Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Enhancing Productivity and Water Use Efficiency of Zaid Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) through Sprinkler Irrigation, Fertility Amendments and Bio-regulator

Harphool Meena; Rajendra K. Yadav; Manoj; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted on mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) during three consecutive years of zaid (2016 to 2018) at Agricultural Research Station, Ummedganj, Kota (Rajasthan). The experiment consisted of 12 treatment combinations including three irrigation regimes (IW/CPE ratio 0.8, 1.0 and 1.2) and four fertility amendments along with foliar spray of bio-regulator (100 % RDF, 100 % RDF + salicylic acid 100 ppm, 125 % RDF + salicylic acid 100 ppm and 150% RDF + salicylic acid 100 ppm) were under taken in split plot design with four replications. The maximum grain yield (930 kg ha-1) was recorded under application of IW/CPE ratio 1.2 over IW/CPE ratio 1.0 and 0.8. Significantly higher WUE (2.04 and 2.03 kg ha-mm-1) and WP (0.204 and 0.203 kg m-3) were recorded under irrigation regime of IW/CPE ratio 1.2 and 1.0 in comparison to IW/CPE ratio 0.8. Significantly higher net return (Rs. 37409/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.89) were recorded under irrigation regime of IW/CPE ratio 1.2 over irrigation regimes of IW/CPE ratio 1.0 and 0.8. The maximum grain yield (830 and 840 kg ha-1) was recorded with the application of 125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm remained on par with 150 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm, but it was found significantly superior over application of over application of 100 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDF. Significantly higher water use efficiency (2.06 kg ha-mm-1) and water productivity (0.206 kg m-3) were recorded in mungbean with the application of 125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm over application of 100% RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDF in mungbean. Application of 125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm gave maximum net return (Rs. 31272/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.59) over application of 100% RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDF.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IW/CPE ratio 1.2 produced maximum grain yield of 930 kg ha-1 compared with 1.0 and 0.8.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
IW/CPE ratio 1.2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
930 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
IW/CPE ratio 1.0 and 0.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum grain yield (930 kg ha-1) was recorded under application of IW/CPE ratio 1.2 over IW/CPE ratio 1.0 and 0.8.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–671 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IW/CPE ratios 1.2 and 1.0 had significantly higher WUE than 0.8.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
IW/CPE ratio 1.2 and 1.0e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.04 and 2.03 kg ha-mm-1e0
Comparator
IW/CPE ratio 0.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher WUE (2.04 and 2.03 kg ha-mm-1) and WP (0.204 and 0.203 kg m-3) were recorded under irrigation regime of IW/CPE ratio 1.2 and 1.0 in comparison to IW/CPE ratio 0.8.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–856 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IW/CPE ratios 1.2 and 1.0 had significantly higher WP than 0.8.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
IW/CPE ratio 1.2 and 1.0e0
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.204 and 0.203 kg m-3e0
Comparator
IW/CPE ratio 0.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher WUE (2.04 and 2.03 kg ha-mm-1) and WP (0.204 and 0.203 kg m-3) were recorded under irrigation regime of IW/CPE ratio 1.2 and 1.0 in comparison to IW/CPE ratio 0.8.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–856 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IW/CPE ratio 1.2 gave significantly higher net return than 1.0 and 0.8.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
IW/CPE ratio 1.2e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 37409/- ha-1e0
Comparator
IW/CPE ratio 1.0 and 0.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher net return (Rs. 37409/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.89) were recorded under irrigation regime of IW/CPE ratio 1.2 over irrigation regimes of IW/CPE ratio 1.0 and 0.8.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IW/CPE ratio 1.2 gave a significantly higher B:C ratio than 1.0 and 0.8.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
IW/CPE ratio 1.2e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.89e0
Comparator
IW/CPE ratio 1.0 and 0.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher net return (Rs. 37409/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.89) were recorded under irrigation regime of IW/CPE ratio 1.2 over irrigation regimes of IW/CPE ratio 1.0 and 0.8.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125 % RDF plus salicylic acid gave maximum grain yield, on par with 150 % RDF plus salicylic acid and superior to lower fertility treatments.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
830 and 840 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
on par with 150 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppme0
Comparator
100 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum grain yield (830 and 840 kg ha-1) was recorded with the application of 125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm remained on par with 150 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm, but it was found significantly superior over application of over application of 100 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1392 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125 % RDF plus salicylic acid gave significantly higher water use efficiency than lower fertility treatments.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppme0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.06 kg ha-mm-1e0
Comparator
100% RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher water use efficiency (2.06 kg ha-mm-1) and water productivity (0.206 kg m-3) were recorded in mungbean with the application of 125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm over application of 100% RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDF in mungbean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125 % RDF plus salicylic acid gave significantly higher water productivity than lower fertility treatments.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppme0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.206 kg m-3e0
Comparator
100% RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher water use efficiency (2.06 kg ha-mm-1) and water productivity (0.206 kg m-3) were recorded in mungbean with the application of 125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm over application of 100% RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDF in mungbean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125 % RDF plus salicylic acid gave maximum net return over lower fertility treatments.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppme0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 31272/- ha-1e0
Comparator
100% RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm gave maximum net return (Rs. 31272/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.59) over application of 100% RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1903 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125 % RDF plus salicylic acid gave a B:C ratio of 1.59 over lower fertility treatments.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppme0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.59e0
Comparator
100% RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 125 % RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm gave maximum net return (Rs. 31272/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (1.59) over application of 100% RDF + foliar spray of salicylic acid 100 ppm and 100 % RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1903 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–58 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

application · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.