Abstract
Toshky is a new area in the southern part of Egypt. Recently, the national project Is interested in cultivating these lands to get clean agriculture free from pollution. The concept of agricultural practices in this area should be completely different as compared to the old lands in the Nilo Delta and the Valley. Intercropping would help to get annual Income within the growing season. The intercropping system is one of the important factors to increase the income and may protect another crop from damage. The aim is to study sources as well as doses of phosphate in combination of intercropping by using maize as a protective crop for tomato traits and production under conditions of environmental stress. Two field trials were carried out at the Agricultural Research Station. Southern Valley, Toshky. The experiment was carried out for two years during 2000/2001 and 2001/2002 seasons in a randomized complete block design. The treatments are different mainly in phosphate sources (natural rock phosphate and super phosphate) and doses. Transplanting dates for tomato (castle rock) hybrid were on 25" and 30" of December in both seasons 2000/2001 and 2001/2002. respectively. while sowing dates of maize were on 15" and 20" of February in the two seasons, respectively. Tomato was transplanted In lines 100 cm width with 50 cm between each two drippers. Maize (TWC 310) was planted in hills spaced 25 em on the other side of the drippers. Soil varies from loamy to sandy loam; salinity, content of organic matter and soil fertility are very low and soil reaction tends to alkalinity. Calcium carbonate is about 13% and the soil behaved as calcareous. Based on the soi taxonomy the soil could be classified as Ty* Xerofluvants loam, mixed hyper thermic to Typic Torripsamments, sandy loam, mixed hyper thermic. It may be worth to mention that intercropping tomato with maize saved irrigation water by 40% compared with solo treatments. Tomato fruits are significantly affected by intercropping tomato with maize and phosphate sources and doses. The damage of tomato Wits was decreased and marketable yield increased. These could be attributed to the height of maize plants that acts as shadow on tomato plants and protect fruits from sun rays and reduce the effect of direct burning on fruits. Phosphate fertilizers may affect maize without
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping tomato with maize saved 40% of irrigation water compared with solo treatments.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- intercropping tomato with maizee0
- Outcome
- irrigation watere0
- Direction
- savede0
- Value
- 40%e0
- Comparator
- solo treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“intercropping tomato with maize saved irrigation water by 40% compared with solo treatments”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato fruit traits were significantly affected by intercropping with maize and phosphate sources and doses.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- intercropping tomato with maize and phosphate sources and dosese0
- Outcome
- Tomato fruitse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Tomato fruits are significantly affected by intercropping tomato with maize and phosphate sources and doses.”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize intercropping and phosphate treatments decreased tomato fruit damage.
- Taxon
- tomatoe0
- Treatment
- intercropping tomato with maize and phosphate sources and dosese1
- Outcome
- damage of tomato Witse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The damage of tomato Wits was decreased and marketable yield increased.”
e1“intercropping tomato with maize and phosphate sources and doses”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize intercropping and phosphate treatments increased marketable tomato yield.
- Taxon
- tomatoe1
- Treatment
- intercropping tomato with maize and phosphate sources and dosese1
- Outcome
- marketable yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“marketable yield increased”
e1“intercropping tomato with maize and phosphate sources and doses”
The same questions in other papers
Zea mays · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
intercropping · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →intercropping · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
phosphorus · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →phosphorus · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →intercropping · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.