Paper · 2022 · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment

Enhancing Sorghum bicolor (L.) grain yield with the use of field edge rainwater harvesting and NPK fertiliser in a dry region of Zimbabwe

Andrew Tapiwa Kugedera; George Nyamadzawo; Ronald Mandumbu; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Farmers in marginalised areas across Africa are mainly resource poor and have limited capacity to procure enough inorganic fertilisers. This contributed immensely towards declining crop productivity causing food insecurity. Soil moisture stress is another key factor which has led to a decline in crop yields across semi‐arid areas. This experiment determines the effects of field edge rainwater harvesting and NPK fertiliser microdosing on sorghum grain yields and agronomic nutrient use efficiency of two sorghum varieties (Macia and SV1). Rainwater harvesting techniques was the main plot factor with three levels (tied contour, infiltration pits and standard contour), sorghum variety was used as subplot factor with two levels (Macia and SV1) and NPK fertiliser as sub‐sub plot factor with five levels (0, 25, 50, 100 and 150 kg ha −1 ) with all treatments replicated three times. A randomised complete block design arranged in split‐plot was used. Results Phosphorous was significantly increased from 3.32 to 3.52 mg kg −1 with no significant ( p > 0.05) increase in total nitrogen and soil organic carbon. Sorghum grain yields were statistically ( p < 0.05) influenced by main treatment factors. Tied contour had considerably higher grain yield (861 kg ha −1 ) than infiltration pits and standard contours. Highest grain yield of 909 kg ha −1 was observed from plots applied 150 kg ha −1 NPK fertiliser. Macia variety performed significantly ( p < 0.05) higher than SV1. Grain yields show significant ( p < 0.05) increase with increasing fertiliser levels. Interaction of tied contour + Macia+ 150 kg ha −1 NPK fertiliser had significant grain yields (1150 kg ha −1 ) compared to other treatments. Treatments applied NPK fertiliser show significant differences ( p < 0.05) than unfertilised plots. Agronomic nutrient use efficiencies were significantly higher ( p < 0.05) from all treatments applied 25 kg ha −1 NPK fertiliser. Sorghum variety Macia had better nutrient use efficiency than SV1 in 2017/18 and 2018/19 seasons except during 2019/20 where results show insignificant differences. Conclusion It can be concluded that farmers adopt the use of tied contour and Macia variety using 150 kg ha −1 to achieved higher yields. Combining rainwater harvesting method of tied contour and mineral fertiliser can increase sorghum grain yields in dry regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil phosphorus increased from 3.32 to 3.52 mg kg −1.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.)Sorghum bicolort0
Outcome
Phosphorouse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.32 to 3.52 mg kg −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorous was significantly increased from 3.32 to 3.52 mg kg −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen and soil organic carbon did not increase significantly.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.)Sorghum bicolort0
Outcome
total nitrogen and soil organic carbone0
Direction
no significant ( p > 0.05) increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant ( p > 0.05) increase in total nitrogen and soil organic carbon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tied contour produced 861 kg ha −1 grain yield, higher than infiltration pits and standard contours.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Tied contoure0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
861 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
infiltration pits and standard contourse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tied contour had considerably higher grain yield (861 kg ha −1 ) than infiltration pits and standard contours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield, 909 kg ha −1, occurred with 150 kg ha −1 NPK fertiliser.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
150 kg ha −1 NPK fertilisere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
909 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield of 909 kg ha −1 was observed from plots applied 150 kg ha −1 NPK fertiliser”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Macia performed significantly better than SV1.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.)Sorghum bicolort0
Material
Maciae0
Treatment
Macia varietye0
Outcome
performede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SV1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Macia variety performed significantly ( p < 0.05) higher than SV1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased significantly as fertiliser level increased.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
fertiliser levelse0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields show significant ( p < 0.05) increase with increasing fertiliser levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1582 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tied contour with Macia and 150 kg ha −1 NPK yielded 1150 kg ha −1, significantly more than other treatments.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.)Sorghum bicolort0
Material
Maciae0
Treatment
tied contour + Macia+ 150 kg ha −1 NPK fertilisere0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Value
1150 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of tied contour + Macia+ 150 kg ha −1 NPK fertiliser had significant grain yields (1150 kg ha −1 ) compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots given NPK differed significantly from unfertilised plots.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
NPK fertilisere0
Outcome
significant differencese0
Comparator
unfertilised plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments applied NPK fertiliser show significant differences ( p < 0.05) than unfertilised plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1725–1823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient use efficiency was significantly higher at 25 kg ha −1 NPK.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
25 kg ha −1 NPK fertilisere0
Outcome
Agronomic nutrient use efficienciese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agronomic nutrient use efficiencies were significantly higher ( p < 0.05) from all treatments applied 25 kg ha −1 NPK fertiliser”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–1953 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macia had better nutrient use efficiency than SV1 in 2017/18 and 2018/19.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.)Sorghum bicolort0
Material
Maciae0
Outcome
nutrient use efficiencye0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
2017/18 and 2018/19 seasonse0
Comparator
SV1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Macia had better nutrient use efficiency than SV1 in 2017/18 and 2018/19 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1971–2051 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Macia and SV1 showed no significant nutrient use efficiency difference in 2019/20.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.)Sorghum bicolort0
Material
Maciae1
Outcome
nutrient use efficiencye1
Direction
insignificant differencese0
Qualifier
2019/20e0
Comparator
SV1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except during 2019/20 where results show insignificant differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2052–2118 · show in text ↑
e1

“Macia had better nutrient use efficiency than SV1 in 2017/18 and 2018/19 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1971–2051 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend tied contour with Macia and 150 kg ha −1 fertiliser for higher yields.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor (L.)Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
tied contour and Macia variety using 150 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
farmers adopt the use of tied contour and Macia variety using 150 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers adopt the use of tied contour and Macia variety using 150 kg ha −1 to achieved higher yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2156–2256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

92 papers: 80 positive, 12 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.