Paper · 2022 · Journal of Tropical Silviculture

Growth Analyses of Dipterocarpaceae Stand on Selective Cutting and Line Planting Silvicultural System with Different Planting Line Direction in North Kalimantan

M. Taufan Tirkaamiana; Lailan Syaufina; Jumani Jumani

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The potency of the Indonesian Tropical Forest, particularly in Kalimantan, has been shrinkage year by year. Selective Cutting and Line Planting System (SCLP) is expected to increase the productivity of the tropical forest. This study aims to analyze the growth and diameter increment of Dipterocarpaceae stand planted in West-East (W-E) and North-South (N-S) planting direction on SCLP at concession area of PT. Intracawood Manufacturing, Bulungan District, North Kalimantan, Indonesia. Growth and diameter increment data of Dipterocarpaceae was obtained by field measurement in 4 (four) permanent plots sized 100 m x 100 m with W-E and N-S directions. The study revealed that the largest growth and average diameter increment on a five-year-old stand is Shorea parvifolia with planting direction of W-E about 8,5 cm and 1,92 cm/yr. In contrast, the smallest is Dryobalanops lanceolata with N-S planting direction about 4,6 cm and 0,99 cm/yr. Planting line direction does not influence diameter increment. It is due to the stand position in the spacing line as an ex-cutting area or the right and left-hand sides of the planting line with low density and low average stand height (17,62 m). Therefore, the light intensity on the N-S planting line direction has no barrier of spacing line stand. Keywords: Increment, Light Intensity, Planting Line Direction

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shorea parvifolia had the largest average diameter increment (1,92 cm/yr) with W-E planting direction

Taxon
Shorea parvifoliaRubroshorea parvifoliae1
Treatment
planting direction of W-Ee1
Outcome
average diameter incremente1
Direction
largeste1
Value
1,92 cm/yre1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubroshorea parvifolia
Rubroshorea parvifolia · TaxonFarishhamka · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the largest growth and average diameter increment on a five-year-old stand is Shorea parvifolia with planting direction of W-E about 8,5 cm and 1,92 cm/yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–831 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dryobalanops lanceolata had the smallest growth and diameter increment with N-S planting direction

Taxon
Dryobalanops lanceolataDryobalanops lanceolatae2
Treatment
N-S planting directione2
Outcome
growth and diameter incremente0
Direction
smalleste2
Value
4,6 cm and 0,99 cm/yre2

Verbatim

e0

“growth and diameter increment of Dipterocarpaceae stand planted in West-East (W-E) and North-South (N-S) planting direction on SCLP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–385 · show in text ↑
e2

“the smallest is Dryobalanops lanceolata with N-S planting direction about 4,6 cm and 0,99 cm/yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–941 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting line direction does not influence diameter increment of Dipterocarpaceae stands

Taxon
DipterocarpaceaeDipterocarpaceaee0
Treatment
Planting line directione3
Outcome
diameter incremente3
Direction
does not influencee3

Verbatim

e0

“growth and diameter increment of Dipterocarpaceae stand planted in West-East (W-E) and North-South (N-S) planting direction on SCLP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–385 · show in text ↑
e3

“Planting line direction does not influence diameter increment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1004 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity on the N-S planting line direction is interpreted as not blocked by the spacing-line stand

Taxon
DipterocarpaceaeDipterocarpaceaee0
Treatment
N-S planting line directione4
Outcome
light intensitye4

Verbatim

e0

“growth and diameter increment of Dipterocarpaceae stand planted in West-East (W-E) and North-South (N-S) planting direction on SCLP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–385 · show in text ↑
e4

“Therefore, the light intensity on the N-S planting line direction has no barrier of spacing line stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1293 · show in text ↑