURY; ANJANI KUMAR JHA

11
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

High-value vegetable production under open field in northeast India's hilly ecosystem often suffers from abiotic and biotic stresses (low temperature, soil acidity and moisture deficit during winter, and infestation of pests-diseases during humid summer). Protected cultivation with soil ameliorative measures may help in overcoming these limitations while sustaining year-round production. An experiment was conducted at the Horticulture Experimental Farm, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Meghalaya for three consecutive years (2016–18) to study the yield performance of 4 high-value vegetables (tomato, capsicum, king-chilli and cucumber) grown under naturally ventilated polyhouse in the strong acid soils (pH<4.80) of mid-altitude (960 m amsl) sub-tropical hilly ecosystem of northeast India. Crops were grown with three ameliorative measures (liming @2.5 q/ha, black polythene mulching, and both) and yields were compared with control (without liming and mulching). Liming increased soil pH by 0.39–0.5 units, available phosphorus by 3.8–4.6 kg/ha and bases (calcium and magnesium) by 1.0–1.2 meq/100 g soil. On black polythene mulching, temperature (air and soil) increased by 5.5–8.7°C and 3.9–5.8°C, respectively, during extremely cold periods (December–February). Soil moisture retention was 3.8–5.2% higher over control plots. Ameliorative measures (liming or mulching) increased tomato yields by 15.0–28.5%, capsicum by 21.1–59.9% and king-chilli by 5.76–24.5% while cucumber yield in mulched plot increased 2-fold over respective control plots. The yields of all the vegetables further increased on the combined application of lime and mulch together. Findings suggest ameliorative measures promises better productivity of vegetables under controlled environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming increased soil pH by 0.39–0.5 units.

Treatment
Liminge0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.39–0.5 unitse0
Comparator
control (without liming and mulching)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Liming increased soil pH by 0.39–0.5 units”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“4 high-value vegetables (tomato, capsicum, king-chilli and cucumber)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“yields were compared with control (without liming and mulching)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming increased available phosphorus by 3.8–4.6 kg/ha.

Treatment
Liminge1
Outcome
available phosphoruse0
Direction
increasede1
Value
3.8–4.6 kg/hae0
Comparator
control (without liming and mulching)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available phosphorus by 3.8–4.6 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“4 high-value vegetables (tomato, capsicum, king-chilli and cucumber)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“Liming increased soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1001 · show in text ↑
e2

“yields were compared with control (without liming and mulching)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming increased soil calcium and magnesium bases by 1.0–1.2 meq/100 g soil.

Treatment
Liminge1
Outcome
bases (calcium and magnesium)e0
Direction
increasede1
Value
1.0–1.2 meq/100 g soile0
Comparator
control (without liming and mulching)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bases (calcium and magnesium) by 1.0–1.2 meq/100 g soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“4 high-value vegetables (tomato, capsicum, king-chilli and cucumber)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“Liming increased soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1001 · show in text ↑
e2

“yields were compared with control (without liming and mulching)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene mulch increased air temperature by 5.5–8.7°C during December–February.

Treatment
black polythene mulchinge0
Outcome
temperature (aire0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.5–8.7°Ce0
Qualifier
December–Februarye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On black polythene mulching, temperature (air and soil) increased by 5.5–8.7°C and 3.9–5.8°C, respectively, during extremely cold periods (December–February)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“4 high-value vegetables (tomato, capsicum, king-chilli and cucumber)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene mulch increased soil temperature by 3.9–5.8°C during December–February.

Treatment
black polythene mulchinge0
Outcome
soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.9–5.8°Ce0
Qualifier
December–Februarye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On black polythene mulching, temperature (air and soil) increased by 5.5–8.7°C and 3.9–5.8°C, respectively, during extremely cold periods (December–February)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“4 high-value vegetables (tomato, capsicum, king-chilli and cucumber)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased soil moisture retention by 3.8–5.2% over controls.

Treatment
black polythene mulchinge1
Outcome
Soil moisture retentione0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.8–5.2%e0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil moisture retention was 3.8–5.2% higher over control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“4 high-value vegetables (tomato, capsicum, king-chilli and cucumber)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“On black polythene mulching, temperature (air and soil) increased by 5.5–8.7°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming or mulching raised tomato yield by 15.0–28.5%.

Treatment
liming or mulchinge0
Outcome
tomato yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.0–28.5%e0
Comparator
control plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ameliorative measures (liming or mulching) increased tomato yields by 15.0–28.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1423 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil moisture retention was 3.8–5.2% higher over control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming or mulching raised capsicum yield by 21.1–59.9%.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
liming or mulchinge1
Outcome
capsicume0
Direction
increasede1
Value
21.1–59.9%e0
Comparator
control plotse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“capsicum by 21.1–59.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1447 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ameliorative measures (liming or mulching) increased tomato yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1409 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil moisture retention was 3.8–5.2% higher over control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming or mulching raised king-chilli yield by 5.76–24.5%.

Taxon
king-chillie0
Treatment
liming or mulchinge1
Outcome
king-chillie0
Direction
increasede1
Value
5.76–24.5%e0
Comparator
control plotse2

Verbatim

e0

“king-chilli by 5.76–24.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1477 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ameliorative measures (liming or mulching) increased tomato yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1409 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil moisture retention was 3.8–5.2% higher over control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching doubled cucumber yield relative to control plots.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
mulched plote0
Outcome
cucumber yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2-folde0
Comparator
respective control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cucumber yield in mulched plot increased 2-fold over respective control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined lime and mulch increased yields of all four vegetables further.

Taxon
tomato, capsicum, king-chilli and cucumbere1
Treatment
combined application of lime and mulch togethere0
Outcome
yields of all the vegetablese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of all the vegetables further increased on the combined application of lime and mulch together”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1668 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, capsicum, king-chilli and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–645 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene) · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

lime · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

mulching · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

58 papers: 50 positive, 8 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

mulching · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 184 positive, 26 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

lime · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.