Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Effect of Application of Biostimulants on the Biomass, Nitrate, Pigments, and Antioxidants Content in Radish and Turnip Microgreens

Stefania Toscano; Daniela Romano; Cristina Patanè

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Microgreens are a functional food that is very appreciated for their good taste and product features. They are produced all year without fertilizers and pesticides. In this paper, the effects of the application of commercial and natural biostimulants on the yield and nutraceutical properties of turnip greens and radish microgreens were investigated. The experiment consisted of four treatments based on biostimulants (Bio-1: TRAINER®; Bio-2: AQUAMIN®; Bio-3: leaf moringa extract; C: distilled water (control)) applied in two species (turnip greens and radish). Fresh and dry biomass, nitrate content, pigments, antioxidants, and antioxidant activity were measured. All biostimulants promoted biomass (both fresh and dry) accumulation in the radish but not in turnip greens. The treatment with biostimulant did not affect plant growth in the radish, while a depressive effect of Bio-1 upon plant growth was observed in turnip greens (−19% smaller than control). In radish, Bio-3 led to microgreens with the highest chlorophyll a content (+75% with respect to the control). Bio treatments did not affect the Chl (a, b, total) content in turnip greens. Biostimulants significantly lowered the nitrate content compared to the control (−27% nitrates) and significantly promoted TPC (+19% over the control) in the radish. They also stimulated antioxidant activity (DPPH), with the highest value in Bio-1, in the turnip, and in Bio-2 and Bio-3, in the radish. Conclusively, biostimulant treatments showed a positive effect on microgreens and, in particular, on those of the radish, improving various nutraceutical parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All biostimulants increased fresh and dry radish biomass.

Treatment
All biostimulantse0
Outcome
biomass (both fresh and dry) accumulatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All biostimulants promoted biomass (both fresh and dry) accumulation in the radish but not in turnip greens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants did not promote turnip-green biomass.

Taxon
turnip greense0
Treatment
All biostimulantse0
Outcome
biomass (both fresh and dry) accumulatione0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All biostimulants promoted biomass (both fresh and dry) accumulation in the radish but not in turnip greens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant treatment did not affect radish growth.

Treatment
biostimulante0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment with biostimulant did not affect plant growth in the radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-1 reduced turnip-green growth by 19% versus control.

Taxon
turnip greense0
Treatment
Bio-1e0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
smallere0
Value
−19%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“a depressive effect of Bio-1 upon plant growth was observed in turnip greens (−19% smaller than control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-3 raised radish chlorophyll a content by 75% relative to control.

Treatment
Bio-3e0
Outcome
chlorophyll a contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
+75%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In radish, Bio-3 led to microgreens with the highest chlorophyll a content (+75% with respect to the control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants did not affect turnip-green chlorophyll content.

Taxon
turnip greense0
Treatment
Bio treatmentse0
Outcome
Chl (a, b, total) contente0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Bio treatments did not affect the Chl (a, b, total) content in turnip greens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants lowered radish nitrate content by 27% against control.

Treatment
Biostimulantse0
Outcome
nitrate contente0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
−27% nitratese0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Biostimulants significantly lowered the nitrate content compared to the control (−27% nitrates)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants increased radish TPC by 19% over control.

Outcome
TPCe0
Direction
promotede0
Value
+19%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly promoted TPC (+19% over the control) in the radish.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-1 produced the highest turnip antioxidant activity.

Treatment
Bio-1e0
Outcome
antioxidant activity (DPPH)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They also stimulated antioxidant activity (DPPH), with the highest value in Bio-1, in the turnip”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-2 and Bio-3 produced the highest radish antioxidant activity.

Treatment
Bio-2 and Bio-3e0
Outcome
antioxidant activity (DPPH)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antioxidant activity (DPPH), with the highest value in Bio-1, in the turnip, and in Bio-2 and Bio-3, in the radish.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1455 · show in text ↑

other · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.