Paper · 2022 · Plant Production Science

Localized phosphorus application via P-dipping is more effective for improving initial rice growth in lower temperature conditions

Aung Zaw Oo; Yasuhiro Tsujimoto

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

P-dipping is a practical approach for smallholder farmers to increase lowland rice yields with minimal fertilizer inputs by coating seedling roots with P-enriched slurry at transplanting. The effect of such localized application increases by concentrating more nutrients near the roots; however, this also increases the risk of salt stress known as fertilizer burning. The study aimed to identify the effect and burning risk of P-dipping on the initial rice growth under a range of temperatures. Rice seedlings were dipped instantly or for 2 h in slurry with different P2O5 concentrations at 0% (P0), 2.3% (P1), and 4.4% (P2), transplanted with the slurry attached to the seedling roots, and grown for 21–28 days at the day/night temperatures of 28°/20°C, 33°/25°C, and 36°/27°C. A significant interaction effect was detected between the P2O5 concentrations and growing temperatures on shoot biomass. With the P-dipping treatments, shoot biomass was increased 4.8–5.2 times at 28°/20°C. The effect of P-dipping became less significant with increasing temperatures because of the greater rates of withered leaves soon after transplanting. Burning damage was the greatest when the P2 treatment was combined with longer dipping duration at the 36°/27°C, nullifying the effect of P-dipping on shoot biomass. The results clearly showed that localized P application is more effective under lower temperatures, with lower risk of fertilizer burning. Elevated temperatures may disturb the effort to increase rice yields with minimal fertilizer inputs via localized application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The P2O5 concentration and growing temperature interacted significantly in their effect on rice shoot biomass.

Treatment
P2O5 concentrationse2
Outcome
shoot biomasse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rice seedlings were dipped instantly or for 2 h in slurry with different P2O5 concentrations at 0% (P0), 2.3% (P1), and 4.4% (P2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–625 · show in text ↑
e2

“A significant interaction effect was detected between the P2O5 concentrations and growing temperatures on shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-dipping increased rice shoot biomass 4.8–5.2 times at 28°/20°C.

Treatment
P-dippinge3
Outcome
shoot biomasse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
4.8–5.2 timese3
Qualifier
at 28°/20°Ce3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rice seedlings were dipped instantly or for 2 h in slurry with different P2O5 concentrations at 0% (P0), 2.3% (P1), and 4.4% (P2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–625 · show in text ↑
e3

“With the P-dipping treatments, shoot biomass was increased 4.8–5.2 times at 28°/20°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–985 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of P-dipping became less significant as temperature increased, because of greater rates of withered leaves soon after transplanting.

Treatment
P-dippinge4
Outcome
effect of P-dippinge4
Direction
less significante4
Qualifier
because of the greater rates of withered leaves soon after transplantinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rice seedlings were dipped instantly or for 2 h in slurry with different P2O5 concentrations at 0% (P0), 2.3% (P1), and 4.4% (P2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–625 · show in text ↑
e4

“The effect of P-dipping became less significant with increasing temperatures because of the greater rates of withered leaves soon after transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning damage was greatest with the P2 treatment combined with longer dipping duration at 36°/27°C.

Treatment
longer dipping duratione5
Outcome
Burning damagee5
Direction
greateste5
Qualifier
at the 36°/27°Ce5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rice seedlings were dipped instantly or for 2 h in slurry with different P2O5 concentrations at 0% (P0), 2.3% (P1), and 4.4% (P2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–625 · show in text ↑
e5

“Burning damage was the greatest when the P2 treatment was combined with longer dipping duration at the 36°/27°C, nullifying the effect of P-dipping on shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 36°/27°C with the P2 treatment and longer dipping, P-dipping nullified its effect on rice shoot biomass.

Treatment
P-dippinge5
Outcome
effect of P-dipping on shoot biomasse5
Direction
nullifyinge5
Qualifier
at the 36°/27°Ce5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rice seedlings were dipped instantly or for 2 h in slurry with different P2O5 concentrations at 0% (P0), 2.3% (P1), and 4.4% (P2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–625 · show in text ↑
e5

“Burning damage was the greatest when the P2 treatment was combined with longer dipping duration at the 36°/27°C, nullifying the effect of P-dipping on shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1302 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Localized P application was more effective under lower temperatures.

Treatment
localized P applicatione6
Outcome
more effectivee6
Direction
more effectivee6
Qualifier
under lower temperaturese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rice seedlings were dipped instantly or for 2 h in slurry with different P2O5 concentrations at 0% (P0), 2.3% (P1), and 4.4% (P2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–625 · show in text ↑
e6

“The results clearly showed that localized P application is more effective under lower temperatures, with lower risk of fertilizer burning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1441 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Localized P application carried a lower risk of fertilizer burning under lower temperatures.

Treatment
localized P applicatione6
Outcome
risk of fertilizer burninge6
Direction
lowere6
Qualifier
under lower temperaturese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rice seedlings were dipped instantly or for 2 h in slurry with different P2O5 concentrations at 0% (P0), 2.3% (P1), and 4.4% (P2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–625 · show in text ↑
e6

“The results clearly showed that localized P application is more effective under lower temperatures, with lower risk of fertilizer burning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1441 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperatures may disturb efforts to increase rice yields with minimal fertilizer inputs via localized application.

Treatment
Elevated temperaturese7
Outcome
increase rice yieldse7
Direction
disturbe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Elevated temperatures may disturb the effort to increase rice yields with minimal fertilizer inputs via localized application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1568 · show in text ↑

application · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 37 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.