Paper · 2023 · Journal of Cotton Research

Growth, yield and fiber quality characteristics of Bt and non-Bt cotton cultivars in response to boron nutrition

Muhammad MEHRAN; Muhammad ASHRAF; Sher Muhammad SHAHZAD; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Boron (B) deficiency is an important factor for poor seed cotton yield and fiber quality. However, it is often missing in the plant nutrition program, particularly in developing countries. The current study investigated B's effect on growth, yield, and fiber quality of Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124) cotton cultivars. The experimental plan consisted of twelve treatments: Control (CK); B at 1 mg·kg −1 soil application (SB1); 2 mg·kg −1 B (SB2); 3 mg·kg −1 B (SB3); 0.2% B foliar spray (FB1); 0.4% B foliar spray (FB2); 1 mg·kg −1 B + 0.2% B foliar spray (SB1 + FB1); 1 mg·kg −1 B + 0.4% B foliar spray (SB1 + FB2); 2 mg·kg −1 B + 0.2% B foliar spray (SB2 + FB1); 2 mg·kg −1 B + 0.4% B foliar spray (SB2 + FB2); 3 mg·kg −1 B + 0.2% B foliar spray (SB3 + FB1); 3 mg·kg −1 B + 0.4% B foliar spray (SB3 + FB2). Each treatment has three replications, one pot having two plants per replication. Results B nutrition at all levels and methods of application significantly ( P ≤ 0.05 ) affected the growth, physiological, yield, and fiber quality characteristics of both cotton cultivars. However, SB2 either alone or in combination with foliar spray showed superiority over others, particularly in the non-Bt cultivar which responded better to B nutrition. Maximum improvement in monopodial branches (345%), sympodial branches (143%), chlorophyll-a (177%), chlorophyll-b (194%), photosynthesis (169%), and ginning out turn (579%) in the non-Bt cultivar was found with SB2 compared with CK. In Bt cultivar, although no consistent trend was found but integrated use of SB3 with foliar spray performed relatively better for improving cotton growth compared with other treatments. Fiber quality characteristics in both cultivars were improved markedly but variably with different B treatments. Conclusion B nutrition with SB2 either alone or in combination with foliar spray was found optimum for improving cotton's growth and yield characteristics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron nutrition at all levels and methods of application significantly affected growth, physiological, yield and fibre quality traits of both cotton cultivars.

Material
Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124)e1
Treatment
B nutrition at all levels and methods of applicatione3
Outcome
growth, physiological, yield, and fiber quality characteristicse3
Comparator
Control (CK)e2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The current study investigated B's effect on growth, yield, and fiber quality of Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124) cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–341 · show in text ↑
e2

“The experimental plan consisted of twelve treatments: Control (CK); B at 1 mg·kg −1 soil application (SB1); 2 mg·kg −1 B (SB2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–469 · show in text ↑
e3

“B nutrition at all levels and methods of application significantly ( P ≤ 0.05 ) affected the growth, physiological, yield, and fiber quality characteristics of both cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB2 alone or with foliar spray showed superiority over other treatments, particularly in the non-Bt cultivar.

Material
non-Bt cultivare4
Treatment
SB2 either alone or in combination with foliar spraye4
Outcome
superioritye4
Direction
superioritye4
Comparator
otherse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The current study investigated B's effect on growth, yield, and fiber quality of Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124) cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–341 · show in text ↑
e4

“However, SB2 either alone or in combination with foliar spray showed superiority over others, particularly in the non-Bt cultivar which responded better to B nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB2 gave a maximum 345% improvement in monopodial branches in the non-Bt cultivar compared with control.

Material
non-Bt cultivare5
Treatment
SB2e5
Outcome
monopodial branchese5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
345%e5
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The current study investigated B's effect on growth, yield, and fiber quality of Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124) cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–341 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum improvement in monopodial branches (345%), sympodial branches (143%), chlorophyll-a (177%), chlorophyll-b (194%), photosynthesis (169%), and ginning out turn (579%) in the non-Bt cultivar was found with SB2 compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB2 gave a maximum 143% improvement in sympodial branches in the non-Bt cultivar compared with control.

