Paper · 2003 · PubMed

Population Dynamics of Heterodera glycines in Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage Soybean/Corn Cropping Systems.

G R Noel; L M Wax

17
claims
17
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of no-tillage (NT), conventional tillage (CT), and crop rotation on soybean yield and population dynamics of Heterodera glycines were compared during a 7-year study in a silty clay loam soil with 6% organic matter. Either H. glycines-resistant 'Linford' soybean or susceptible 'Williams 82' soybean was rotated with corn and grown on 76-cm-wide rows in both tillage systems. Soybean was planted in 1994, 1996, 1998, 1999, and 2000. Yield of Linford was significantly greater than Williams 82 in all years. Soybean yield was affected by tillage in 1999 and 2000. No-tillage production tended to support more reproduction (R = number of eggs at harvest/number of eggs at planting) on both cultivars. The largest R for Williams 82 were in 1998: 58.35 for NT plots and 11.78 for CT plots. For Linford, the largest R were 12.09 for NT plots in 1996, and 3.71 for CT in 1999. When corn was planted, R decreased more in NT. When soybean was planted in years subsequent to 1994, numbers of eggs at harvest (Pf) were greater for Williams 82 NT than for Williams 82 CT or Linford in both tillage systems; however, crop rotation with corn negated these population increases. The soil became suppressive to H. glycines in 1999 and was suppressive in 2000. After the 3 years of continuous soybean, Pf per 250 cm[sup3] soil were 2,870 for Williams 82 NT, 791 for Williams 82 CT, 544 for Linford NT, and 990 for Linford CT in 2000, compared with Pf of 13,100 for Williams 82 NT, 15,000 for Williams CT, 2,360 for Linford NT, and 2,050 for Linford CT in 1994. Describing population dynamics solely on the basis of R was not adequate, but also required independent examination of initial populations following overwintering and Pf after the growing season. Planting soybean either NT or CT in rotation with corn did not result in long-term increases in numbers of H. glycines eggs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Linford soybean yielded significantly more than Williams 82 in all years.

Taxon
Linforde0
Material
Linforde0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Williams 82e0

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of Linford was significantly greater than Williams 82 in all years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–516 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage affected soybean yield in 1999 and 2000.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
tillagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
1999 and 2000e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean yield was affected by tillage in 1999 and 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–572 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage tended to support more nematode reproduction on both cultivars.

Treatment
No-tillagee0
Outcome
more reproductione0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
both cultivarse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“No-tillage production tended to support more reproduction (R = number of eggs at harvest/number of eggs at planting) on both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–708 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Williams 82 had a peak nematode reproduction ratio of 58.35 in no-tillage plots in 1998.

Taxon
Williams 82e0
Material
Williams 82e0
Treatment
NT plotse0
Outcome
largest Re0
Value
58.35e0
Qualifier
1998e0

Verbatim

e0

“The largest R for Williams 82 were in 1998: 58.35 for NT plots and 11.78 for CT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–795 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Williams 82 had a peak nematode reproduction ratio of 11.78 in conventional-tillage plots in 1998.

Taxon
Williams 82e0
Treatment
CT plotse0
Outcome
largest Re0
Value
11.78e0

Verbatim

e0

“The largest R for Williams 82 were in 1998: 58.35 for NT plots and 11.78 for CT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–795 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linford had a peak nematode reproduction ratio of 12.09 in no-tillage plots in 1996.

Taxon
Linforde0
Treatment
NT plotse0
Outcome
largest Re0
Value
12.09e0
Qualifier
1996e0

Verbatim

e0

“For Linford, the largest R were 12.09 for NT plots in 1996, and 3.71 for CT in 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–880 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linford had a peak nematode reproduction ratio of 3.71 under conventional tillage in 1999.

Taxon
Linforde0
Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
largest Re0
Value
3.71e0
Qualifier
1999e0

Verbatim

e0

“For Linford, the largest R were 12.09 for NT plots in 1996, and 3.71 for CT in 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–880 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode reproduction ratio decreased more under no-tillage when corn was planted.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
Re0
Direction
decreased moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When corn was planted, R decreased more in NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–927 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsequent soybean crops had more nematode eggs at harvest in Williams 82 no-tillage than Williams 82 conventional tillage or Linford.

Taxon
Williams 82e0
Material
Williams 82e0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
numbers of eggs at harvest (Pf)e0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Williams 82 CT or Linford in both tillage systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“numbers of eggs at harvest (Pf) were greater for Williams 82 NT than for Williams 82 CT or Linford in both tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation with corn negated increases in nematode egg numbers.

Treatment
crop rotation with corne0
Outcome
population increasese0
Direction
negatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop rotation with corn negated these population increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1174 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil became suppressive to H. glycines in 1999 and remained suppressive in 2000.

Taxon
H. glycinesHeterodera glycinese0
Outcome
soil became suppressivee0
Qualifier
1999e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Heterodera glycines
Heterodera glycines · TaxonAgricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil became suppressive to H. glycines in 1999 and was suppressive in 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1254 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Williams 82 no-tillage had 2,870 nematode eggs per 250 cm soil in 2000.

Taxon
Williams 82e0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
Pf per 250 cm[sup3] soile0
Value
2,870e0

Verbatim

e0

“Pf per 250 cm[sup3] soil were 2,870 for Williams 82 NT, 791 for Williams 82 CT, 544 for Linford NT, and 990 for Linford CT in 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Williams 82 conventional tillage had 791 nematode eggs per 250 cm soil in 2000.

Taxon
Williams 82e0
Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
Pf per 250 cm[sup3] soile0
Value
791e0

Verbatim

e0

“Pf per 250 cm[sup3] soil were 2,870 for Williams 82 NT, 791 for Williams 82 CT, 544 for Linford NT, and 990 for Linford CT in 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linford no-tillage had 544 nematode eggs per 250 cm soil in 2000.

Taxon
Linforde0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
Pf per 250 cm[sup3] soile0
Value
544e0

Verbatim

e0

“Pf per 250 cm[sup3] soil were 2,870 for Williams 82 NT, 791 for Williams 82 CT, 544 for Linford NT, and 990 for Linford CT in 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linford conventional tillage had 990 nematode eggs per 250 cm soil in 2000.

Taxon
Linforde0
Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
Pf per 250 cm[sup3] soile0
Value
990e0

Verbatim

e0

“Pf per 250 cm[sup3] soil were 2,870 for Williams 82 NT, 791 for Williams 82 CT, 544 for Linford NT, and 990 for Linford CT in 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1427 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study found reproduction ratio alone inadequate to characterize nematode population dynamics.

Outcome
population dynamicse0
Qualifier
independent examination of initial populations following overwintering and Pf after the growing seasone0
Comparator
Re0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Describing population dynamics solely on the basis of R was not adequate, but also required independent examination of initial populations following overwintering and Pf after the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean rotation with corn under either tillage system did not produce long-term nematode egg increases.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
rotation with corne0
Outcome
long-term increases in numbers of H. glycines eggse0
Direction
did not result ine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting soybean either NT or CT in rotation with corn did not result in long-term increases in numbers of H. glycines eggs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1875 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 31 positive, 22 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

rotation · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

rotation · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.