Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Efficacy of fungicides on dry root rot of chickpea under field condition

OP Bharti; RC Jatav; MK Bankoliya; et al.

10
claims
50
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted on efficacy of fungicides of chickpea dry root rot incited by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler has been emerging as a potential threat in last decades for successful and profitable chickpea cultivation because the pathogen is soil borne nature. The present investigation conducted at chickpea dry root rot hot spot area under natural conditioning Harda district of Madhya Pradesh during rabi 2017-18. The data evident that the spraying of Trifloxystrobin 25% + Tebuconazole 50% @ 500g ha-1 proven most effective for reducing dry root rot incidence in chickpea followed by Propiconozole 25 EC@ 500g ha-1, Tebuconazole 250 EC (25.9% W/W) @625 ml ha-1, Metalaxyl 4%+ Mancozeb 64% @ 1000g ha-1, and Pyraclostrobin 20 WG @500g ha-1 compare to control, while, the incidence of dry root rot noticed minimum 1.50, 2.25, 3.75, 9.50 and 11.50 per cent respectively, although, the incidence 60.75 per cent chickpea dry root rot was noticed in control in respect to management of the diseases, while, Pyraclostrobin 20 WG was found least effective in minimizing the disease incidence. The grain yield maximum 23.25 q ha-1, while, least grain yield 8.75 q ha-1 was harvested in control. Apart from this, the Benefit Cost Ratio 1:2.76 and 1:1.18 was noticed in Trifloxystrobin25% + Tebuconazole 50% and control treatment, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying Trifloxystrobin 25% + Tebuconazole 50% was the most effective treatment for reducing dry root rot incidence in chickpea, with incidence of 1.50%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
the spraying of Trifloxystrobin 25% + Tebuconazole 50% @ 500g ha-1e1
Interactor
Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
dry root rot incidencee1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
1.50e2
Comparator
controle3
Setting
Harda district of Madhya Pradeshe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of fungicides on dry root rot of chickpea under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“efficacy of fungicides of chickpea dry root rot incited by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“the spraying of Trifloxystrobin 25% + Tebuconazole 50% @ 500g ha-1 proven most effective for reducing dry root rot incidence in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–592 · show in text ↑
e2

“the incidence of dry root rot noticed minimum 1.50, 2.25, 3.75, 9.50 and 11.50 per cent respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–887 · show in text ↑
e3

“the incidence 60.75 per cent chickpea dry root rot was noticed in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–972 · show in text ↑
e7

“The present investigation conducted at chickpea dry root rot hot spot area under natural conditioning Harda district of Madhya Pradesh during rabi 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole 25 EC gave dry root rot incidence of 2.25% in chickpea, with a minimum incidence relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Propiconozole 25 EC@ 500g ha-1e1
Interactor
Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of dry root rote2
Direction
minimume2
Value
2.25e2
Comparator
controle3
Setting
Harda district of Madhya Pradeshe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of fungicides on dry root rot of chickpea under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“efficacy of fungicides of chickpea dry root rot incited by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–127 · show in text ↑
e2

“the incidence of dry root rot noticed minimum 1.50, 2.25, 3.75, 9.50 and 11.50 per cent respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“Propiconozole 25 EC@ 500g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–635 · show in text ↑
e3

“the incidence 60.75 per cent chickpea dry root rot was noticed in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–972 · show in text ↑
e7

“The present investigation conducted at chickpea dry root rot hot spot area under natural conditioning Harda district of Madhya Pradesh during rabi 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole 250 EC gave dry root rot incidence of 3.75% in chickpea, with a minimum incidence relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Tebuconazole 250 EC (25.9% W/W) @625 ml ha-1e1
Interactor
Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of dry root rote2
Direction
minimume2
Value
3.75e2
Comparator
controle3
Setting
Harda district of Madhya Pradeshe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of fungicides on dry root rot of chickpea under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“efficacy of fungicides of chickpea dry root rot incited by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–127 · show in text ↑
e2

“the incidence of dry root rot noticed minimum 1.50, 2.25, 3.75, 9.50 and 11.50 per cent respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tebuconazole 250 EC (25.9% W/W) @625 ml ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–681 · show in text ↑
e3

“the incidence 60.75 per cent chickpea dry root rot was noticed in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–972 · show in text ↑
e7

“The present investigation conducted at chickpea dry root rot hot spot area under natural conditioning Harda district of Madhya Pradesh during rabi 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metalaxyl 4% + Mancozeb 64% gave dry root rot incidence of 9.50% in chickpea, with a minimum incidence relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Metalaxyl 4%+ Mancozeb 64% @ 1000g ha-1e1
Interactor
Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of dry root rote2
Direction
minimume2
Value
9.50e2
Comparator
controle3
Setting
Harda district of Madhya Pradeshe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of fungicides on dry root rot of chickpea under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“efficacy of fungicides of chickpea dry root rot incited by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–127 · show in text ↑
e2