Material
non-Bt cultivare5
Treatment
SB2e5
Outcome
sympodial branchese5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
143%e5
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The current study investigated B's effect on growth, yield, and fiber quality of Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124) cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–341 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum improvement in monopodial branches (345%), sympodial branches (143%), chlorophyll-a (177%), chlorophyll-b (194%), photosynthesis (169%), and ginning out turn (579%) in the non-Bt cultivar was found with SB2 compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB2 gave a maximum 177% improvement in chlorophyll-a in the non-Bt cultivar compared with control.

Material
non-Bt cultivare5
Treatment
SB2e5
Outcome
chlorophyll-ae5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
177%e5
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The current study investigated B's effect on growth, yield, and fiber quality of Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124) cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–341 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum improvement in monopodial branches (345%), sympodial branches (143%), chlorophyll-a (177%), chlorophyll-b (194%), photosynthesis (169%), and ginning out turn (579%) in the non-Bt cultivar was found with SB2 compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB2 gave a maximum 194% improvement in chlorophyll-b in the non-Bt cultivar compared with control.

Material
non-Bt cultivare5
Treatment
SB2e5
Outcome
chlorophyll-be5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
194%e5
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The current study investigated B's effect on growth, yield, and fiber quality of Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124) cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–341 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum improvement in monopodial branches (345%), sympodial branches (143%), chlorophyll-a (177%), chlorophyll-b (194%), photosynthesis (169%), and ginning out turn (579%) in the non-Bt cultivar was found with SB2 compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB2 gave a maximum 169% improvement in photosynthesis in the non-Bt cultivar compared with control.

Material
non-Bt cultivare5
Treatment
SB2e5
Outcome
photosynthesise5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
169%e5
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The current study investigated B's effect on growth, yield, and fiber quality of Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124) cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–341 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum improvement in monopodial branches (345%), sympodial branches (143%), chlorophyll-a (177%), chlorophyll-b (194%), photosynthesis (169%), and ginning out turn (579%) in the non-Bt cultivar was found with SB2 compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB2 gave a maximum 579% improvement in ginning out turn in the non-Bt cultivar compared with control.

Material
non-Bt cultivare5
Treatment
SB2e5
Outcome
ginning out turne5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
579%e5
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The current study investigated B's effect on growth, yield, and fiber quality of Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124) cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–341 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum improvement in monopodial branches (345%), sympodial branches (143%), chlorophyll-a (177%), chlorophyll-b (194%), photosynthesis (169%), and ginning out turn (579%) in the non-Bt cultivar was found with SB2 compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the Bt cultivar, integrated SB3 with foliar spray performed relatively better for cotton growth than other treatments, with no consistent trend.

Material
Bt cultivare6
Treatment
integrated use of SB3 with foliar spraye6
Outcome
cotton growthe6
Direction
performed relatively bettere6
Qualifier
although no consistent trend was founde6
Comparator
other treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The current study investigated B's effect on growth, yield, and fiber quality of Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124) cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–341 · show in text ↑
e6

“In Bt cultivar, although no consistent trend was found but integrated use of SB3 with foliar spray performed relatively better for improving cotton growth compared with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron treatments markedly but variably improved fibre quality characteristics in both cotton cultivars.

Material
both cultivarse7
Treatment
different B treatmentse7
Outcome
Fiber quality characteristicse7
Direction
improved markedlye7
Qualifier
variablye7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The current study investigated B's effect on growth, yield, and fiber quality of Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124) cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–341 · show in text ↑
e7

“Fiber quality characteristics in both cultivars were improved markedly but variably with different B treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1695–1806 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

B nutrition with SB2, alone or with foliar spray, is recommended for improving cotton growth and yield characteristics.

Treatment
B nutrition with SB2e2
Outcome
growth and yield characteristicse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The current study investigated B's effect on growth, yield, and fiber quality of Bt (CIM-663) and non-Bt (Cyto-124) cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–341 · show in text ↑
e2

“B nutrition with SB2 either alone or in combination with foliar spray was found optimum for improving cotton's growth and yield characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1962 · show in text ↑

boron atom · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 96 positive, 19 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.