Paper · 2022 · Caraka Tani Journal of Sustainable Agriculture

Study on Weeds Abundance on Rice Fields in Mycorrhizal Inoculation and Different Planting Methods

Charisnalia Listyowati; Didik Indradewa; Siti Nurul Rofiqo Irwan

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The increasing demand for rice and the increasing population growth rate require sustainable rice production. Direct seeding of rice (DSR) combined with the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is needed to achieve sustainable food production. This study aims to determine the effect of the planting method and mycorrhizal inoculation on the diversity, composition and dominance of weeds in a rice field for the sustainability of agricultural production. The research used a split-plot design with three replications. The main plot was the planting method consisting of on row, drum seeder and transplanting, while the subplot was mycorrhizal inoculation divided into with mycorrhizal inoculation and without mycorrhizal inoculation. The observed variables were light penetration, weeds population, weeds composition, weeds biomass, summed dominance ratio and community coefficient. The results showed that there were 34 kinds of weeds consisting of 13 families and the dominant weed was annual weeds, most of which were broadleaf weeds. The dominant weed was Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R. Br. ex DC. (sessile joyweed). The planting methods affected the weed population in 24 days after sowing (DAS) and the composition of broadleaf weeds in 24 DAS but did not affect weed biomass. The AMF inoculation did not affect weed population, composition, or biomass. It is necessary to find mycorrhizal species that can affect weed growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting methods affected the weed population in rice at 24 days after sowing.

Treatment
planting methodse1
Outcome
weed populatione1
Qualifier
in 24 days after sowing (DAS)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct seeding of rice (DSR) combined with the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is needed to achieve sustainable food production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–247 · show in text ↑
e1

“The planting methods affected the weed population in 24 days after sowing (DAS) and the composition of broadleaf weeds in 24 DAS but did not affect weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1286 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting methods affected the composition of broadleaf weeds in rice at 24 DAS.

Treatment
planting methodse1
Outcome
composition of broadleaf weedse1
Qualifier
in 24 DASe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct seeding of rice (DSR) combined with the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is needed to achieve sustainable food production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–247 · show in text ↑
e1

“The planting methods affected the weed population in 24 days after sowing (DAS) and the composition of broadleaf weeds in 24 DAS but did not affect weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1286 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting methods did not affect weed biomass in rice.

Treatment
planting methodse1
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
did not affecte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct seeding of rice (DSR) combined with the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is needed to achieve sustainable food production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–247 · show in text ↑
e1

“The planting methods affected the weed population in 24 days after sowing (DAS) and the composition of broadleaf weeds in 24 DAS but did not affect weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation did not affect weed population, composition or biomass in rice fields.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione3
Interactor
weede3weed
Second interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
weed population, composition, or biomasse3
Direction
did not affecte3
Comparator
without mycorrhizal inoculatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct seeding of rice (DSR) combined with the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is needed to achieve sustainable food production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–247 · show in text ↑
e2

“divided into with mycorrhizal inoculation and without mycorrhizal inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–737 · show in text ↑
e3

“The AMF inoculation did not affect weed population, composition, or biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice field had 34 kinds of weeds in 13 families.

Outcome
kinds of weedse4
Value
34 kindse4
Qualifier
consisting of 13 familiese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct seeding of rice (DSR) combined with the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is needed to achieve sustainable food production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–247 · show in text ↑
e4

“there were 34 kinds of weeds consisting of 13 families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–966 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dominant weeds in the rice field were annual weeds, most of them broadleaf.

Outcome
dominant weede5
Qualifier
annual weeds, most of which were broadleaf weedse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct seeding of rice (DSR) combined with the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is needed to achieve sustainable food production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–247 · show in text ↑
e5

“the dominant weed was annual weeds, most of which were broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1041 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternanthera sessilis was the dominant weed in the rice field.

Interactor
Alternanthera sessilisAlternanthera sessilise6weed
Outcome
dominant weede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternanthera sessilis
Alternanthera sessilis · InteractorJeevan Jose, Kerala, India · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct seeding of rice (DSR) combined with the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is needed to achieve sustainable food production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–247 · show in text ↑
e6

“The dominant weed was Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R. Br. ex DC. (sessile joyweed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1124 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal species that can affect weed growth need to be found for rice fields.

Outcome
weed growthe7
Qualifier
mycorrhizal species that can affecte7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct seeding of rice (DSR) combined with the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is needed to achieve sustainable food production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–247 · show in text ↑
e7

“It is necessary to find mycorrhizal species that can affect weed growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1436 · show in text ↑

inoculation · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.