Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Influence of Biochar and Biofertilizer Mixture on Coffea spp. Planted in an Agroforestry Ecosystem

K S Victoria; K K M P Gonzales; E C Gestiada; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Coffee ( Coffea spp.) is considered as one of the high-value commercial crops of the world. The study assessed the growth of mature and fruiting coffee in an already-established agroforestry ecosystems amended with biofertilizer, biochar, and vermicompost mixture. Field experiments were conducted on three coffee farms within the provinces of Laguna and Batangas, Luzon Island, Philippines (coded as Sta. Maria (Laguna), Lipa1 and Lipa2 (Batangas) with treatments: control, MYKORICH® biofertilizer (MRICH), 15% bamboo biochar (BB) and MRICH+BB. All trees were applied with one kg vermicompost per tree during the start of the experiment applied at 3-4 in below the soil surface, half m away from the base of the tree. MRICH+BB consistently gave a high significant increase of 221% stem diameter increment in Sta. Maria and 214% in Lipa2 after six months to three years. In Lipa1, BB treatment gave the highest increment (20.75 mm). Soil in Sta. Maria gave the highest spore count (136 per 50 g soil) when treated with MRICH. MRICH also promoted the highest nitrogen-fixing bacterial count (15.43 CFU x 10 6 ) in Lipa2. Highest fruit yield was gathered from MRICH+BB in Sta. Maria (2,010 g per tree) and Lipa1 (1,640 g per tree) while MRICH in Lipa2 (1,390 g tree). Positive effect was also observed on soil physico-chemical characteristics (OM, N, P, K, CEC) when inoculated with either MRICH or MRICH+BB treatments. These findings can be of significance to develop a low-input sustainable system on agroforestry soils using combined biofertilizers, biochar and vermicompost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MRICH plus bamboo biochar increased stem diameter increment by 221% at Sta. Maria.

Taxon
Coffea spp.Coffeat0
Treatment
MRICH+BBe0
Outcome
stem diameter incremente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
221%e0
Setting
Sta. Mariae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MRICH+BB consistently gave a high significant increase of 221% stem diameter increment in Sta. Maria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MRICH plus bamboo biochar increased stem diameter increment by 214% at Lipa2.

Taxon
Coffea spp.Coffeat0
Treatment
MRICH+BBe0
Outcome
stem diameter incremente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
214%e0
Setting
Lipa2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MRICH+BB consistently gave a high significant increase of 221% stem diameter increment in Sta. Maria and 214% in Lipa2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bamboo biochar gave the highest stem increment at Lipa1, 20.75 mm.

Taxon
Coffea spp.Coffeat0
Treatment
BB treatmente0
Outcome
incremente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
20.75 mme0
Setting
Lipa1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Lipa1, BB treatment gave the highest increment (20.75 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MRICH yielded the highest soil spore count at Sta. Maria, 136 per 50 g soil.

Taxon
Coffea spp.Coffeat0
Treatment
MRICHe0
Outcome
Soil in Sta. Maria gave the highest spore counte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
136 per 50 g soile0
Setting
Sta. Mariae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil in Sta. Maria gave the highest spore count (136 per 50 g soil) when treated with MRICH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MRICH promoted the highest nitrogen fixing bacterial count at Lipa2.

Taxon
Coffea spp.Coffeat0
Treatment
MRICHe0
Interactor
nitrogen-fixing bacteriale0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen-fixing bacterial counte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.43 CFU x 10 6e0
Setting
Lipa2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MRICH also promoted the highest nitrogen-fixing bacterial count (15.43 CFU x 10 6 ) in Lipa2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MRICH plus biochar gave the highest fruit yield at Sta. Maria, 2,010 g per tree.

Taxon
Coffea spp.Coffeat0
Treatment
MRICH+BBe0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
2,010 g per treee0
Setting
Sta. Mariae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest fruit yield was gathered from MRICH+BB in Sta. Maria (2,010 g per tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MRICH plus biochar gave the highest fruit yield at Lipa1, 1,640 g per tree.

Taxon
Coffea spp.Coffeat0
Treatment
MRICH+BBe0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
1,640 g per treee0
Setting
Lipa1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest fruit yield was gathered from MRICH+BB in Sta. Maria (2,010 g per tree) and Lipa1 (1,640 g per tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MRICH gave the highest fruit yield at Lipa2, 1,390 g per tree.

Taxon
Coffea spp.Coffeat0
Treatment
MRICHe0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
1,390 g treee0
Setting
Lipa2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest fruit yield was gathered from MRICH+BB in Sta. Maria (2,010 g per tree) and Lipa1 (1,640 g per tree) while MRICH in Lipa2 (1,390 g tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MRICH had a positive effect on soil physicochemical properties.

Taxon
Coffea spp.Coffeat0
Treatment
MRICHe0
Outcome
soil physico-chemical characteristics (OM, N, P, K, CEC)e0
Direction
Positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive effect was also observed on soil physico-chemical characteristics (OM, N, P, K, CEC) when inoculated with either MRICH or MRICH+BB treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MRICH plus biochar had a positive effect on soil physicochemical properties.

Taxon
Coffea spp.Coffeat0
Treatment
MRICH+BBe0
Outcome
soil physico-chemical characteristics (OM, N, P, K, CEC)e0
Direction
Positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive effect was also observed on soil physico-chemical characteristics (OM, N, P, K, CEC) when inoculated with either MRICH or MRICH+BB treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · growth · Coffea (coffee)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

biochar · yield · Coffea (coffee)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Coffea (coffee)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biochar · growth · Coffea (coffee)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.