Paper · 2021 · Current Science International

Response of Sugar Beet Yield and Quality to Fertilization with Different Nitrogen Levels Combined With Compost

A Abo; A Biomy; A; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at Mallawi Agriculture Research Station Farm, Minia governorate, Egypt, within two successive winter seasons of 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 to deduce the effect of nitrogen mineral fertilizer combined with compost treatments on yield and quality of sugar beet. Compost was prepared by utilizing a mixture of farm residues (Corn stalks and soybean straw) inoculated with special bio-decomposer strains of bacteria and fungi under aerobic conditions. The mixture received 10% rock-phosphate and 20% bentonit. After maturity the compost was amended with nitrogen fixing bacteria, phosphate dissolving bacteria and potassium dissolving bacteria. Four doses of nitrogen mineral fertilizer (0, 50, 75 and 100 kg N Fed -1 ) as ammonium nitrate 33.5% N per Fed were used. Four levels of compost (0, 2, 4 and 6 Ton Fed -1 ) were used. Generally, mineral fertilization with 75 kg nitrogen combined with 4 Ton Fed -1 compost gave the best values for root length, root weight, root weight and yield. Data of top sugar beet plant (fresh, dry weight and yield) reveals that there are significant difference among fertilized with 0, 50,75 and 100 kg N Fed -1 in the presence of 0, 2, 4 and 6 Ton Fed -1 compost. The best values of fresh, dry weight and top yield were recorded in the treatment received 75 kg N Fed -1 in the presence of 4 Ton Fed -1 compost. Significant differences in sucrose extractable, carotenoids, chlorophylls a+b, potassium and -amino N (meq 100g -1 ) were observed according to fertilization treatment levels. These results suggest that sugar beet fertilization by 75% N RD (67.5 kg N) fed -1 of nitrogen combined with 4 Ton compost is highly recommended to obtain the highest yield of sugar beet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilization with 75 kg nitrogen combined with 4 Ton Fed -1 compost gave the best root length, root weight and yield of sugar beet.

Treatment
mineral fertilization with 75 kg nitrogen combined with 4 Ton Fed -1 composte1
Outcome
root length, root weight, root weight and yielde1
Direction
beste1
Setting
Mallawi Agriculture Research Station Farm, Minia governorate, Egypte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–294 · show in text ↑
e1

“mineral fertilization with 75 kg nitrogen combined with 4 Ton Fed -1 compost gave the best values for root length, root weight, root weight and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1021 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Mallawi Agriculture Research Station Farm, Minia governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization at 0, 50, 75 and 100 kg N Fed -1 with 0 to 6 Ton Fed -1 compost produced significant differences in top fresh weight, dry weight and yield of sugar beet.

Treatment
0, 50,75 and 100 kg N Fed -1e3
Outcome
fresh, dry weight and yielde3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Data of top sugar beet plant (fresh, dry weight and yield) reveals that there are significant difference among fertilized with 0, 50,75 and 100 kg N Fed -1 in the presence of 0, 2, 4 and 6 Ton Fed -1 compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75 kg N Fed -1 with 4 Ton Fed -1 compost treatment gave the best top fresh weight, dry weight and yield of sugar beet.

Treatment
75 kg N Fed -1 in the presence of 4 Ton Fed -1 composte4
Outcome
fresh, dry weight and top yielde4
Direction
beste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–294 · show in text ↑
e4

“The best values of fresh, dry weight and top yield were recorded in the treatment received 75 kg N Fed -1 in the presence of 4 Ton Fed -1 compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization treatment levels produced significant differences in sucrose extractable, carotenoids and chlorophylls a+b of sugar beet.

Treatment
fertilization treatment levelse5
Outcome
sucrose extractable, carotenoids, chlorophylls a+be5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–294 · show in text ↑
e5

“Significant differences in sucrose extractable, carotenoids, chlorophylls a+b, potassium and -amino N (meq 100g -1 ) were observed according to fertilization treatment levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization treatment levels produced significant differences in potassium and -amino N of sugar beet.

Treatment
fertilization treatment levelse5
Outcome
potassium and -amino Ne5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–294 · show in text ↑
e5

“Significant differences in sucrose extractable, carotenoids, chlorophylls a+b, potassium and -amino N (meq 100g -1 ) were observed according to fertilization treatment levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1553 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet fertilization with 75% N RD (67.5 kg N) fed -1 of nitrogen combined with 4 Ton compost is recommended to obtain the highest sugar beet yield.

Outcome
sugar beet fertilization by 75% N RD (67.5 kg N) fed -1 of nitrogen combined with 4 Ton composte6
Qualifier
to obtain the highest yielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“sugar beet fertilization by 75% N RD (67.5 kg N) fed -1 of nitrogen combined with 4 Ton compost is highly recommended to obtain the highest yield of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1741 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 237 positive, 30 negative or no effect

236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.