Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Transcriptome and Physio-Biochemical Profiling Reveals Differential Responses of Rice Cultivars at Reproductive-Stage Drought Stress

Simardeep Kaur; Karishma Seem; Naveen Duhan; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
49
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought stress severely affects the growth and development of rice, especially at the reproductive stage, which results in disturbed metabolic processes, reduced seed-set/grain filling, deteriorated grain quality, declined productivity, and lower yield. Despite the recent advances in understanding the responses of rice to drought stress, there is a need to comprehensively integrate the morpho-physio-biochemical studies with the molecular responses/differential expression of genes and decipher the underlying pathways that regulate the adaptability of rice at various drought-sensitive growth stages. Our comparative analysis of immature panicle from a drought-tolerant (Nagina 22) and a drought-sensitive (IR 64) rice cultivar grown under control (well-watered) and water-deficit/drought stress (treatment, imposed at the reproductive stage) conditions unraveled some novel stress-responsive genes/pathways responsible for reproductive-stage drought stress tolerance. The results revealed a more important role of upregulated (6706) genes in the panicle of N 22 at reproductive-stage drought stress compared to that (5590) in IR 64. Functional enrichment and MapMan analyses revealed that majority of the DEGs were associated with the phytohormone, redox signalling/homeostasis, secondary metabolite, and transcription factor-mediated mitigation of the adverse effects of drought stress in N 22. The upregulated expression of the genes associated with starch/sucrose metabolism, secondary metabolites synthesis, transcription factors, glutathione, linoleic acid, and phenylalanine metabolism in N 22 was significantly more than that in the panicle of IR 64. Compared to IR 64, 2743 genes were upregulated in N 22 under control conditions, which further increased (4666) under drought stress in panicle of the tolerant cultivar. Interestingly, we observed 6706 genes to be upregulated in the panicle of N 22 over IR 64 under drought and 5814 genes get downregulated in the panicle of N 22 over IR 64 under the stress. In addition, RT-qPCR analysis confirmed differential expression patterns of the DEGs. These genes/pathways associated with the reproductive-stage drought tolerance might provide an important source of molecular markers for genetic manipulation of rice for enhanced drought tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 22 had 6706 upregulated panicle genes under reproductive drought versus 5590 in IR 64.

Material
N 22e0
Organ / stage
paniclee0
Outcome
upregulated (6706) genese0
Direction
more importante0
Value
6706e0
Comparator
IR 64e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed a more important role of upregulated (6706) genes in the panicle of N 22 at reproductive-stage drought stress compared to that (5590) in IR 64.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most DEGs were associated with several drought-mitigation pathways in N 22.

Material
N 22e0
Outcome
majority of the DEGse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Functional enrichment and MapMan analyses revealed that majority of the DEGs were associated with the phytohormone, redox signalling/homeostasis, secondary metabolite, and transcription factor-mediated mitigation of the adverse effects of drought stress in N 22.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N 22 had significantly more upregulated expression of metabolic and transcription factor genes than IR 64.

Material
N 22e0
Outcome
upregulated expression of the genese0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
IR 64e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The upregulated expression of the genes associated with starch/sucrose metabolism, secondary metabolites synthesis, transcription factors, glutathione, linoleic acid, and phenylalanine metabolism in N 22 was significantly more than that in the panicle of IR 64.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 22 had 2743 genes upregulated relative to IR 64 under control conditions.

Material
N 22e0
Outcome
genes were upregulatede0
Direction
upregulatede0
Value
2743e0
Comparator
IR 64e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to IR 64, 2743 genes were upregulated in N 22 under control conditions, which further increased (4666) under drought stress in panicle of the tolerant cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 22 had 4666 such genes under panicle drought stress.

Material
N 22e0
Outcome
genes were upregulatede0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4666e0
Comparator
IR 64e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to IR 64, 2743 genes were upregulated in N 22 under control conditions, which further increased (4666) under drought stress in panicle of the tolerant cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, 6706 panicle genes were upregulated in N 22 relative to IR 64.

Material
N 22e0
Outcome
genes to be upregulatede0
Direction
upregulatede0
Value
6706e0
Comparator
IR 64e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interestingly, we observed 6706 genes to be upregulated in the panicle of N 22 over IR 64 under drought and 5814 genes get downregulated in the panicle of N 22 over IR 64 under the stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–2021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, 5814 panicle genes were downregulated in N 22 relative to IR 64.

Material
N 22e0
Outcome
genes get downregulatede0
Direction
downregulatede0
Value
5814e0
Comparator
IR 64e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interestingly, we observed 6706 genes to be upregulated in the panicle of N 22 over IR 64 under drought and 5814 genes get downregulated in the panicle of N 22 over IR 64 under the stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–2021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RT-qPCR confirmed differential expression patterns of DEGs.

Outcome
differential expression patterns of the DEGse0
Value
DEGse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, RT-qPCR analysis confirmed differential expression patterns of the DEGs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 · show in text ↑