Paper · 1986 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Modeling the Plant Uptake of Cadmium and Zinc from Soils Treated with Sewage Sludge

G. L. Mullins; L. E. Sommers; S. A. Barber

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract To evaluate models for predicting plant uptake of Zn and Cd, a growth chamber study was conducted with soils collected from research plots in Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin that had been treated 4 yr previously with 100 Mg ha −1 of an anaerobically digested sewage sludge from Chicago, IL. The single application of sludge supplied 19‐kg Cd and 340 kg Zn ha −1 . Sludge application increased the concentration of Cd and Zn in the shoots and roots of corn ( Zea mays L.) seedlings grown for 16 and 22 d in the four soils. The application of sludge had no effect on the growth and properties of the corn root systems. Soil characteristics and kinetic parameters for Zn and Cd uptake were combined with a nutrient uptake model to predict Cd and Zn uptake by corn seedlings. In the untreated and sludge‐treated soils predicted Cd uptake ( Y ) was related to observed uptake ( X ) in nmol pot −1 by: Y = 90.03 + 1.41 X ( r = 0.81). Overprediction of Cd uptake by 41% may have resulted from an incorrect value of the Michaelis‐Menten constant, K m , and/or neglecting Cd efflux from roots. Calculated Zn uptake in the untreated and sludge‐treated soils was related to observed uptake by: Y = 3.29 + 0.857 X ( r = 0.91) where units for Y and X are µmol Zn pot −1 . A sensitivity analysis was conducted with the model to determine how each soil and plant factor affected predicted Cd and Zn uptake. Plant factors that had the greatest effect on Cd and Zn uptake include the root growth constants, average root radius, and water influx rate. Kinetics of Cd and Zn uptake and half‐distance between roots had little effect on Cd and Zn uptake. Concentration of Cd and Zn in the soil solution ( C i ) was the soil parameter showing the greatest effect on predicted metal uptake. In comparison, average buffer power and diffusion coefficients for Zn and Cd had minimal impact on predicted metal uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge increased cadmium concentration in corn seedling shoots and roots.

Organ / stage
shoots and rootse0
Treatment
Sludge applicatione0
Outcome
concentration of Cde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sludge application increased the concentration of Cd and Zn in the shoots and roots of corn ( Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge increased zinc concentration in corn seedling shoots and roots.

Organ / stage
shoots and rootse0
Treatment
Sludge applicatione0
Outcome
concentration of Cd and Zne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sludge application increased the concentration of Cd and Zn in the shoots and roots of corn ( Zea mays L.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge had no effect on corn root-system growth and properties.

Treatment
application of sludgee0
Outcome
growth and properties of the corn root systemse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of sludge had no effect on the growth and properties of the corn root systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–632 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model predicted cadmium uptake with correlation 0.81 and overpredicted uptake by 41%.

Outcome
Cd uptakee0
Value
41%e0
Comparator
observed uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“predicted Cd uptake ( Y ) was related to observed uptake ( X ) in nmol pot −1 by: Y = 90.03 + 1.41 X ( r = 0.81). Overprediction of Cd uptake by 41%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–786 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model predicted zinc uptake with correlation 0.91.

Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Value
r = 0.91e0
Comparator
observed uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calculated Zn uptake in the untreated and sludge‐treated soils was related to observed uptake by: Y = 3.29 + 0.857 X ( r = 0.91)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–786 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth constants, average root radius, and water influx rate had the greatest modeled effects on metal uptake.

Organ / stage
rootse2
Outcome
Cd and Zn uptakee0
Direction
greatest effecte0
Qualifier
root growth constants, average root radius, and water influx ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant factors that had the greatest effect on Cd and Zn uptake include the root growth constants, average root radius, and water influx rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1549 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–786 · show in text ↑
e2

“the corn root systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–631 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake kinetics and half-distance between roots had little modeled effect on metal uptake.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
Cd and Zn uptakee0
Direction
little effecte0
Qualifier
half‐distance between rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kinetics of Cd and Zn uptake and half‐distance between roots had little effect on Cd and Zn uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1649 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–786 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-solution cadmium and zinc concentration had the greatest modeled effect on predicted uptake.

Compound
Cd and Zne0
Outcome
predicted metal uptakee0
Direction
greatest effecte0
Setting
soil solutione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentration of Cd and Zn in the soil solution ( C i ) was the soil parameter showing the greatest effect on predicted metal uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1783 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–786 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Average buffer power and metal diffusion coefficients had minimal modeled impact on predicted uptake.

Compound
Zn and Cde0
Outcome
predicted metal uptakee0
Direction
minimal impacte0
Qualifier
average buffer power and diffusion coefficientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average buffer power and diffusion coefficients for Zn and Cd had minimal impact on predicted metal uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–1906 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–786 · show in text ↑

organic · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

organic · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 115 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.