Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Farm Sciences

Integrated crop management (ICM) practices to enhance watermelon yield and farm income

K Sundharaiya; N Sriram; R Baskaran; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field demonstrations on integrated crop management (ICM) practices on watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L) to increase the yield and farm income were conducted in Cuddalore district of Tamil Nadu by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Vridhachalam, Cuddlaore district, Tamil Nadu. In total, ten farmers were selected in three blocks viz Kattumannarkoil, Vridhachalam and Panruti of Cuddalore district. Critical inputs viz Azospirillum, phosphobacteria, Pseudomonos flurescense and ethrel were distributed to the farmers along with seeds of watermelon variety Arka Muthu. The biofertlizers and bio-inoculant were applied in the soil @ 25 g per plant. Foliar application of ethrel @ 200 ppm was done at 15 days after sowing and repeated three times at weekly interval. It was observed that ICM practices viz high yielding variety Arka Muthu, soil application of biofertilizers Azospirillum and phosphobacteria and bio-inoculant P flurescense each @ 25 g per plant and foliar application of ethrel @ 200 ppm registered higher values for number of fruits per plant (3.80), fruit weight (3.40 kg) and fruit yield (398.71 q/ha). The demonstration plots registered higher net income of Rs 1,99,104.28 compared to check which registered a net income of Rs 1,40,455.55 and higher B-C ratio of 2.55 as compared to 1.89 in local check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICM plots had higher fruit count per plant of 3.80.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
ICM practicese0
Outcome
number of fruits per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.80e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ICM practices viz high yielding variety Arka Muthu, soil application of biofertilizers Azospirillum and phosphobacteria and bio-inoculant P flurescense each @ 25 g per plant and foliar application of ethrel @ 200 ppm registered higher values for number of fruits per plant (3.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICM plots had higher fruit weight of 3.40 kg.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
ICM practicese0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.40 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ICM practices viz high yielding variety Arka Muthu, soil application of biofertilizers Azospirillum and phosphobacteria and bio-inoculant P flurescense each @ 25 g per plant and foliar application of ethrel @ 200 ppm registered higher values for number of fruits per plant (3.80), fruit weight (3.40 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICM plots had higher fruit yield of 398.71 q/ha.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
ICM practicese0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
398.71 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ICM practices viz high yielding variety Arka Muthu, soil application of biofertilizers Azospirillum and phosphobacteria and bio-inoculant P flurescense each @ 25 g per plant and foliar application of ethrel @ 200 ppm registered higher values for number of fruits per plant (3.80), fruit weight (3.40 kg) and fruit yield (398.71 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Demonstrations had higher net income, Rs 1,99,104.28 versus Rs 1,40,455.55 in checks.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs 1,99,104.28e0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The demonstration plots registered higher net income of Rs 1,99,104.28 compared to check which registered a net income of Rs 1,40,455.55”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Demonstration benefit cost ratio was higher at 2.55 versus 1.89 in checks.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
B-C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.55e0
Comparator
local checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher B-C ratio of 2.55 as compared to 1.89 in local check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑

ipm · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.