Paper · 1984 · HortScience

Herbicide Systems for Nursery Plantings

M. S. Akers; P. L. Carpenter; S. C. Weller

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Field studies conducted for 2 years showed that glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine] or mixtures of glyphosate and preemergence herbicides applied as preplant and directed postplant sprays were effective in providing season-long weed control in commercial nurseries. Oryzalin [3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide] at 2.2 or 4.5 kg ai/ha, and mixtures of simazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine] at 1.1 kg ai/ha with diphenamid [ N , N dimethyl-2,-2-diphenylacetamide] at 6.7 kg ai/ha, napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxyl)- N , N -diethylpropionamide] at 2.2 kg ai/ha, alachlor [2-chloro-2’,6’-diethyl- N -(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] at 2.2 kg ai/ha or oryzalin at 4.5 kg ai/ha were effective treatments when used after preplant application of glyphosate (2.2 kg ai/ha) or when combined with glyphosate (2.2 kg ai/ha). None of the herbicide treatments reduced growth of red maple ( Acer rubrum L.), Norway maple ( A. platanoides L.), or creeping juniper ( Juniperus horizontalis Moench). Japanese spurge ( Packysandra terminalis Sieb. and Zucc.) survival was reduced by treatments containing oryzalin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate alone or with preemergence herbicides provided season-long weed control in commercial nurseries.

Taxon
Nursery Plantingst0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
season-long weed controle0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine] or mixtures of glyphosate and preemergence herbicides applied as preplant and directed postplant sprays were effective in providing season-long weed control in commercial nurseries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nursery Plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oryzalin at either tested rate was effective following or combined with preplant glyphosate.

Taxon
Nursery Plantingst0
Treatment
Oryzaline0
Outcome
effective treatmentse0
Direction
effectivee0
Qualifier
2.2 or 4.5 kg ai/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Oryzalin [3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide] at 2.2 or 4.5 kg ai/ha, and mixtures of simazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine] at 1.1 kg ai/ha with diphenamid [ N , N dimethyl-2,-2-diphenylacetamide] at 6.7 kg ai/ha, napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxyl)- N , N -diethylpropionamide] at 2.2 kg ai/ha, alachlor [2-chloro-2’,6’-diethyl- N -(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] at 2.2 kg ai/ha or oryzalin at 4.5 kg ai/ha were effective treatments when used after preplant application of glyphosate (2.2 kg ai/ha) or when combined with glyphosate (2.2 kg ai/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nursery Plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simazine with diphenamid was an effective treatment after or with glyphosate.

Taxon
Nursery Plantingst0
Treatment
simazinee0
Outcome
effective treatmentse0
Direction
effectivee0
Qualifier
diphenamide0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“mixtures of simazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine] at 1.1 kg ai/ha with diphenamid [ N , N dimethyl-2,-2-diphenylacetamide] at 6.7 kg ai/ha, napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxyl)- N , N -diethylpropionamide] at 2.2 kg ai/ha, alachlor [2-chloro-2’,6’-diethyl- N -(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] at 2.2 kg ai/ha or oryzalin at 4.5 kg ai/ha were effective treatments when used after preplant application of glyphosate (2.2 kg ai/ha) or when combined with glyphosate (2.2 kg ai/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nursery Plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simazine with napropamide was an effective treatment after or with glyphosate.

Taxon
Nursery Plantingst0
Treatment
simazinee0
Outcome
effective treatmentse0
Direction
effectivee0
Qualifier
napropamidee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“mixtures of simazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine] at 1.1 kg ai/ha with diphenamid [ N , N dimethyl-2,-2-diphenylacetamide] at 6.7 kg ai/ha, napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxyl)- N , N -diethylpropionamide] at 2.2 kg ai/ha, alachlor [2-chloro-2’,6’-diethyl- N -(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] at 2.2 kg ai/ha or oryzalin at 4.5 kg ai/ha were effective treatments when used after preplant application of glyphosate (2.2 kg ai/ha) or when combined with glyphosate (2.2 kg ai/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nursery Plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simazine with alachlor was an effective treatment after or with glyphosate.

Taxon
Nursery Plantingst0
Treatment
simazinee0
Outcome
effective treatmentse0
Direction
effectivee0
Qualifier
alachlore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“mixtures of simazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine] at 1.1 kg ai/ha with diphenamid [ N , N dimethyl-2,-2-diphenylacetamide] at 6.7 kg ai/ha, napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxyl)- N , N -diethylpropionamide] at 2.2 kg ai/ha, alachlor [2-chloro-2’,6’-diethyl- N -(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] at 2.2 kg ai/ha or oryzalin at 4.5 kg ai/ha were effective treatments when used after preplant application of glyphosate (2.2 kg ai/ha) or when combined with glyphosate (2.2 kg ai/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nursery Plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simazine with oryzalin was an effective treatment after or with glyphosate.

Taxon
Nursery Plantingst0
Treatment
simazinee0
Outcome
effective treatmentse0
Direction
effectivee0
Qualifier
oryzaline0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“mixtures of simazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine] at 1.1 kg ai/ha with diphenamid [ N , N dimethyl-2,-2-diphenylacetamide] at 6.7 kg ai/ha, napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxyl)- N , N -diethylpropionamide] at 2.2 kg ai/ha, alachlor [2-chloro-2’,6’-diethyl- N -(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] at 2.2 kg ai/ha or oryzalin at 4.5 kg ai/ha were effective treatments when used after preplant application of glyphosate (2.2 kg ai/ha) or when combined with glyphosate (2.2 kg ai/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nursery Plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments did not reduce red maple growth.

Taxon
red mapleAcer rubrume0
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
None of the herbicide treatments reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer rubrum
Acer rubrum · TaxonFtlombardo · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the herbicide treatments reduced growth of red maple ( Acer rubrum L.), Norway maple ( A. platanoides L.), or creeping juniper ( Juniperus horizontalis Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments did not reduce Norway maple growth.

Taxon
Norway mapleAcer platanoidese0
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
None of the herbicide treatments reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer platanoides
Acer platanoides · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the herbicide treatments reduced growth of red maple ( Acer rubrum L.), Norway maple ( A. platanoides L.), or creeping juniper ( Juniperus horizontalis Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments did not reduce creeping juniper growth.

Taxon
creeping junipere0
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
None of the herbicide treatments reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“None of the herbicide treatments reduced growth of red maple ( Acer rubrum L.), Norway maple ( A. platanoides L.), or creeping juniper ( Juniperus horizontalis Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments containing oryzalin reduced Japanese spurge survival.

Taxon
Japanese spurgee0
Treatment
treatments containing oryzaline0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Japanese spurge ( Packysandra terminalis Sieb. and Zucc.) survival was reduced by treatments containing oryzalin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1126 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Acer platanoides (Norway maple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · growth · Acer rubrum (red maple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.