Paper · 2022 · Plant varieties studying and protection

The influence of moistening conditions and seed treatment with biological preparations on the growth and yield of winter wheat varieties

M. M. Korkhova; N. V. Markova; A. V. Panfilova

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Purpose. To determine the influence of the moistening conditions and treatment of seeds with biological preparations Azotofit-r, Fitotsyd, Mycofriend-r, Orhanik-balans Monofosfor on growth processes at the initial plant life stages, formation of stand density and grain yield of winter wheat varieties. Methods. General scientific, special, field, mathematical-statistical and calculation-comparative methods were used for research. Results. The key to a high yield of winter wheat is in obtaining even stands, forming the optimal density of plant stands at the time of harvesting, taking into account their survival rates, the coefficient of productive tillering, and the study of new varieties adapted to climate changes. According to the research results, it was determined that, on average, for 2020–2022, the highest grain yield among the studied varieties of winter wheat was recorded in plants of the variety ‘Duma Odeska’ (8.38 t/ha) under irrigation in the variant with pre-sowing treatment of seeds with the biopreparation Azotofit-r, which was 0.78 t/ha more compared to the control (treatment with water). In the variant without irrigation, the yield was 6.08 t/ha, which was less than the control by 2.3 t/ha or 27.4%. Conclusions. The developed elements of the technology of winter wheat varieties growing make it possible to form the optimal plant density and significantly increase grain yield in the conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Duma Odeska under irrigation with Azotofit-r seed treatment had the highest grain yield among winter wheat varieties, at 8.38 t/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Duma Odeskae2
Treatment
pre-sowing treatment of seeds with the biopreparation Azotofit-re2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
8.38 t/hae2
Qualifier
under irrigatione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“grain yield of winter wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“the highest grain yield among the studied varieties of winter wheat was recorded in plants of the variety ‘Duma Odeska’ (8.38 t/ha) under irrigation in the variant with pre-sowing treatment of seeds with the biopreparation Azotofit-r”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Duma Odeska with Azotofit-r seed treatment under irrigation yielded 0.78 t/ha more than the water-treated control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Duma Odeskae2
Treatment
pre-sowing treatment of seeds with the biopreparation Azotofit-re2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
moree3
Value
0.78 t/hae3
Qualifier
under irrigatione2
Comparator
control (treatment with water)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“grain yield of winter wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“the highest grain yield among the studied varieties of winter wheat was recorded in plants of the variety ‘Duma Odeska’ (8.38 t/ha) under irrigation in the variant with pre-sowing treatment of seeds with the biopreparation Azotofit-r”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1043 · show in text ↑
e3

“which was 0.78 t/ha more compared to the control (treatment with water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without irrigation, winter wheat yield was 6.08 t/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
yielde4
Value
6.08 t/hae4
Qualifier
In the variant without irrigatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“grain yield of winter wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–301 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the variant without irrigation, the yield was 6.08 t/ha, which was less than the control by 2.3 t/ha or 27.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without irrigation, winter wheat yield was less than the control by 2.3 t/ha or 27.4%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
without irrigatione4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
lesse4
Value
2.3 t/ha or 27.4%e4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“grain yield of winter wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–301 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the variant without irrigation, the yield was 6.08 t/ha, which was less than the control by 2.3 t/ha or 27.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1230 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)basis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The developed winter wheat growing technology allows optimal plant density and significantly increases grain yield in the Southern Steppe of Ukraine.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
significantly increasee5
Qualifier
optimal plant densitye5
Setting
Southern Steppe of Ukrainee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The developed elements of the technology of winter wheat varieties growing make it possible to form the optimal plant density and significantly increase grain yield in the conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1461 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.