Abstract
Field experiments were conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, during Winter irrigated seasons of 2017-18 and 2018-19 to study the effect of weed growth by growth retardants on machine-sown cotton under high-density planting system. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design, and the treatments were replicated thrice. Main plot treatments comprised of three crop geometries viz., 75 cm x 10 cm (M1), 75 cm x 20 cm (M2) and 75 cm x 30 cm (M3) and seven sub plots of foliar application of growth retardants along with one control viz., Cycocel 400 ppm (S1), Cycocel 500 ppm (S2), Mepiquat Chloride 100 ppm (S3), Mepiquat Chloride 200 ppm (S4), Maleic Hydrazide 400 ppm (S5), Maleic Hydrazide 500 ppm (S6) and Control (No Spray) (S7). Cotton genotype TCH 1819, developed for synchronized maturity exclusively to fit into high density planting system, was used as the test crop. The cotton crop was raised under raised bed and the major cultivation practices were carried out with machines namely; inclined plate planter for sowing, power weeder for weeding and drip system for irrigation and fertigation. However, harvesting was done manually. Weed infestation in cotton increased with 75 cm x 10 cm spacing compared to wider spacing. With respect to foliar application of growth retardants, there were no significant differences observed among the treatments tested during both the years of the study.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Weed infestation increased at 75 cm x 10 cm spacing versus wider spacing.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- 75 cm x 10 cm spacinge0
- Interactor
- Weede0weed
- Outcome
- Weed infestatione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- wider spacinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weed infestation in cotton increased with 75 cm x 10 cm spacing compared to wider spacing.”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar growth retardant treatments did not differ significantly in the reported weed response across both years.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of growth retardantse0
- Outcome
- differencese0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Comparator
- treatments testede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“With respect to foliar application of growth retardants, there were no significant differences observed among the treatments tested during both the years of the study.”
t0“Cotton”
The same questions in other papers
density · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.