Paper · 2022 · Theoretical & applied problems of agro-industry

CHEMICAL PROTECTION OF WINTER WHEAT FROM WEEDS IN THE ZONE OF COMMON CHERNOZEM OF THE VOLGOGRAD REGION

FSC of Agroecology RAS; A. I. Belyaev; V. N. Pavlenko; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Obtaining high yields with appropriate quality indicators is extremely important for the agricultural potential of the Volgograd region and requires the provision of cultivation technology specific to winter wheat, in which chemical destruction of weeds played a decisive role. The losses of winter wheat yield from weeds, depending on the state of sowing and the type of contamination, ranged from 1 to 24% (0.06...0.69 t/ha). The main shortage of the crop is associated with the growth of wintering species in the sowing (bedstraw, tenacious, field bindweed, chamomile, shepherd's bag, white mar, schiritsa and surepka), which are the main targets of herbicide treatments in the region. According to our data, the winter wheat yield decreases by 0.013 t/ha (0.34%) for 1% of the projective coverage, from 1 copy/m2 – 0.008 t/ha (0.22%). To realize the increased effectiveness of herbicidal action, it is necessary to use other combined herbicides or newer ones containing more elements with a greater spectrum of action of weed destruction. As a result of the conducted studies related to the control of weeds of winter wheat crops, the effectiveness of the use of new combined herbicides based on 2...3 active substances was established, which, due to their synergism, provide an increase in the degree of control; the use of smaller doses per 1 ha due to herbicides that stop the development of weeds from the first days of application and completely destroy weeds through 4...6 weeks after application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds caused winter wheat yield losses of 1–24%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
losses of winter wheat yielde0
Value
1 to 24% (0.06...0.69 t/ha)e0
Qualifier
depending on the state of sowing and the type of contaminatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The losses of winter wheat yield from weeds, depending on the state of sowing and the type of contamination, ranged from 1 to 24% (0.06...0.69 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wintering weed species accounted for the main crop shortage.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
wintering speciese0weed
Outcome
main shortage of the crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main shortage of the crop is associated with the growth of wintering species in the sowing (bedstraw, tenacious, field bindweed, chamomile, shepherd's bag, white mar, schiritsa and surepka)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–621 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHEMICAL PROTECTION OF WINTER WHEAT FROM WEEDS IN THE ZONE OF COMMON CHERNOZEM OF THE VOLGOGRAD REGION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each 1% projected weed coverage was associated with a 0.013 t/ha decrease in wheat yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Interactor
weedst0weed
Outcome
winter wheat yielde0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
0.013 t/ha (0.34%)e0
Qualifier
1% of the projective coveragee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the winter wheat yield decreases by 0.013 t/ha (0.34%) for 1% of the projective coverage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHEMICAL PROTECTION OF WINTER WHEAT FROM WEEDS IN THE ZONE OF COMMON CHERNOZEM OF THE VOLGOGRAD REGION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other stated weed-density increment was associated with a 0.008 t/ha yield decrease.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
weedst0weed
Outcome
winter wheat yielde1
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
0.008 t/ha (0.22%)e0
Qualifier
1 copy/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“from 1 copy/m2 – 0.008 t/ha (0.22%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHEMICAL PROTECTION OF WINTER WHEAT FROM WEEDS IN THE ZONE OF COMMON CHERNOZEM OF THE VOLGOGRAD REGION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The losses of winter wheat yield from weeds, depending on the state of sowing and the type of contamination, ranged from 1 to 24% (0.06...0.69 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

New combined herbicides containing two to three active substances increased weed control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
new combined herbicides based on 2...3 active substancese0
Interactor
weedst0weed
Outcome
degree of controle0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effectiveness of the use of new combined herbicides based on 2...3 active substances was established, which, due to their synergism, provide an increase in the degree of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHEMICAL PROTECTION OF WINTER WHEAT FROM WEEDS IN THE ZONE OF COMMON CHERNOZEM OF THE VOLGOGRAD REGION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicides stopped weed development from the first days of application.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
herbicidese0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
development of weedse0
Direction
stope0
Qualifier
from the first days of applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicides that stop the development of weeds from the first days of application and completely destroy weeds through 4...6 weeks after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHEMICAL PROTECTION OF WINTER WHEAT FROM WEEDS IN THE ZONE OF COMMON CHERNOZEM OF THE VOLGOGRAD REGION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicides completely destroyed weeds after four to six weeks.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
herbicidese0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
completely destroye0
Qualifier
through 4...6 weeks after applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicides that stop the development of weeds from the first days of application and completely destroy weeds through 4...6 weeks after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHEMICAL PROTECTION OF WINTER WHEAT FROM WEEDS IN THE ZONE OF COMMON CHERNOZEM OF THE VOLGOGRAD REGION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend broader combined or newer herbicides for greater weed destruction.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
use other combined herbicides or newer ones containing more elementse0
Qualifier
greater spectrum of action of weed destructione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is necessary to use other combined herbicides or newer ones containing more elements with a greater spectrum of action of weed destruction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHEMICAL PROTECTION OF WINTER WHEAT FROM WEEDS IN THE ZONE OF COMMON CHERNOZEM OF THE VOLGOGRAD REGION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑

herbicide · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.