Paper · 2003 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

NATURAL PHOSPHATE AFFECTING MAIZE AS A PROTECTIVE CROP FOR TOMATO UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS CONDITIONS AT TOSHKY

ALI I. N. ABDEL-AAL; ABDEL-HAFEZ A. ZOHRY

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Toshky is a new area in the southern part of Egypt. Recently, the national project Is interested in cultivating these lands to get clean agri­culture free from pollution. The concept of agricultural practices in this area should be completely different as compared to the old lands in the Nilo Delta and the Valley. Intercropping would help to get annual Income within the growing season. The intercropping system is one of the impor­tant factors to increase the income and may protect another crop from damage. The aim is to study sources as well as doses of phosphate in combination of intercropping by using maize as a protective crop for to­mato traits and production under conditions of environmental stress. Two field trials were carried out at the Agricultural Research Station. Southern Valley, Toshky. The experiment was carried out for two years during 2000/2001 and 2001/2002 seasons in a randomized complete block design. The treatments are different mainly in phosphate sources (natural rock phosphate and super phosphate) and doses. Transplanting dates for tomato (castle rock) hybrid were on 25" and 30" of December in both seasons 2000/2001 and 2001/2002. respectively. while sowing dates of maize were on 15" and 20" of February in the two seasons, re­spectively. Tomato was transplanted In lines 100 cm width with 50 cm between each two drippers. Maize (TWC 310) was planted in hills spaced 25 em on the other side of the drippers. Soil varies from loamy to sandy loam; salinity, content of organic matter and soil fertility are very low and soil reaction tends to alkalinity. Calcium carbonate is about 13% and the soil behaved as calcareous. Based on the soi taxonomy the soil could be classified as Ty* Xeroflu­vants loam, mixed hyper thermic to Typic Torripsamments, sandy loam, mixed hyper thermic. It may be worth to mention that intercropping to­mato with maize saved irrigation water by 40% compared with solo treatments. Tomato fruits are significantly affected by intercropping to­mato with maize and phosphate sources and doses. The damage of to­mato Wits was decreased and marketable yield increased. These could be attributed to the height of maize plants that acts as shadow on to­mato plants and protect fruits from sun rays and reduce the effect of di­rect burning on fruits. Phosphate fertilizers may affect maize without

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping tomato with maize saved 40% of irrigation water compared with solo treatments.

Treatment
intercropping to­mato with maizee0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
savede0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
solo treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping to­mato with maize saved irrigation water by 40% compared with solo treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–1946 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit traits were significantly affected by intercropping with maize and phosphate sources and doses.

Treatment
intercropping to­mato with maize and phosphate sources and dosese0
Outcome
Tomato fruitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato fruits are significantly affected by intercropping to­mato with maize and phosphate sources and doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1948–2057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize intercropping and phosphate treatments decreased tomato fruit damage.

Taxon
to­matoe0
Treatment
intercropping to­mato with maize and phosphate sources and dosese1
Outcome
damage of to­mato Witse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The damage of to­mato Wits was decreased and marketable yield increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2058–2130 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping to­mato with maize and phosphate sources and doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1992–2056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize intercropping and phosphate treatments increased marketable tomato yield.

Taxon
to­matoe1
Treatment
intercropping to­mato with maize and phosphate sources and dosese1
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“marketable yield increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2129 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping to­mato with maize and phosphate sources and doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1992–2056 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

intercropping · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

intercropping · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.