Paper · 2023 · Insects

Impact of Post-Harvest Management Practices in Corn (Zea mays L.) Fields on Arthropods in Subsequent Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) Plantings

Alan W. Leslie; Scott R. McCluen; Cerruti R. R. Hooks

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

There is increased adoption of cover cropping and conservation tillage in the USA. Many farmers view these practices as methods for improving their soils. However, different cover cropping and tillage practices conducted post-harvest can have a disparate impact on arthropods within the subsequent cash crop. Field experiments were conducted during 2017 and 2018 at two experimental sites to examine the influences of different post-harvest practices following corn (Zea mays L.) harvest on pests and beneficials in subsequent soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] plantings. Experimental treatments included: (1) tillage via chisel plow (CP), (2) no-tillage in which corn residue/stubble remained on the soil surface (CS), and (3) planting a cover crop into corn residue (CC) following corn harvest. Overall, insect herbivore abundance was greater in the CP treatment. Foliar predator numbers were similar among treatments or of greater abundance in CP. The activity density of epigeal insect predators varied according to site and feeding guild. However, spider activity density was greatest in CP. Stink bug egg mortality due to predation and parasitism varied among treatments. However, the percentage of stink bug eggs that hatched was greatest in the CC during both years. Findings suggest that post-harvest practices investigated during this study will have a similar influence on most epigeal and foliar arthropods in soybean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect herbivore abundance was greater in the CP tillage treatment.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CPe0
Interactor
insect herbivoree0herbivore
Outcome
insect herbivore abundancee0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, insect herbivore abundance was greater in the CP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arthropods in Subsequent Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar predator numbers were similar among treatments or greater in the CP treatment.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CPe0
Interactor
foliar predatore0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Foliar predator numberse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
similar among treatmentse0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar predator numbers were similar among treatments or of greater abundance in CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arthropods in Subsequent Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The activity density of epigeal insect predators varied according to site and feeding guild.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
epigeal insect predatorse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
activity density of epigeal insect predatorse0
Qualifier
varied according to site and feeding guilde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity density of epigeal insect predators varied according to site and feeding guild”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arthropods in Subsequent Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spider activity density was greatest in the CP treatment.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CPe0
Interactor
spidere0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
spider activity densitye0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, spider activity density was greatest in CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arthropods in Subsequent Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stink bug egg mortality due to predation and parasitism varied among treatments.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
Stink buge0pest
Outcome
Stink bug egg mortalitye0
Qualifier
due to predation and parasitisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stink bug egg mortality due to predation and parasitism varied among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arthropods in Subsequent Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The percentage of stink bug eggs that hatched was greatest in the CC treatment during both years.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CCe0
Interactor
stink buge0pest
Outcome
percentage of stink bug eggs that hatchede0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
during both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the percentage of stink bug eggs that hatched was greatest in the CC during both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arthropods in Subsequent Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–133 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-harvest practices are expected to have a similar influence on most epigeal and foliar arthropods in soybean.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
post-harvest practicese0
Outcome
epigeal and foliar arthropodse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Findings suggest that post-harvest practices investigated during this study will have a similar influence on most epigeal and foliar arthropods in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arthropods in Subsequent Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–133 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.