Paper · 2022 · Environment Conservation Journal

Yield and economic response of Rabi maize (Zea mays L.) to different mulching and nutrient management

Susmita Moi; Bappa Mandal; Mahadev Pramanick

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2019-20 with the objective of evaluating the effect of mulching and nutrient management practices on growth, yield and economics of maize (Zea mays L.) at Balindi Research Complex, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, West Bengal, India on clay loam soil. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with nine treatment (T) combinations such as T1- Live mulch (Trifolium alexandrium)+50% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) [120:60:40 kg /ha N, P2O5 and K2O], T2- Live Mulch+75% RDF, T3- Live Mulch+100% RDF, T4- Straw Mulch (rice straw)+ 50 % RDF, T5- Straw Mulch+75% RDF, T6- Straw Mulch+100% RDF, T7- No Mulch+50% RDF ,T8- No Mulch+75% RDF and T9- No Mulch+100 % RDF, replicated thrice. Experimental results revealed that different mulching and nutrient levels exerted significant influence on growth, yield, net return and benefit-cost ratio (B:C). Application of straw mulch+100% RDF (T6) resulted in the highest plant height (164.57 cm), grain yield (5.28 tonnes /ha), stover yield (7.65 tonnes/ha) and B: C (2.16), however, treatment T7 recorded the lowest grain and stover yield. So, the integrated application of straw mulch along with 100% RDF could be recommended for better yield and higher profit of Rabi maize. Integration of organic mulch might be useful for long-term soil health benefits for the nutrient exhaustive maize crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching and nutrient levels significantly influenced maize growth, yield, net return and benefit-cost ratio.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
different mulching and nutrient levelse0
Outcome
growth, yield, net return and benefit-cost ratioe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different mulching and nutrient levels exerted significant influence on growth, yield, net return and benefit-cost ratio (B:C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch plus 100% RDF produced the highest maize plant height, 164.57 cm.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
straw mulch+100% RDFe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
164.57 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of straw mulch+100% RDF (T6) resulted in the highest plant height (164.57 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch plus 100% RDF produced the highest grain yield, 5.28 tonnes /ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
straw mulch+100% RDFe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.28 tonnes /hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of straw mulch+100% RDF (T6) resulted in the highest plant height (164.57 cm), grain yield (5.28 tonnes /ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch plus 100% RDF produced the highest stover yield, 7.65 tonnes/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
straw mulch+100% RDFe0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.65 tonnes/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of straw mulch+100% RDF (T6) resulted in the highest plant height (164.57 cm), grain yield (5.28 tonnes /ha), stover yield (7.65 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch plus 100% RDF produced the highest benefit-cost ratio, 2.16.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
straw mulch+100% RDFe0
Outcome
B: Ce0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.16e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of straw mulch+100% RDF (T6) resulted in the highest plant height (164.57 cm), grain yield (5.28 tonnes /ha), stover yield (7.65 tonnes/ha) and B: C (2.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T7 treatment recorded the lowest grain and stover yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
grain and stover yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T7 recorded the lowest grain and stover yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend straw mulch with 100% RDF for better Rabi maize yield and profit.

Taxon
Rabi maizee0
Treatment
straw mulch along with 100% RDFe0
Outcome
better yield and higher profite0

Verbatim

e0

“integrated application of straw mulch along with 100% RDF could be recommended for better yield and higher profit of Rabi maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1293 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest organic mulch might provide long-term soil health benefits in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
organic mulche0
Outcome
long-term soil health benefitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integration of organic mulch might be useful for long-term soil health benefits for the nutrient exhaustive maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1413 · show in text ↑

organic · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 115 positive, 14 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.