“the incidence of dry root rot noticed minimum 1.50, 2.25, 3.75, 9.50 and 11.50 per cent respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“Metalaxyl 4%+ Mancozeb 64% @ 1000g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–722 · show in text ↑
e3

“the incidence 60.75 per cent chickpea dry root rot was noticed in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–972 · show in text ↑
e7

“The present investigation conducted at chickpea dry root rot hot spot area under natural conditioning Harda district of Madhya Pradesh during rabi 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyraclostrobin 20 WG was the least effective fungicide, with dry root rot incidence of 11.50% in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Pyraclostrobin 20 WGe4
Interactor
Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee4
Direction
least effectivee4
Value
11.50e2
Comparator
controle3
Setting
Harda district of Madhya Pradeshe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of fungicides on dry root rot of chickpea under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“efficacy of fungicides of chickpea dry root rot incited by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–127 · show in text ↑
e2

“the incidence of dry root rot noticed minimum 1.50, 2.25, 3.75, 9.50 and 11.50 per cent respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–887 · show in text ↑
e4

“Pyraclostrobin 20 WG was found least effective in minimizing the disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1104 · show in text ↑
e3

“the incidence 60.75 per cent chickpea dry root rot was noticed in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–972 · show in text ↑
e7

“The present investigation conducted at chickpea dry root rot hot spot area under natural conditioning Harda district of Madhya Pradesh during rabi 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry root rot incidence in untreated control chickpea was 60.75%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
dry root rote3
Value
60.75 per cente3
Qualifier
controle3
Setting
Harda district of Madhya Pradeshe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of fungicides on dry root rot of chickpea under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“efficacy of fungicides of chickpea dry root rot incited by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–127 · show in text ↑
e3

“the incidence 60.75 per cent chickpea dry root rot was noticed in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–972 · show in text ↑
e7

“The present investigation conducted at chickpea dry root rot hot spot area under natural conditioning Harda district of Madhya Pradesh during rabi 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum grain yield of chickpea was 23.25 q/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
grain yielde5
Value
23.25 q ha-1e5
Qualifier
maximume5
Setting
Harda district of Madhya Pradeshe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of fungicides on dry root rot of chickpea under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“efficacy of fungicides of chickpea dry root rot incited by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–127 · show in text ↑
e5

“The grain yield maximum 23.25 q ha-1, while, least grain yield 8.75 q ha-1 was harvested in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1205 · show in text ↑
e7

“The present investigation conducted at chickpea dry root rot hot spot area under natural conditioning Harda district of Madhya Pradesh during rabi 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Least grain yield of chickpea was 8.75 q/ha, harvested in control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
least grain yielde5
Value
8.75 q ha-1e5
Qualifier
harvested in controle5
Setting
Harda district of Madhya Pradeshe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of fungicides on dry root rot of chickpea under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“efficacy of fungicides of chickpea dry root rot incited by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–127 · show in text ↑
e5

“The grain yield maximum 23.25 q ha-1, while, least grain yield 8.75 q ha-1 was harvested in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1205 · show in text ↑
e7

“The present investigation conducted at chickpea dry root rot hot spot area under natural conditioning Harda district of Madhya Pradesh during rabi 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit Cost Ratio of Trifloxystrobin 25% + Tebuconazole 50% was 1:2.76.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Trifloxystrobin25% + Tebuconazole 50%e6
Outcome
Benefit Cost Ratioe6
Value
1:2.76e6
Setting
Harda district of Madhya Pradeshe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of fungicides on dry root rot of chickpea under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“efficacy of fungicides of chickpea dry root rot incited by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–127 · show in text ↑
e6

“the Benefit Cost Ratio 1:2.76 and 1:1.18 was noticed in Trifloxystrobin25% + Tebuconazole 50% and control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1339 · show in text ↑
e7

“The present investigation conducted at chickpea dry root rot hot spot area under natural conditioning Harda district of Madhya Pradesh during rabi 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit Cost Ratio of the control treatment was 1:1.18.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
control treatmente6
Outcome
Benefit Cost Ratioe6
Value
1:1.18e6
Setting
Harda district of Madhya Pradeshe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of fungicides on dry root rot of chickpea under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“efficacy of fungicides of chickpea dry root rot incited by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–127 · show in text ↑
e6

“the Benefit Cost Ratio 1:2.76 and 1:1.18 was noticed in Trifloxystrobin25% + Tebuconazole 50% and control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1339 · show in text ↑
e7

“The present investigation conducted at chickpea dry root rot hot spot area under natural conditioning Harda district of Madhya Pradesh during rabi 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–432 · show in text ↑

pyraclostrobin · Macrophomina phaseolina · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trifloxystrobin · Macrophomina phaseolina · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mancozeb · Macrophomina phaseolina · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tebuconazole · Macrophomina phaseolina · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · Macrophomina phaseolina · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.