Paper · 2023 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Development a Unit for Onion Harvesting

Sh. El-Waseef; H. Abdel-Mageed,; Y. Ramadan

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was mainly conducted to fabricate and evaluate a harvester unit for onion crop. So the experimental design was implemented with four different of blade types, tilt angle of shares and speed ratio under three different harvesting depths. These variables were tested according to Total losses concerning(Blade damage - Brushing damage - Conveying losses - Un-lifted bulbs ratio); Efficiencies concerning(Digging efficiency - Cleaning efficiency - Harvesting efficiency - Field efficiency); Effective field capacity; Specific energy and Total costs. All trials were preceded in El-Serw Agic. Res. Station, Damietta Governorate during the onion harvest season 2020-2021. The overall results were summarized into the modification in the onion harvester with blades changed to scoop shapes with tilt angle of shares of 250 and speed ratio of 2.11 under harvesting depth of 11 cm to achieve the lowest total damage and high efficiencies and specific energy with less overall costs in general. While some parameters showed the best results in partial variables as gator blades and 5 cm digging depth for effective field capacity and field efficiency; speed ratio of 1.7 for effective field capacity, cleaning efficiency and specific energy and blade angle of 200 for field efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scoop shaped blades with a share tilt angle of 250, speed ratio 2.11 and 11 cm depth gave the lowest total damage.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
blades changed to scoop shapes with tilt angle of shares of 250 and speed ratio of 2.11 under harvesting depth of 11 cme0
Outcome
total damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
11 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“modification in the onion harvester with blades changed to scoop shapes with tilt angle of shares of 250 and speed ratio of 2.11 under harvesting depth of 11 cm to achieve the lowest total damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–28 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The scoop blade configuration gave high efficiencies and specific energy with lower overall costs.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
blades changed to scoop shapese0
Outcome
high efficiencies and specific energy with less overall costse0
Value
2.11e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blades changed to scoop shapes with tilt angle of shares of 250 and speed ratio of 2.11 under harvesting depth of 11 cm to achieve the lowest total damage and high efficiencies and specific energy with less overall costs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–28 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gator blades and 5 cm digging depth gave the best effective field capacity and field efficiency.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
gator blades and 5 cm digging depthe0
Outcome
effective field capacity and field efficiencye0
Value
5 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gator blades and 5 cm digging depth for effective field capacity and field efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–28 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A speed ratio of 1.7 gave the best effective field capacity, cleaning efficiency and specific energy.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
effective field capacity, cleaning efficiency and specific energye0
Value
1.7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“speed ratio of 1.7 for effective field capacity, cleaning efficiency and specific energy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–28 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A blade angle of 200 gave the best field efficiency.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
field efficiencye0
Value
200e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blade angle of 200 for field efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–28 · show in text ↑