Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Productivity, nutrient-use efficiency and economics of rainy-season grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) as influenced by fertility levels and cultivars

J.S. MISHRA; N.S. THAKUR; PUSHPENDRA SINGH; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted under All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project (AICSIP) at 6 lo- cations during rainy seasons of 2009 and 2010 in a split plot design having 3 fertility levels, viz., control (0:0:0 kg/ ha of N: P O :K O), recommended dose of nutrients-RDF (80:40:40 kg/ha of N: P O : K O) and 150% of RDF 2 5 2 2 5 2 (120:60:60 kg/ha of N: P O : K O) in main-plots, while 8 sorghum cultivars including 3 hybrids (CSH 14, CSH 16, 2 5 2 CSH 23) and 5 varieties (SPV 462, CSV 15, CSV 17, CSV 23, SPV 1616) constituted the sub-plot to find out their effects on productivity and nutrient-use efficiency in rainy-season grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Results revealed that increasing levels of fertility up to 150% RDF significantly increased the grain yield (3.28 t/ha), nutrient uptake, net returns (25.97 103 /ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.79) as compared to control. Hy- brids produced 20.6% higher grain yield over varieties. Among hybrids CSH 16 (3.07 t/ha) and among varieties SPV 462 (2.56 t/ha) produced the maximum grain yields. The nutrient-use efficiency (NUE) was higher in hybrids (6.66 kg grain/kg NPK) than the varieties (5.54 kg grain/kg NPK). Increasing fertility levels from 100% RDF to 150% RDF increased the NUE of all the test hybrids, but decreased the efficiency of varieties except CSV 17.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertility up to 150% RDF significantly increased grain yield (3.28 t/ha) compared with control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
levels of fertility up to 150% RDFe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Value
3.28 t/hae1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing levels of fertility up to 150% RDF significantly increased the grain yield (3.28 t/ha), nutrient uptake, net returns (25.97 103 /ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.79) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertility up to 150% RDF significantly increased nutrient uptake compared with control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
levels of fertility up to 150% RDFe1
Outcome
nutrient uptakee1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing levels of fertility up to 150% RDF significantly increased the grain yield (3.28 t/ha), nutrient uptake, net returns (25.97 103 /ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.79) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertility up to 150% RDF significantly increased net returns (25.97 103 /ha) compared with control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
levels of fertility up to 150% RDFe1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Value
25.97 103 /hae1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing levels of fertility up to 150% RDF significantly increased the grain yield (3.28 t/ha), nutrient uptake, net returns (25.97 103 /ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.79) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertility up to 150% RDF significantly increased benefit:cost ratio (1.79) compared with control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
levels of fertility up to 150% RDFe1
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Value
1.79e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing levels of fertility up to 150% RDF significantly increased the grain yield (3.28 t/ha), nutrient uptake, net returns (25.97 103 /ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.79) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–904 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid CSH 16 produced the maximum grain yield (3.07 t/ha).

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
CSH 16e3
Outcome
grain yieldse3
Direction
maximume3
Value
3.07 t/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among hybrids CSH 16 (3.07 t/ha) and among varieties SPV 462 (2.56 t/ha) produced the maximum grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1072 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety SPV 462 produced the maximum grain yield (2.56 t/ha) among varieties.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
SPV 462e3
Outcome
grain yieldse3
Direction
maximume3
Value
2.56 t/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among hybrids CSH 16 (3.07 t/ha) and among varieties SPV 462 (2.56 t/ha) produced the maximum grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1072 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient-use efficiency was higher in hybrids (6.66 kg grain/kg NPK) than in varieties.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
hybridse4
Outcome
nutrient-use efficiencye4
Direction
highere4
Value
6.66 kg grain/kg NPKe4
Comparator
varietiese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“The nutrient-use efficiency (NUE) was higher in hybrids (6.66 kg grain/kg NPK) than the varieties (5.54 kg grain/kg NPK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1194 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient-use efficiency of varieties was lower (5.54 kg grain/kg NPK) than that of hybrids.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
varietiese4
Outcome
nutrient-use efficiencye4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
5.54 kg grain/kg NPKe4
Comparator
hybridse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“The nutrient-use efficiency (NUE) was higher in hybrids (6.66 kg grain/kg NPK) than the varieties (5.54 kg grain/kg NPK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertility from 100% RDF to 150% RDF increased the nutrient-use efficiency of all test hybrids.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Increasing fertility levels from 100% RDF to 150% RDFe5
Outcome
NUE of all the test hybridse5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
100% RDFe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–99 · show in text ↑
e5

“Increasing fertility levels from 100% RDF to 150% RDF increased the NUE of all the test hybrids, but decreased the efficiency of varieties except CSV 17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertility from 100% RDF to 150% RDF decreased the efficiency of varieties, except CSV 17.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Increasing fertility levels from 100% RDF to 150% RDFe5
Outcome
efficiency of varietiese5
Direction
decreasede5
Qualifier
except CSV 17e5
Comparator
100% RDFe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–99 · show in text ↑
e5

“Increasing fertility levels from 100% RDF to 150% RDF increased the NUE of all the test hybrids, but decreased the efficiency of varieties except CSV 17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1348 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

92 papers: 80 positive, 12 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.